PROXY STATEMENT

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Be Held May ~~1, 2014~~4, 2017

INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (AAM or the Company) is providing proxy materials electronically via the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each stockholder. On March ~~21, 2014,~~7, 2017, we mailed to our stockholders (other than those who previously requested e-mail or paper delivery) a Notice of Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including our proxy statement, annual report to stockholders, and ~~2013~~our 2016 annual report on Form 10-K. The Notice of Availability of Proxy Materials provides instructions on how you may submit your proxy over the Internet or by telephone.

This electronic delivery process is designed to expedite stockholder receipt of proxy materials, lower the cost of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (annual meeting), and conserve natural resources. However, if you would prefer to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Availability of Proxy Materials. If you have previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials by e-mail unless you elect otherwise. If you received a printed copy of proxy materials by mail and would like to view future proxy materials over the Internet, you can do so by accessing the Internet at www.envisionreports.com/~~AXL~~axl.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING AND THE ANNUAL MEETING

Why am I receiving this proxy statement?

You received these proxy materials because you owned shares of AAM common stock on March ~~4, 2014~~7, 2017 (record date). AAM’s Board of Directors (Board) is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the annual meeting. By use of a proxy, you can vote whether or not you attend the meeting. This proxy statement includes information that we are required to provide to you and is designed to assist you in voting your shares.

Who is entitled to vote?

Holders of AAM common stock on the record date are entitled to one vote per share. You are a holder of record if your shares are held directly in your name with AAM’s transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank, trustee or other record holder, you are a street name holder. If you hold shares in more than one account, each notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card you receive that has a unique control number must be voted so that all your shares are voted.

How do I vote?

You may vote by any of the following methods:

In person — attending the annual meeting and casting a ballot.

By mail — using the proxy and/or voting instruction card provided.

By telephone or over the Internet — following the instructions on your notice card, proxy and/or voting instruction card.

If you vote by telephone or over the Internet, have your notice card or proxy and/or voting instruction card available. The control number on your card is necessary to process your vote. A telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned the card by mail. If you hold shares in street name, refer to the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank, trustee or other record holder.

How many shares may vote at the meeting?

As of March ~~4, 2014,~~7, 2017, we had ~~75,646,724~~76,912,332 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Under AAM’s by-laws, a majority of these shares must be present in person or by proxy to hold the annual meeting and take any action during the meeting.

Can I change my vote?

You may change your vote at any time before the annual meeting by:

revoking it by written notice to AAM’s Secretary at the address on the cover of this proxy statement;

voting in person at the annual meeting; or

delivering a later-dated proxy vote by mail, telephone or over the Internet.

~~Table of Contents~~

What are the Board’s recommendations on how I should vote my shares?

~~The Board recommends that you vote your shares as follows:~~

Proposal 1 — FOR the election of the three nominees with terms expiring at the ~~2017~~2020 annual meeting;

Proposal 2 — FOR approval of the Amended and Restated AAM 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan;

Proposal 3 — FOR approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of AAM’s named executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, tables and related narrative;

Proposal 4 — FOR approval, on an advisory basis, of a one-year frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation; and

Proposal 35 — FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, ~~2014.~~2017.

What are my choices when voting?

Proposal 1 — You may vote for or ~~withhold~~against each nominee, or you may abstain from voting your ~~vote on one or more of the nominees.~~shares.

Proposal 2 — You may vote for or against the proposal to approve the Amended and Restated AAM 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, or you may abstain from voting your shares.

Proposal 3 — You may vote for or against the proposal to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, or you may abstain from voting your shares.

Proposal 34 — You may vote for a one-year, two-year, or three-year frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, or you may abstain from voting your shares.

Proposal 5 — You may vote for or against the proposal to ratify the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, or you may abstain from voting your shares.

~~What~~How many vote are needed for the proposals to pass?

The election of each nominee is ~~required~~uncontested. In an uncontested election, nominees for director who receive a majority of "for" votes cast (meaning the number of shares voted "for" a nominee exceed the number of shares voted "against" that nominee) will be elected. If an incumbent director nominee does not receive a majority of votes cast in an uncontested election, our by-laws require the director to ~~approve each proposal?~~

~~Proposal 1 — A plurality~~promptly tender a written resignation to the Board. After receiving a recommendation from the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, the Board will determine whether to accept or reject the resignation, and will publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days of the ~~votes cast~~date the election results are certified.

The advisory vote on the frequency of future proposals on executive compensation is a plurality vote. The Board and the Compensation Committee will consider stockholders to ~~elect~~have expressed a ~~director, which means~~non-binding preference for the frequency option that ~~nominees with~~receives the most ~~affirmative votes~~votes. Each of the other proposals will ~~be elected to fill~~pass if the ~~available seats.~~

~~Proposal 2 — An~~ affirmative vote of a majority of the shares ~~voted~~present in person or by proxy ~~must be~~are cast in favor of the ~~advisory vote to approve the compensation of AAM’s named executive officers.~~

Proposal 3 — An affirmative vote of a majority of the shares voted in person or by proxy must be cast in favor of the ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Proposals 2 and 3 are advisory votes only and, as discussed in more detail in each proposal, the voting results are not binding on AAM. However, with respect to proposal 2, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote in making future determinations concerning the compensation of our named executive officers. With respect to proposal 3, the Audit Committee will consider whether the appointment of Deloitte & Touche, LLP is in the best interests of the Company if the appointment is not ratified.proposal.

Who will count the votes?

Representatives of Computershare Trust Company, N.A., AAM’s transfer agent, will count the votes and serve as our inspector of election. The inspector of election will attend the annual meeting.

What if ~~I “withhold” my vote or~~ “abstain”?

~~Votes withheld~~In you abstain from voting, your shares will:

be counted as present for purposes of determining whether there are enough votes to establish a quorum;

have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors; or

count as a vote against any other proposal to be considered at the annual meeting.

What if I do not return my proxy card and ~~abstentions~~do not attend the annual meeting?

If your shares are registered in your own name with our transfer agent and you do not vote, your shares will not be voted at all. If you hold your shares in "street name" and do not give your bank, broker, or other holder of record specific voting instructions, your record holder may vote your shares on the ratification of the independent registered public firm, but may not vote your shares on any other matter that comes before the annual meeting. If you do not provide voting instructions on these matters, the votes will be considered "broker non-votes." Broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining whether ~~a majority of shares~~there is ~~present to establish~~ a quorum, ~~and hold the annual meeting. Abstentions~~but will not ~~be counted in the tally of votes for or against any proposal. A withheld vote has the same effect as an abstention.~~

~~What if I do not vote and do not attend the annual meeting?~~

If you are a holder of record and you do not vote your shares at the annual meeting or by proxy, your shares will not be voted. If you sign and return your proxy card without specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by the Board.

Under New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rules, brokers have discretionary power to vote your shares only on “routine” matters. Brokers do not have discretionary power to vote your shares on “non-routine” matters. If you hold shares in street name, and you do not give your bank, broker, trustee or other holder of record specific voting instructions for your shares, your record holder can only vote your shares on the ratification of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (proposal 3), a “routine” matter.

Without your specific instructions, your record holder cannot vote your shares on the election of directors and the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation. For each of these matters, if you do not instruct your record holder how to vote, the record holder may not vote your shares. Shares not voted will be broker non-votes and will not be counted in determiningaffect the outcome of ~~the vote for proposals 1 and 2. Broker non-votes will have no impact on the outcome of these proposals.~~any proposal. We urge you to give your record holder voting instructions on each proposal being presented at the annual meeting.

~~Table of Contents~~

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board proposes that ~~the three directors standing for re-election as Class III directors,~~ James A. McCaslin, William P. Miller II and Samuel Valenti III be ~~elected~~re-elected to the Board as Class III directors for terms expiring at the annual meeting in ~~2017.~~2020.

The Board is divided into three classes. Directors serve for staggered three-year terms. The Board believes that the staggered election of directors helps to maintain continuity and ensures that a majority of directors at any given time will have in-depth knowledge of the Company.

The Board unanimously approved the nominations of ~~our Class III directors~~Mr. McCaslin, Mr. Miller and Mr. Valenti based on their ~~achievements, special competencies~~demonstrated effectiveness as members of our Board and the committees on which they serve, their relevant experience and expertise, and their sound judgment and integrity. Each nominee brings a strong and unique background and set of skills to the Board.

Collectively, the Board has high levels of competence and experience in a variety of areas, including manufacturing, engineering, finance, international business, management, law, risk management, strategic business development and the global automotive industry. A summary of the principal occupation, professional background and specific ~~qualifications and/or skills~~knowledge and expertise that qualify each nominee and returning director to serve on our Board is provided in the following pages of this proxy statement.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees.

~~Table of Contents~~

Nominees for Director

Class III — Directors to hold office until the ~~2017~~2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders



		JAMES A. McCASLIN Age 6568 Mr. McCaslin retired from Harley Davidson, Inc. in April 2010. Mr. McCaslin joined Harley Davidson in 1992 and held various senior executive leadership positions, including President and Chief Operating Officer of Harley-Davidson Motor Company from 2001 to 2009. From 1989 to 1992, he held manufacturing and engineering positions with JI Case, a manufacturer of agricultural equipment. Previously, he held executive positions in manufacturing and quality with Chrysler Corporation, Volkswagen of America and General Motors Corporation, where he began his 40-year career in manufacturing. From 2003 to 2006, he served on the Board of Directors of Maytag Corporation. Mr. McCaslin has served on a number of civic boards, including Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Milwaukee, Manufacturing Skill Standards Council and Kettering University. Mr. McCaslin’s extensive operational expertise and experience in multiple manufacturing industries provide the Board with a valued resource in support of AAM's operational objectives, which include engineering, quality and technology leadership, operational excellence and global geographic and product diversification.		Director since 2011

		WILLIAM P. MILLER II CFA Age 5861 Mr. Miller, Chartered Financial Analyst, is Head of Asset Allocation for the Saudi Arabian Investment Company. ~~Since~~Separately, since 2003, Mr. Miller has been a member of the Board of Directors of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, serving on the Audit Committee, Finance Committee and Market Regulation Oversight Committee. ~~Since June 2011, Mr. Miller has served on the Board of Directors of the Dubai Mercantile Exchange, where he also serves on the Compensation Committee and the Compliance Committee.~~ From April 2011 to October 2013, he was the Senior Managing Director & Chief Financial Officer of Financial Markets International, Inc.~~, an international law and economics consulting firm.~~ From 2005 to 2011, he was employed by the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, where he served as Deputy Chief Investment Officer. Previously, he was Senior Risk Manager for the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and an Independent Risk Oversight Officer and Chief Compliance Officer for Commonfund ~~Group, an investment management firm for educational institutions.~~Group. Mr. Miller also served as Director, Trading Operations and Asset Mix Management with General Motors Investment Management Corp. and as a financial analyst with the U.S. Department of Transportation. Mr. Miller also served on the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Standing Advisory Group, the Institutional Investor Advisory Board for Golub Capital, ~~a U.S. asset manager with over $7 billion~~the Board of ~~assets under management,~~Directors of the Dubai Mercantile Exchange and the Board of Directors of the Dubai International Financial Exchange. Mr. Miller’s expertise in finance, investments, risk management, compliance, international business, audit and accounting provides the Board with valuable guidance in assessing and managing risks and in fulfilling the Board’s financial oversight role.		Director since 2005

~~Table of Contents~~



		SAMUEL VALENTI III Age 6871 Mr. Valenti ~~currently~~ serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Valenti Capital LLC and World Capital Partners, investment firms located in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. Since 2002, Mr. Valenti has served as Chairman of the Board of TriMas Corporation, a manufacturer of highly engineered precision products for industry. In June 2015, Mr. Valenti became Co-Chair of the Board of Directors of Horizon Global Corporation, a designer, manufacturer and distributor of custom-engineered towing, trailer and cargo management products. Until 2008, Mr. Valenti had a 40-year career with Masco Corporation, a Fortune 500 manufacturer of home building and home improvement products, serving as Vice President - Investments from 1974 to 1998. From 1988 to 2008, Mr. Valenti was President and a member of the Board of Directors of Masco Capital Corporation. Mr. Valenti is a member of the Business Leaders for Michigan and serves as Chairman of the Renaissance Venture Capital Fund. ~~AAM's Board selected~~ Mr. Valenti ~~as a director in consideration of his~~has demonstrated leadership skills, breadth of management experience in diversified manufacturing businesses, and ~~his~~highly recognized subject matter expertise in ~~the areas of~~mergers and acquisitions, finance, economics and asset management.		Director since 2013

~~Table of Contents~~

RETURNING DIRECTORS

Class I — Directors to hold office until the ~~2015~~2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders



		DAVID C. DAUCH Age 4952 David C. Dauch is ~~President &~~ Chief Executive Officer of AAM, a position he has held since September 2012. Mr. Dauch was appointed Chairman of the Board onin August ~~16,~~ 2013. ~~Since June 2008, he~~From September 2012 through August 2015, Mr. Dauch served as AAM's President & ~~Chief Operating Officer and previously~~CEO. Prior to that, Mr. Dauch served as ~~Executive Vice~~ President & Chief Operating ~~Officer.~~Officer (2008 - 2012) and held several other positions of increasing responsibility from the time he joined AAM in 1995. Prior to joining AAM, ~~in 1995,~~ Mr. Dauch held several positions at Collins & Aikman Products Company, where he received the President’s Award for leadership and innovation. Mr. Dauch also served on the Collins & Aikman Board of Directors from 2002 to 2007. Presently, he serves on the boards of Business Leaders for Michigan, the Detroit Economic Club, the Detroit Regional Chamber, the Great Lakes Council Boy Scouts of America, the Boys & Girls Club of Southeast Michigan, ~~and~~the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), the Original Equipment Suppliers ~~Association.~~Association (OESA), Amerisure Mutual Holdings, Inc. and the Amerisure Companies (since December 2014) and Horizon Global Corporation (since June 2015). Mr. Dauch also serves on the Miami University Business Advisory ~~Council. Mr. Dauch’s day-to-day leadership as President & Chief Executive Officer provides him with intimate knowledge of~~Council and ~~responsibility for developing and implementing~~ the ~~Company’s operating objectives.~~General Motors Supplier Council. Mr. Dauch’s leadership of AAM’s global business and operations provides the Board with strategic vision and insight ~~regarding~~that are vital to AAM’s strategic plans for the future.		Director since 2009

		~~FOREST J. FARMER~~ ~~Age 73~~ Mr. Farmer has served as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer & President of The Farmer Group, a holding company for three technology and manufacturing companies, since 1998. Mr. Farmer serves on the Board of Directors of Saturn Electronics & Engineering, Inc., a global supplier of electronic components, engineering and other services to the automotive, appliance and communications industries. From 1997 to 2011, Mr. Farmer was a member of the Board of Directors of The Lubrizol Corporation, serving on the Compensation Committee. In 1994, he retired from Chrysler Corporation after 26 years of service, which included six years as President of its Acustar automotive parts subsidiary. Through his senior management-level experience, Mr. Farmer brings strong leadership skills, extensive U.S. automotive experience and valuable manufacturing expertise to our Board.		~~Director since~~ ~~1999~~

~~Table of Contents~~



		~~RICHARD C. LAPPIN~~WILLIAM L. KOZYRA Age 6959 Mr. ~~Lappin~~Kozyra is ~~Executive Chairman of VOKAL Interactive, a maker of mobile applications for business. From 2007 to 2010, he was~~ Chairman of the Board &and Chief Executive Officer of ~~Clear Sky Power, an alternative energy company.~~TI Automotive Ltd., a global supplier of automotive fluid storage, carrying and delivery technology. He has served as TI Automotive's CEO since June 2008. Prior to that, Mr. ~~Lappin retired in 2004~~Kozyra was President and CEO of Continental AG North America for 10 years. He was also a member of the Executive Board, Continental AG (DAX), Hanover, Germany, with responsibility for Continental AG's NAFTA businesses. Previously, at ITT Automotive, he served as ~~Chairman~~Vice President and General Manager, Brake and Chassis Systems North America. Prior to joining ITT Automotive, he was Vice President and General Manager of Bosch Braking Systems' Brake Products Division. Mr. Kozyra is a member of the Board of ~~Haynes International, Inc. Previously,~~Directors of the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association (MEMA), the General Motors Supplier Council, the Ford Motor Company Top 100 Supplier Forum, the Board of Trustees of the Notre Dame Preparatory School, the Boy Scouts of America Executive Board in Detroit, Michigan, the Board of Advisors of the University of Detroit and the University of Detroit Alumni Council and the Society of Automotive Engineers. Mr. ~~Lappin served as Senior~~Kozyra has 36 years of experience in the global automotive industry and demonstrated leadership skills and technical background in the areas of manufacturing, engineering, quality systems and sales, all of which are aligned with AAM's business objectives.		Director since 2015
		PETER D. LYONS Age 61 Mr. Lyons, an attorney, is a partner and Regional Managing ~~Director~~Partner - Americas of ~~The Blackstone Group L.P., where~~Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP, which he joined in September 2014. Based in the New York office of Freshfields, Mr. Lyons represents leading U.S. and global companies in acquisitions and sales of public and private companies, asset acquisition and disposition transactions, and joint ventures. Prior to joining Freshfields, Mr. Lyons was a partner with Shearman & Sterling LLP and a member of the ~~Private Equity~~Mergers & Acquisitions Group based in New York, New York. Mr. Lyons practiced law at Shearman & Sterling for 35 years. Mr. Lyons has been recognized and recommended as a Mergers & Acquisitions practitioner by Chambers Global, Chambers USA, The Legal 500 US, and IFLR1000. Mr. Lyons received his law degree from ~~1998~~Georgetown University Law Center and his Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Virginia. From 2003 to ~~2002. He also helped monitor~~2014, while a partner at Shearman & Sterling, Mr. Lyons served as lead counsel to AAM and as a key advisor to the ~~operations of Blackstone Capital Partners portfolio~~Board on legal matters. Mr. Lyons has extensive experience advising global companies and evaluated business strategy options. From 1989 to 1998, Mr. Lappin was President of Farley Industries, which included West Point-Pepperell, Inc., Acme Boot Company, Inc., Tool and Engineering, Inc., Magnus Metals, Inc. and Fruit of the Loom, Inc. He also served as President & Chief Executive Officer of Doehler-Jarvis and Southern Fastening Systems, and he has held senior executive positions with Champion Spark Plug Company and RTE Corporation. Mr. Lappin’s experience as a CEO and his financial expertise provide the Board with an important perspective in the areas of business strategy and organizational development,corporate boards as well as ~~sound investment criteria, capital structure~~highly recognized subject matter expertise in mergers and ~~liquidity management.~~acquisitions and other corporate transactions, corporate governance and other areas of significance to the Board.		Director since ~~1999~~ 2015

		~~THOMAS K. WALKER~~ ~~Age 73~~ Mr. Walker is Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer of Lackawanna Acquisition Corporation and is the former President of Amcast Automotive, where from 1995 to 1999 he directed all activities for the $300 million automotive group. Previously, he held senior executive positions with ITT Automotive and Allied-Signal Automotive Catalyst Co. He also served in various manufacturing and engineering leadership positions with Volkswagen of America and with General Motors Corporation, where he began his 51-year career in the automotive industry. Mr. Walker serves on the National Advisory Board for Michigan Technological University. Mr. Walker’s business acumen and extensive leadership experience in the automotive industry provide our Board with expertise related to engineering, manufacturing operations and strategic business development.		~~Director since~~ ~~1999~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Class ~~II —~~II— Directors to hold office until the ~~2016~~2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders




		ELIZABETH A. ~~(BETH)~~ CHAPPELL Age 5659 Ms. Chappell has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Detroit Economic Club since 2002. Previously, she served as Executive Vice President, Corporate Communications & Investor Relations for Compuware Corporation. From 1995 to 2000, Ms.Chappell was President and Chief Executive Officer of a consulting firm she founded, The Chappell Group, Inc. For 16 years, Ms. Chappell held executive positions at AT&T. From 1999 to 2009, Ms. Chappell served on the Board of Directors of the Handleman Company. She also serves on a number of civic boards, including the Michigan State University Capital Campaign, Citizens Research Council, Detroit Regional Chamber, the United Way Board and Tocqueville Committee, and the Charter One Regional Advisory Board (Midwest). Ms. Chappell is a former board member of the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Michigan Economic Growth Authority and Hospice of Michigan. Ms. Chappell’s demonstrated leadership skills, entrepreneurial business experience and service on various boards enhance her contributions to the Board in the areas of investor relations, community outreach and corporate citizenship, marketing and communications, executive compensation and strategic business development.		Director since 2004
		~~STEVEN B. HANTLER~~ ~~Age 61~~ Mr. Hantler is Director of Policy Initiatives for The Marcus Family Office. In this capacity, he advises Home Depot co-founder, Bernie Marcus, in the areas of government affairs, legal and regulatory policy, national security, free enterprise and higher education. Previously, he had a 27-year career with Chrysler Corporation, where he held positions as Assistant General Counsel, Manufacturing Group Counsel, and Senior Trial Attorney. Prior to joining Chrysler, Mr. Hantler was engaged in private law practice. Mr. Hantler is a Senior Fellow at the Pacific Research Institute and a member of the Legal Policy Advisory Board of the Washington Legal Foundation. Previously, Mr. Hantler served as Chair of the State Government Leadership Foundation, which educates state leaders on public policy issues, Chair of the Advisory Board of the National Judicial College, and on the Board of Directors of the New York University Law School Center for Labor and Employment. Mr. Hantler’s leadership experience and expertise in law, public relations and government affairs provide the Board with knowledge and insight in these areas of importance to the Board’s oversight of AAM’s global business growth and strategic initiatives.		~~Director since~~ ~~2011~~

~~Table of Contents~~



		JOHN F. SMITH Age 6366 Mr. Smith is principal of Eagle Advisors LLC, a consulting firm ~~in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan~~ that specializes in strategy development and performance improvement. From 2000 to 2010, Mr. Smith held positions of increasing responsibility with General Motors Corporation in sales and marketing, product planning and corporate strategy, most recently as Group Vice President, Corporate Planning and Alliances. During his 42-year career in the automotive industry, Mr. Smith also served as General Manager of Cadillac Motor Car, President of Allison Transmission, and Vice President, Planning at General Motors International Operations in Zurich, Switzerland. Mr. Smith ~~currently~~ serves on the boards of CEVA Holdings LLC ~~Plasan Carbon Composites~~(where he serves on the Executive Committee) and ~~Enginetics, LLC.~~Covisint Corporation (where he serves as Chairman). Mr. Smith also serves as an advisor to VNG.CO, a developer of compressed natural gas refueling stations, Enginetics LLC, a fuel-injection technology start-up company, and ~~Palogix International, a provider of in-bound logistics and container management solutions.~~Arnold Magnetics. Mr. Smith is a member of the National Advisory Board of Boy Scouts of ~~America and the Board of Trustees of St. John's Providence Health System in Michigan.~~America. He served on the ~~Board of Directors~~boards of Smith Electric Vehicles Corp. ~~from June~~(June 2012 to- December ~~2013.~~2013), Plasan Carbon Composites (December 2013 - December 2014) and Arnold Magnetics (January 2015 - September 2016). Mr. Smith's extensive experience in manufacturing, finance, business development, international operations, sales and marketing, product development and mergers and acquisitions is aligned with AAM's key business objectives, including continued global business growth and diversification.		Director since 2011

Merger with Metaldyne Performance Group Inc.

~~Table~~As previously disclosed, on November 3, 2016, the Company, Alpha SPV I, Inc. (Merger Sub) and Metaldyne Performance Group Inc. (MPG) entered into an Agreement and Plan of ~~Contents~~Merger (the merger agreement). Pursuant to the merger agreement, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge into MPG, with MPG as the surviving entity (the merger). As a result of the merger, MPG will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

The merger agreement requires, among other things, that, prior to the effective time of the merger, AAM will (1) increase the size of the Board to 11 members, (2) appoint to a different class of the Board three individuals designated by American Securities (AS, and such individuals, the AS designees) and (3) cause one AS designee to be appointed to each committee of the Board, in each case, effective as of the effective time of the merger. The appointment of each AS designee to the Board will be subject to such designee satisfying AAM’s qualification requirements for directors and, with respect to each committee appointment, will be subject to independence and other requirements for such committees set by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and applicable law. The AS designees are current MPG directors George Thanopoulos, Kevin S. Penn and Loren S. Easton.

The Company currently expects to close the merger in the first half of 2017, subject to the satisfaction of the closing conditions set out in the merger agreement. If the merger closes on the day of or after the annual meeting of stockholders on May 4, 2017, the AS designees will be appointed to the Board as described above. If the merger closes before the annual meeting, the AS designees will be appointed to the Board as described above, but the term of the AS designee in Class III would end as of the annual meeting. In that case, the Board expects to immediately reappoint such AS designee to serve the new term of a Class III director. The AS designees in Classes I and II will stand for re-election upon the expiration of their terms in 2018 and 2019, respectively.

For more information regarding the merger, you are urged to read the joint proxy statement/prospectus dated March 6, 2017, which AAM and MPG filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the same date and first mailed to each company's stockholders on or about March 7, 2017. You are urged to read the joint proxy statement/prospectus (including any amendments or supplements thereto) and other documents filed by AAM or MPG with the SEC in connection with the merger as these documents contain (or will contain) important information. Those documents, as well as AAM's other public filings with the SEC, may be obtained without charge at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and at our website at http://www.aam.com.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that meet or exceed the requirements of the NYSE listing standards. AAM’s Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at http://investor.aam.com.

Director Independence

AAM’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that at least a majority of the members of the Board meet the independence criteria of the NYSE listing standards. Currently, ~~nine~~seven of our ~~ten~~eight directors are independent from the Company. Only David C. Dauch, who serves as AAM's ~~President &~~ Chief Executive Officer, is not independent due to his employment with AAM.

The Board has established Director Independence Guidelines to assist in determining the independence of our directors for purposes of the NYSE independence standards. The Director Independence Guidelines are included in AAM’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at http://investor.aam.com. The Board annually reviews and determines, on the recommendation of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, whether any director has a material relationship with the Company that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. No director qualifies as independent unless the Board determines that the director has no direct or indirect material relationship with the Company.

As a result of this evaluation, the Board determined that the following nominees and returning directors have no material relationships with AAM and are independent: Elizabeth A. ~~(Beth)~~ Chappell, ~~Forest J. Farmer, Steven B. Hantler, Richard C. Lappin,~~William L. Kozyra, Peter D. Lyons, James A. McCaslin, William P. Miller II, John F. Smith and Samuel Valenti ~~III and Thomas K. Walker.~~III.

In making these independence determinations, the Board considered Ms. Chappell’s position as President & CEO of the Detroit Economic Club, in light of the sponsorship fees AAM pays to this non-profit organization. The annual fees paid by AAM to the Detroit Economic Club are significantly below the threshold amount established under the NYSE independence standards and our Director Independence Guidelines, which is the greater of two percent of the outside entity’s annual gross revenues or $1 million.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board's current leadership structure includes a combined Chairman and CEO role with a lead independent director. OnIn August ~~16,~~ 2013, the Board appointed ~~President & CEO~~ David C. Dauch as Chairman of the ~~Board, following the passing of our Co-Founder and former Executive Chairman, Richard E. Dauch, on August 2, 2013.~~Board.

Our Board believes that it is in the best interest of the Company to combine the roles of Chairman and CEO at this time because it provides the Company with unified leadership and direction. The Board believes the Company's CEO is best situated to serve as Chairman because he is the director most familiar with the Company's business and industry, and is in a position to effectively identify strategic priorities and lead the discussion and execution of strategy. While the Company's independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from various perspectives outside the Company, the CEO's in-depth knowledge of our business enables him to identify areas of focus for the Board and effectively recommend appropriate agendas. The Board believes that the combined role of Chairman and CEO facilitates information flow between management and the Board, provides clear accountability and promotes efficient decision making, all of which are essential to effective governance.

Our Board leadership structure is further enhanced by an Independent Lead Director. ~~Effective~~In April ~~30,~~ 2014, the Board selected Mr. McCaslin ~~will hold~~to serve in this ~~position, replacing Mr. Walker.~~role. The Independent Lead Director's responsibilities are to:

preside at executive sessions of the independent directors, which are held at the end of each scheduled Board meeting;

call special executive sessions of independent directors, as appropriate;

serve ~~on all standing committees required by NYSE listing standards and the Executive Committee;~~

~~serve~~ as chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee;

serve as liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman ~~President~~ & CEO;

inform the Chairman ~~President~~ & CEO of issues arising from executive sessions of the independent directors; and

with Board approval, retain outside advisors and/or consultants who report directly to the full Board on matters of interest to the ~~full~~ Board.

~~Table of Contents~~

Board Oversight of Risk Management

The Board, directly and through its committees, is responsible for overseeing the management of potential risks affecting the Company. In connection with our overall risk management process, the Board regularly reviews information provided by senior management about the Company’s strategic, operational, financial and compliance

risks. In addition, the chairs of ~~the Audit, Compensation, Nominating/Corporate Governance, Strategy and Technology Committees~~each standing committee regularly report to the Board on the activities of their respective ~~Committees,~~committees, including matters related to risk.

The Audit Committee oversees management of financial risks and receives regular reports from management on the Company’s overall risk management structure and processes. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee manages risks associated with corporate governance and management succession planning. The Compensation Committee oversees risks related to AAM’s compensation programs. The Technology Committee oversees risks related to AAM’s product, process and systems technology. ~~The Strategy Committee oversees risks related to the development and implementation of the Company’s strategic plan.~~ Additional review or reporting of specific risks is conducted as appropriate or as requested by the Board or a committee.

Stockholder ~~Communication~~Engagement

Our Board and management team value the opinions and feedback of our stockholders, and we engage with stockholders throughout the ~~Board~~year on a variety of issues, including our executive compensation program and corporate governance. Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with us on these or other matters may contact our Investor Relations Department by email at investorrelations@aam.com or by mail at One Dauch Drive, Detroit, Michigan 48211-1198 (corporate address).

Stockholders or other interested parties may communicate with the Board through the Secretary of AAM by e-mail at AAMBoardofDirectors@aam.com or by mail at ~~One Dauch Drive, Detroit, Michigan 48211-1198 or by e-mail at AAMBoardofDirectors@aam.com.~~

the corporate address above. The Board has instructed the Secretary to review all such communications and to exercise his discretion not to forward correspondence to the Board that is inappropriate, such as advertising and business solicitations, routine business matters and personal grievances. However, any director may at any time request the Secretary to forward any communication received by the Secretary on behalf of the Board.

Code of Business Conduct

AAM has adopted a Code of Business Conduct that is designed to assist ~~all~~ AAM associates, executive officers and members of the Board in conducting AAM’s business with the highest standards of ethics and integrity. AAM has also adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our CEO, CFO and other Senior Financial ~~Officers~~Executives (Code of Ethics). The Board annually reviews the Code of Business Conduct and makes updates as appropriate. AAM’s Code of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics are available on our website at http://investor.aam.com. A written copy also may be obtained by any stockholder without charge upon request to the AAM Investor Relations Department by email at investorrelations@aam.com or by mail at ~~One Dauch Drive, Detroit, Michigan 48211-1198 or by email at investorrelations@aam.com.~~our corporate address above.

Related Person Transactions Policy

The Board has adopted a written policy and procedure for the review, approval and ratification of transactions involving AAM and any “related person” as defined in the policy. This policy supplements AAM’s other conflict of interest policies in our Code of Business Conduct. The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing, approving and ratifying all related person transactions in accordance with the policy and the Audit Committee's charter.

For purposes of this policy, a related person transaction includes any transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which AAM is or is expected to be a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a related person has or will have a material interest. A related person includes directors and executive officers and their immediate family members, stockholders owning more than five percent of the Company's outstanding common stock as of the last completed fiscal year, and any entity owned or controlled by any one of these persons.

The Audit Committee makes a determination whether a related person's interest in a transaction is material based on a review of the facts and circumstances. In deciding whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction, the Audit Committee will take into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, (1) whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated ~~third-party~~third party under the same or similar circumstances and (2) the significance of the related person's interest in the transaction.

A member of the Audit Committee may not participate in the review or vote concerning any related person transaction in which the Audit Committee member or his or her immediate family member is involved.

The policy also provides that certain types of transactions are deemed to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee and do not require separate approval or ratification.

During fiscal year ~~2013~~2016 and as of the date of this ~~proxy statement,~~Amendment, the Company has not engaged in any reportable related person transactions.

~~Table of Contents~~

Board and Committee Meetings

Directors are expected to attend all Board meetings, meetings of ~~the~~ committees on which they serve, and stockholder meetings. ~~The~~Directors are expected to spend the time needed and meet as frequently as necessary to properly discharge their responsibilities. During 2016, the Board held four regularly scheduled meetings and ~~two~~five special ~~meetings during 2013.~~meetings. All ~~nominees and~~ continuing directors attended 100% of the Board and applicable committee meetings during ~~2013,~~2016, except one continuing director missed ~~one committee meeting. The 2013~~two Board meetings. No director attended less than 75% of required meetings. Overall attendance at such meetings was approximately 99%. All incumbent directors and nominees attended the 2016 annual meeting of ~~stockholders was attended by eight of the eleven directors on the Board at that time.~~stockholders.

The following table shows committee membership as of ~~March 20, 2014, the date of this proxy statement,~~December 31, 2016 and the number of committee meetings held during ~~2013.~~2016.

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AS OF ~~MARCH 20, 2014~~DECEMBER 31, 2016

Name of Director

Audit

Committee

Compensation

Committee

Nominating/

Corporate

Governance

Committee

Executive

Committee

Technology

Committee

Strategy

Committee

Audit

Committee

Compensation

Committee

Nominating/

Corporate

Governance

Committee

Executive

Committee

Strategy & Technology

Committee

David C. Dauch

Chair

Elizabeth A. Chappell

Chair

Forest J. Farmer

Chair

Steven B. Hantler

Richard C. Lappin

Chair

William. L. Kozyra

Peter D. Lyons

James A. McCaslin

Chair

William P. Miller II

Chair

John F. Smith

Chair

Larry K. Switzer

Samuel Valenti III

Thomas K. Walker

Chair

No. of Meetings in 2013

No. of Meetings in 2016

—

~~The Board approved changes in committee membership effective April 30, 2014 as shown in the table below.~~

~~COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AS OF APRIL 30, 2014~~



~~Name of Director~~	~~Audit~~ ~~Committee~~	~~Compensation~~ ~~Committee~~	~~Nominating/~~ ~~Corporate~~ ~~Governance~~ ~~Committee~~	~~Executive~~ ~~Committee~~	~~Technology~~ ~~Committee~~	~~Strategy~~ ~~Committee~~
~~David C. Dauch~~				~~Chair~~		X
~~Elizabeth A. Chappell~~		~~Chair~~	X
~~Forest J. Farmer~~		X		X
~~Steven B. Hantler~~		X
~~Richard C. Lappin~~			X		X	~~Chair~~
~~James A. McCaslin~~	X	X	~~Chair~~	X	X	X
~~William P. Miller II~~	~~Chair~~		X		X
~~John F. Smith~~	X				~~Chair~~	X
~~Larry K. Switzer~~
~~Samuel Valenti III~~	X					X
~~Thomas K. Walker~~			X	X

~~Table of Contents~~

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility with respect to:

the quality and integrity of our financial statements;

our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

our independent auditors’ qualifications and independence; and

the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditors.

The Audit Committee's responsibilities are more fully described in its written charter, which is available on AAM’s website at http://investor.aam.com.

All members of the Audit Committee are independent and financially literate under NYSE listing standards and independent under our Director Independence Guidelines. The Board has also determined that Mr. Miller and Mr. Smith are "audit committee financial experts" as defined by ~~SEC rules.~~the SEC.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee's responsibilities include the following:

establishing and reviewing AAM’s compensation philosophy and programs for executive officers;

approving executive officer compensation ~~with a view~~that is designed to support achievement of AAM’s business ~~strategies~~strategy and ~~objectives;~~objectives while considering competitive market practices and stockholder interests;

approving corporate goals and objectives for executive officer compensation and evaluating executive officer performance in light of these criteria;

recommending incentive compensation and equity-based plans to the Board;

overseeing management’s risk assessment of the Company’s policies and practices regarding its compensation programs for executive officers and other associates;

recommending non-employee director compensation and benefits to the Board;

overseeing the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) for inclusion in our annual proxy statement; and

producing the Compensation Committee Report for inclusion in our annual proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee's responsibilities are more fully described in its written charter, which is available on our website at http://investor.aam.com.

All Compensation Committee members are independent under NYSE listing standards, including the standards applicable specifically to compensation committee members, and our Director Independence Guidelines. All Compensation Committee members are “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and are "non-employee" directors within the meaning of SEC Rule 16b-3.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices

~~In 2013, AAM management~~We conducted aan annual risk assessment offor the ~~Company’s~~Compensation Committee to determine whether the risks arising from our fiscal year 2016 compensation policies and practices ~~relating~~are reasonably likely to ~~AAM’s compensation programs for executive officers and other associates. The process used by management to conduct~~have a material adverse effect on the ~~risk assessment was approved by the Compensation Committee.~~Company. The risk assessment considered, among other things, AAM’s annual and long-term incentive programs and pay mix, performance measures used to calculate payouts, and pay philosophy and governance. Our annual assessment of compensation-related risks focuses on the program for executive officers in light of their decision-making authority and influence, but also includes a review of the compensation of our other salaried associates. Our risk assessment methodology was reviewed by the Compensation Committee and its independent compensation consultant, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (Meridian).

We have designed our compensation programs, including incentive compensation plans, with specific features to address potential risks while rewarding our executive officers and other associates for achieving long-term financial and strategic objectives through prudent business judgment and appropriate risk taking. The following elements have been incorporated in our programs for executive officers:

A balanced mix of compensation components. The target compensation mix for our executive officers is composed of base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity incentives, representing a mix that is not overly weighted toward short-term cash incentives.

Multiple performance factors. Our annual incentive and long-term incentive plans include multiple measures of performance. Our use of various performance factors diversifies the risk associated with any single aspect of performance. The performance factors and target award opportunities are established in advance by the Compensation Committee in consideration of the Company's performance goals and objectives and stockholder interests.

Long-term incentives. Our long-term incentives are 100% equity-based and have a three-year vesting schedule, which complements our annual cash incentive plan. Sixty-six percent of long-term incentive awards to executive officers are performance-based. These awards are capped at a maximum payout.

Stock ownership requirements. Our executive officers are required to maintain significant share ownership, which aligns their interests with those of our stockholders.

Clawback policy. Our clawback policy authorizes the Compensation Committee to recoup past incentive compensation in the event of a material restatement of the Company's financial results due to fraud or intentional misconduct of an executive officer.

Based on ~~this~~our risk assessment and ~~other~~consideration of various mitigating factors, ~~management~~we concluded that the Company’s compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. ~~The Compensation Committee agreed with management’s conclusion.~~

Role of Management in Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee is responsible for making compensation decisions relative to executive officers. ~~However, in~~In making ~~its~~these decisions, the Compensation Committee seeks and considers input from senior management. Since management has direct involvement with and in-depth knowledge of the business strategy, goals and performance of the Company, certain executive officers play an important role in the executive compensation decision-making process. Senior management participates in the Compensation Committee’s activities in the following specific respects:

The ~~President &~~ CEO provides the Compensation Committee with his evaluation of the performance of the Company’s executive officers, including the other named executive officers (NEOs). The ~~President &~~ CEO and Vice President, Human Resources make compensation recommendations for executive officers, including base salary levels and the amount and mix of incentive awards.

The ~~President &~~ CEO, ~~the Executive~~ Vice President & CFO and the Vice President, Human Resources develop and recommend performance objectives and targets for AAM’s incentive compensation programs.

~~Table of Contents~~

The Vice President, Human Resources assists the Chair of the Compensation Committee in developing meeting agendas and ~~manages~~oversees the preparation ~~and distribution~~ of ~~pre-meeting informational~~meeting materials on the matters to be considered.

The ~~President &~~ CEO, ~~Executive~~President, Vice President & CFO, ~~and~~ the Vice President, Human Resources and the General Counsel, Secretary & Chief Compliance Officer regularly attend Compensation Committee meetings. Management ~~generally~~ does not attend the executive session of the Compensation Committee. ~~On occasion, the Compensation Committee may request certain members of management to attend all or a portion of an executive session.~~

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has retained Meridian ~~Compensation Partners, LLC (Meridian)~~ as its independent compensation consultant. Meridian provides the Compensation Committee with independent advice and ongoing recommendations on compensation matters related to our executive officers and non-employee directors. Meridian also provides the Compensation Committee with competitive market data, peer group analyses and updates on compensation trends and regulatory developments.

In the course of fulfilling its responsibilities, Meridian may communicate directly with the Chair of the Compensation Committee. Meridian also meets with management to gather information, prepare materials, and review proposals to be made to the Compensation Committee. Meridian provides no other services to the Company other than ~~advice with respect to director and executive officer compensation~~those described above, and has no other direct or indirect business relationships with the Company ofor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates.

The Compensation Committee determined that Meridian is independent of management and that the services provided by Meridian to the Compensation Committee do not give rise to ~~any~~ conflicts of interest. In written correspondence to the Compensation Committee, Meridian provided detailed information addressing each of the six independence factors set forth in NYSE listing standards. In this correspondence and in communications with the Compensation Committee, Meridian affirmed its independence and that of its partners, consultants and employees who service the Compensation Committee on executive compensation matters.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s primary responsibilities are to:

identify qualified individuals to serve on the Board and committees;

review our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and recommend changes as appropriate; and

oversee and approve the process for succession planning for the CEO and other executive officers.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee's responsibilities are more fully described in its written charter, which is available on our website at http://investor.aam.com. All members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are independent under NYSE listing standards and our Director Independence Guidelines.

Selection Process for Director Nominees. In consultation with the Chairman ~~President~~ & CEO, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee identifies, evaluates and recommends potential candidates for membership on the Board. ~~The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee~~This committee conducts inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of the candidates and considers questions of independence and possible conflicts of interest. Based on the ~~Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s~~committee’s evaluation, candidates who meet the Board’s criteria may receive further consideration, which may include interviews with the ~~Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee~~committee and other directors. The ~~Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee~~committee then submits its recommendations for nominees to the Board for approval. ~~Pursuant to AAM’s bylaws, the Board may establish the size of the Board by resolution, provided there is a minimum of three members.~~

Before the Board nominates an incumbent director for re-election by our stockholders, the incumbent director is evaluated by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and/or the Board. This evaluation is based on, among other things, each incumbent director’s ~~meeting attendance record and~~ contributions to the activities of the Board.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers recommendations of potential candidates from members of our Board, our Chairman, President & CEO and our stockholders. In 2013, Mr. D.C. Dauch referred director nominee Samuel Valenti III for consideration by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and the Board for election by the Board as a Class III director. After consideration of ~~Mr. Valenti's~~each incumbent Class III director's qualifications and independence, the ~~Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee~~committee recommended that the Board ~~elect~~nominate Mr. McCaslin, Mr. Miller and Mr. Valenti for re-election as a Class III ~~director~~directors, each with a term expiring on the date of the ~~2014~~2020 annual meeting of stockholders. Upon review, the Board ~~elected~~decided to recommend Mr. McCaslin, Mr. Miller and Mr. Valenti ~~effective October 31, 2013, to serve as a Class III director until~~for re-election at the ~~2014~~2017 annual meeting.

~~Table of Contents~~

Director Qualifications. AAM’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide the qualifications for Board membership. Candidates for director nominees to the Board are reviewed in consideration of the current composition of the Board, the operating requirements of the Company and the interests of stockholders. Although specific qualifications may vary from time to time, desired qualities and characteristics include:

high ethical character and shared values with AAM;

~~loyalty to AAM and concern for its success and welfare;~~

high-level leadership experience and achievement at a policy-making level in business, educational or professional activities;

breadth of knowledge of issues affecting AAM;

the ability to contribute special competencies to Board activities, such as financial, technical, international business or other expertise, or industry knowledge;

~~willingness to apply sound, independent business judgment;~~

awareness of a director's vital role in AAM's good corporate citizenship and corporate image; and

sufficient time and availability to effectively carry out a director's duties.

The Board as a whole should reflect the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise and diversity that, when taken together, will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions. Although the Board has no formal policy regarding diversity, the Board believes that diversity is an essential element of Board effectiveness. In this context, diversity is defined broadly to include differences in background, skills, education, experience, gender, race, national origin and culture.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers recommendations of potential candidates from members of our Board, our Chairman & CEO and our stockholders. For director candidates recommended by stockholders, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee follows the procedures described below in Other Matters, Stockholder Proposals for ~~2015~~2018 Annual Meeting. The ~~Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee~~committee will evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders using substantially the same criteria that are considered in evaluating director candidates recommended by our Board members or Chairman ~~President~~ & CEO.

Succession Planning. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s succession planning process for executive officers and other key executive positions at AAM. In performing this role, ~~the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee~~this committee monitors and approves management’s succession planning process and actions and, with respect to the CEO, makes recommendations to the full Board for approval. The Board has primary responsibility for CEO succession planning and develops both long-term and contingency plans for CEO succession. The Company’s long-term and ongoing succession planning program is designed to support effective senior leadership development and succession in a manner that positions AAM to achieve its strategic, operating and financial performance goals, and enhance stockholder value.

Strategy & Technology Committee/Technology Committee

~~The~~In July 2015, the Board created the Strategy & Technology Committee ~~oversees~~ and ~~provides advice~~appointed all Board members to AAM regarding AAM’s product, process and systems technology. The Technology Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board and management concerning AAM's strategy relative to technology matters.

~~Strategy Committee~~

~~The Strategy Committee oversees~~serve on this committee. This committee provided oversight of the development and implementation of AAM’s strategic plan and advice to management on specific strategic opportunities as well as oversight and advice to management regarding product, process and systems technologies. In February 2017, the Board changed the Strategy & Technology Committee to a Technology Committee and appointed the following members: John F. Smith (Chairman), James A. McCaslin, William L. Kozyra and William P. Miller II. The Technology Committee oversees and provides advice and counsel to the ~~Board~~Company on matters relative to product, process and management regarding specific strategic opportunities. The Strategy Committee is responsible for maintaining a cooperative, interactive strategic planning process with management, including the approvalsystems technology. Oversight of strategic ~~goals and objectives and reviewing and providing advice concerning potential corporate acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and strategic alliances.~~matters is the responsibility of the full Board.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee exercises the authority of the Board during the intervals between Board meetings and does not meet on a regular basis.

PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC. 2012 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

Background

Upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board adopted an amended and restated American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan or the Planon February 2, 2017, subject to shareholder approval, which we are now seeking. The Amended and Restated 2012 Plan includes amendments to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan and make certain other changes to the treatment of awards and payouts thereunder. The following material changes will take effect upon adoption of the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan:

The number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan will be increased by 2,100,000 shares. The proposed increase in shares represents approximately 2.7% of the common shares of the Company outstanding as of March 7, 2017 (the record date).

All awards granted under the Plan will be subject to a minimum one year time-based vesting requirement.

Distribution of dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested awards will be prohibited until such awards are vested.

Aggregate cash and equity compensation paid to non-employee directors will be limited to $1,000,000.

Recycling of shares underlying exercised stock options will be prohibited.

The 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan was initially approved by shareholders on April 26, 2012 and most recently amended and restated on April 30, 2015. Under NYSE rules, the proposed amendments to the Plan will not be effective if our shareholders do not approve them. If our shareholders do not approve the proposed Amended and Restated 2012 Plan, we may be required to re-evaluate our compensation structure to ensure that it remains competitive.

We use incentive awards to attract, motivate and retain leadership talent as well as to align our employees’ and non-employee directors’ interests with those of our shareholders. The purpose of the proposed amendments is to allow the Company to award the equity incentives important to our compensation program for the foreseeable future, while resulting in no more than a reasonable amount of potential equity dilution. The Board believes that the proposal to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance is in the best interest of shareholders and supports this proposal for the following reasons:

If the proposed amendment to increase the number of shares available under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan is not approved, the Company will be compelled to increase significantly the cash-based component of employee compensation, which could reduce the alignment of employee and shareholder interests.

The terms of our equity and other annual and long-term incentive compensation awards and our employee policies are designed to protect shareholder interests and encourage employees to focus on the long-term success of the Company.

As has been the Company’s practice, the proposed amendment includes a minimum vesting provision that explicitly imposes a minimum vesting period of one year on all awards, except (i) for certain awards substituted for awards with time-based vesting no less than the award being replaced, (ii) for 5% of the number of shares reserved for future issuance under the Plan as of the date the Plan amendment becomes effective, and (iii) in the event of a termination or qualifying termination of employment on or following a change in control, or due to retirement, death or disability.

The Plan allows for dividends or payments equivalent to dividends to be made with respect to an outstanding award under the Plan, but under the proposed amendment, such payments with respect to unvested awards must be accumulated until such award is earned and vested. Distribution of dividends or dividend equivalents accumulated

with respect to an outstanding award will not be made if performance and time-based vesting conditions have not been satisfied.

The new non-employee director pay limit under the proposed amendment provides that the aggregate maximum grant date fair market value of shares with respect to awards granted to under the Plan in any calendar year to any non-employee director, when added to any other compensation paid to such non-employee director in respect of such year, shall not exceed $1,000,000.

Consistent with best practice, the proposed amendment prohibits using the following shares again for grant under the Plan: (i) shares not issued or delivered as a result of net settlement of an outstanding option or stock appreciation right (SAR), (ii) shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the exercise price of or withholding taxes with respect to an option, and (iii) shares repurchased with proceeds from the payment of the exercise price of an option.

Summary of Amended and Restated 2012 Plan as Proposed to Be Amended

The description of the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan in this document is only a summary. Capitalized terms not defined in this summary shall have the meaning given in the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan. We encourage you to read the entire Plan to understand all of its terms. A copy of the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan has been provided as Appendix A to this proxy statement. In addition, we will send to you, without charge, a copy of the Plan upon your request. You may send your request to: Investor Relations, American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., One Dauch Drive, Detroit, Michigan 48211-1198

Purpose and Eligibility

The purpose of the Plan is to foster and promote the long-term financial success of the Company and materially increase shareholder value by (a) motivating superior performance by means of performance-related incentives, (b) encouraging and providing the means for employees and non-employee directors to obtain an ownership interest in the Company, and (c) attracting and retaining qualified persons to serve as members of an outstanding management team and as Board members whose judgment, interest and performance are required for the successful and sustained operations of the Company.

All employees and non-employee directors of the Company and its subsidiaries and designated affiliates are eligible to participate in the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan. The ability of our employees and non-employee directors to participate in the Plan is subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee. Approximately 200 employees and non-employee directors may be eligible to participate in the Plan. In addition, the Compensation Committee may select third-party service providers to the Company or any subsidiary to participate in the Plan.

Termination Date

No Awards may be made after ten years from the effective date of the original plan on April 26, 2012.

Administration of the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan

The Compensation Committee will administer the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan and will have the discretion to select the individuals who receive Awards (Participants) and determine the form and terms of the Awards, including any vesting, exercisability, payment or other restrictions. Subject to certain limitations, the Compensation Committee may delegate some or all of its authority to one or more Plan administrators, including members of the Compensation Committee, officers of the Company or selected advisors.

Limits on Awards

The Amended and Restated 2012 Plan limits the grants of Awards to a single Participant in any calendar year as follows:

the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be granted in the form of stock options and SARs is 2,000,000 shares.

the maximum aggregate payout at the end of an applicable performance period or vesting period with respect to Awards of performance shares, performance units (settled in shares), restricted shares or restricted stock units (settled in shares) is 2,000,000 shares, determined as of the date of grant; and

The maximum aggregate amount that may be paid under an Award of performance units (settled in cash), cash-based Awards or any other Award that is payable in cash, in each case that are performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code), is $6,000,000, determined as of the date of payout.

The Amended and Restated 2012 Plan limits the grants of Awards to a single non-employee director in any calendar year as follows:

The aggregate maximum grant date fair market value of shares that may be granted under the Plan in any calendar year to any non-employee director, when added to any other compensation paid to such non-employee director in respect of such year, shall not exceed $1,000,000.

Shares Available under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan

The total number of shares that may be delivered under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan will be 9,200,000 shares of our authorized but unissued shares of common stock (which takes into account the proposed 2,100,000 share increase), subject to adjustment for share recycling. The number of shares available under the Plan will be equitably adjusted to reflect certain transactions, including, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, separation, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split up or spin-off.

Share Recycling Rules

The number of shares subject to any portion of an Award granted under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan that is canceled or that expires without having been settled in shares will be available for new Awards. If shares are tendered or withheld to pay the exercise price of a stock option award, to satisfy a tax withholding obligation with respect to an option, as a result of the net settlement of an option or SAR, or repurchased with proceeds from the payment of the exercise price of an option, such tendered or withheld shares will not be available for new Awards under the Plan.

Types of Awards Allowed under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan

Form of Awards. The Amended and Restated 2012 Plan authorizes the following awards (Awards): (i) restricted stock or restricted stock units; (ii) performance shares; (iii) performance units; (iv) stock options; (v) SARs; (vi) cash-based awards; and (vii) other forms of equity-based or equity-related Awards which the Compensation Committee determines to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan.

Each grant of an Award will be evidenced by an Award agreement that will set forth the terms and conditions of the grant as determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. These terms and conditions may include, but are not limited to, restrictions on transferability and the continued employment of the grantee, performance or other conditions, if any, that must be satisfied before all or part of the applicable restrictions or vesting periods lapse, the applicable performance conditions, if any, the duration of the exercise period, if any, and the effect of terminations of employment and change in control. The terms and conditions need not be uniform among all grants of Awards, form of Awards or Participants.

Transferability. Unless otherwise permitted by the Compensation Committee, no Award will be transferable other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. During the lifetime of a Participant, stock options and SARs will be exercisable only by the Participant.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock Awards are outstanding shares of common stock that the Compensation Committee may make subject to restrictions on transfer, vesting requirements or cancellation under specified circumstances. A Participant granted restricted stock generally has most of the rights of a shareholder, including the right to receive dividends and the right to vote such shares.

Upon satisfaction of the terms and conditions of the Award, a restricted stock unit will be payable in common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value on the payment date of one share of common stock, as specified in the Award agreement. As a holder of restricted stock units, a Participant will have only the rights of a general unsecured creditor of the Company. A Participant will not be a shareholder with respect to the shares underlying restricted stock units unless and until the restricted stock units convert to shares of common stock. However, the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may provide for the payment of dividend equivalents with respect to restricted stock units.

Performance Shares and Performance Units. Performance shares and performance units are Awards based upon the attainment of certain performance criteria over a performance period specified by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Each performance share shall have an initial value equal to one share of common stock. Each performance unit shall have an initial notional value equal to a dollar amount as established by the Compensation Committee, in its discretion. Performance shares and performance units may be settled in cash, in shares or a combination thereof. Performance shares and performance units may but are not required to comply with the requirements of Code Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee may elect to utilize performance measures that are not specified in the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan with respect to performance shares and performance units not intended to comply with Code Section 162(m).

Stock Options and SARs

General. Stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock in the future at a specified exercise price set by the Compensation Committee. Stock options may be either nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options (ISOs) granted pursuant to Code Section 422. Upon satisfaction of the conditions to exercisability, a Participant may exercise a stock option and receive the number of shares of common stock in respect of which the stock option is exercised. Upon satisfaction of the conditions to payment, each SAR will entitle a Participant to an amount, if any, equal to the amount by which the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of exercise exceeds the SAR exercise price. At the discretion of the Compensation Committee, SARs may be payable in common stock, cash or a combination thereof.

Exercise Price. The exercise price of stock options and SARs awarded under the Plan may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of one share of common stock on the grant date. The exercise price of a stock option may be paid in cash, by tendering previously acquired shares, by a cashless (broker assisted) exercise, through net share settlement involving the withholding of shares subject to the stock option or any other method approved by the Compensation Committee.

Maximum Term of Stock Options and SARs. No stock option or SAR may have an expiration date that is later than the tenth anniversary of the Award date. No ISO granted to a Participant who owns more than 10% of our stock may have an expiration date that is later than the fifth anniversary of the grant date.

Other Stock-Based and Cash-Based Awards.The Compensation Committee may grant other forms of cash-based and stock-based Awards not specifically described in the Plan including, but not limited to, unrestricted shares, deferred shares and deferred share units.

162(m) Performance-Based Compensation

The Compensation Committee may designate any Award (other than an Option or SAR) as performance-based compensation upon grant, in each case based upon a determination that (i) the Participant is or may be a covered employee, within the meaning of Code Section 162(m), with respect to such Award, and (ii) the Committee wishes such Award to qualify for exemption from the limitation on deductibility under Code Section 162(m)(4)(c). The Compensation Committee shall have the sole authority to specify which Awards are to be granted in compliance with Code Section 162(m) and treated as performance-based compensation.

For each grant of an Award designated as performance-based compensation, the Compensation Committee will establish the terms and conditions of the grant in accordance with the requirements of Code Section 162(m), including, but not limited to, the size of the Award, performance measures and related performance goals, the performance period over which performance goals must be achieved, payout levels based on achieved goals, form and timing and payout, and the impact of a termination of employment and change in control. At the end of the performance period, the Compensation Committee will determine the degree of achievement of the performance goals that will determine the payout. No Award of performance-based compensation will be earned, vested or paid

until the Compensation Committee certifies the attainment of the pre-established performance goals. The Compensation Committee may set performance goals using any combination of the following performance measures that are set forth in the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan:

(a) Book value or earnings per share;

(b) Cash flow, free cash flow or operating cash flow;

(d) Expenses/costs;

(e) Gross, net or pre-tax income (aggregate or on a per share basis);

(f) Net income as a percentage of sales;

(g) Book value or earnings per share;

(h) Gross or net sales or revenues;

(i) Gross profit or gross margin;

(j) Improvements in capital structure, cost of capital or debt reduction;

(k) Market share or market share penetration;

(l) Growth in managed assets;

(m) Reduction of losses, loss ratios and expense ratios;

(n) Asset turns, inventory turns or fixed asset turns;

(o) Operation performance measures;

(p) Profitability ratios (pre or post tax);

(q) Profitability of an identifiable business unit or product;

(r) Return measures (including return on assets, return on equity, return on investment, return on capital, return on invested capital, gross profit return on investment, gross margin return on investment, economic value added or similar metric);

(s) Share price (including growth or appreciation in share price and total shareholder return);

(t) Strategic business objectives (including objective project milestones);

(u) Transactions relating to acquisitions or divestitures; or

(v) Working capital.

Any performance measure(s) may, as the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion deems appropriate, (i) relate to the performance of the Company or any subsidiary as a whole or any business unit or division of the Company or any subsidiary or any combination thereof, (ii) be compared to the performance of a group of comparator companies, or published or special index, (iii) be based on change in the performance measure over a specified period of time and such change may be measured based on an arithmetic change over the specified period (e.g., cumulative change or average change), or percentage change over the specified period (e.g., cumulative percentage change, average percentage change or compounded percentage change), (iv) relate to or be compared to one or more other performance measures, or (v) any combination of the foregoing. The

Compensation Committee also has the authority to provide for accelerated vesting of any Award based on the achievement of performance goals pursuant to the performance measures specified above.

The Performance Measures shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied on a business unit, divisional, subsidiary or consolidated basis or any combination thereof. The Compensation Committee may provide in any Award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude the impact, if any, on reported financial results of any of the following events that occurs during a Performance Period: (a) asset write-downs, (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (c) changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions, (d) reorganization or restructuring programs, (e) acquisitions or divestitures, (f) foreign exchange gains and losses, and (g) gains and losses that are treated as unusual or infrequently occurring items within the meaning of the accounting standards of the Financial Accounting Standard Board or such comparable successor term.

Types of Awards Allowed for Non-employee Directors under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan

Our non-employee directors generally may receive Awards under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan similar to those granted to other Participants. The Board may provide that all or a portion of a non-employee director’s annual retainer and/or retainer fees or other Awards or compensation be payable in non-qualified stock options, restricted shares and restricted stock units, either automatically or at the choice of the non-employee directors. The Board will determine the terms and conditions of any such Awards, including those that apply upon the termination of a non-employee director’s service as a member of the Board. Non-employee directors are also eligible to receive other Awards pursuant to the terms of the Plan, including options and SARs, restricted shares and restricted stock units and deferred stock units, upon such terms as the Board may determine. With respect to Awards made to non-employee directors, the Plan will be administered by our Board.

Amendment of the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan

Our Board may amend the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan and any Award made under the Plan at any time for any reason or no reason, except that our Board must obtain shareholder approval if shareholder approval is required in order to comply with the listing or other requirements of any securities exchange on which shares of the Company are listed or are desired to be listed or to comply with applicable U.S. or state laws, or regulations and the law of any foreign country or jurisdiction where Awards are granted under the Plan. No termination, amendment or suspension of the Plan and any Award made under the Plan may adversely affect in any material way any Award previously granted under the Plan without the written consent of the Award recipient, subject to certain conditions described in the Plan.

Treatment of Awards under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan in the Event of a Change in Control of the Company

A "change in control" is generally defined in the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan as:

The acquisition by a person unaffiliated with the Company of beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the voting power of the Company's outstanding voting securities that may be cast for the election of directors;

The occurrence of certain mergers, consolidations, cash tender or exchange offers, sale of assets or similar forms of corporation transactions resulting in the transfer of 50% or more of the total voting power of the Company's outstanding securities that may be cast for the election of directors;

A change in the composition of a majority of the Company's Board over a period of two consecutive years (if the new directors are not approved by the incumbent Board); or

The approval by the shareholders of a plan or proposal for the Company's dissolution.

Disposition of Awards Upon Change in Control

Subject to the minimum vesting period of one year, if a Participant has in effect an employment, retention, change in control, severance or similar agreement with the Company or any subsidiary or is subject to a policy or plan that discusses the effect of a change in control on a Participant’s awards, then such agreement, plan or policy shall

govern. In all other cases, unless provided otherwise in an Award agreement or by the Compensation Committee prior to the date of the change in control, in the event of a change in control:

Award Assumed by Successor. If a Successor agrees, some or all outstanding awards will either be assumed, or replaced with awards of the same type with similar terms and conditions, by a Successor in the transaction. In the event of termination following a change in control, the Plan provides for double-trigger vesting acceleration. Subject to the minimum vesting period of one year, if the Participant's employment with a Successor terminates in connection with or within two years following the change in control for any reason other than an involuntary termination by a Successor for cause or a voluntary termination by the Participant without good reason, then all of the Participant’s awards that are in effect will be vested in full or deemed earned in full (assuming the target performance goals provided under the award were met, if applicable) effective on the date of the Participant’s termination of employment.

Reimbursement of Cancelled Awards. Subject to the minimum vesting period of one year,if a Successor does not assume the awards or issue replacement awards, then, unless provided otherwise in an award agreement or by the Compensation Committee, immediately prior to the date of the change in control all awards that are then held by Participants will be cancelled in exchange for the right to receive the following:

For each stock option or SAR, a cash payment equal to the excess of the change in control price of the shares covered by the stock option or SAR over the purchase or grant price of such shares;

For each share of restricted stock and each restricted stock unit, a cash payment equal to the change in control price per share or such other consideration as the Company or shareholders receive as a result of the change in control;

For each performance share and/or performance share unit that has been earned but no yet paid, a cash payment equal to the value of the performance share and/or performance unit;

For each performance share and/or performance unit for which the performance period has not yet expired, a cash payment equal to the product of (x) and (y) where (x) is the Award the Participant would have earned based on target performance and (y) is a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of calendar months the Participant was employed by the Company during the performance period (any partial month counts as a full month) and the denominator of which is the number of months in the performance period;

For all other Awards that are earned but not yet paid, a cash payment equal to the value of the other Awards;

For all other Awards that are not yet earned, a cash payment equal to either the amount that would have been due under such Award(s) if any performance goals (as measured at the time of the change in control) were to be achieved at the target level through the end of the performance period or a cash payment based on the value of the Award as of the date of the change in control; and

For all dividend equivalents, a cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents as of the date of the change in control.

Treatment of Awards upon a Participant’s Termination of Employment

The Compensation Committee will determine at or after the time of grant, the terms and conditions that apply to any Award upon a Participant’s termination of employment with the Company and its subsidiaries. Subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations, as well as the minimum vesting period of one year, in connection with a Participant’s termination, the Compensation Committee shall have the discretion to accelerate the vesting, exercisability or settlement of, eliminate the restrictions and conditions applicable to, or extend the post-termination exercise period of an outstanding Award.

Federal Tax Consequences of the Awards Granted under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan

The following is a brief summary of the United States federal income tax consequences related to Awards granted under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan:

Restricted Stock Units. The grant of restricted stock units will not result in the recognition of taxable income by the Participant or in a deduction to the Company. Upon settlement of restricted stock units, the Participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the then fair market value of the shares of common stock, or cash, distributed at the time of settlement and a corresponding deduction will be allowable to the Company (subject to Code Section 162(m)). If settled in shares, the Participant’s tax basis in the shares will equal the amount taxed as ordinary income, and on subsequent disposition the Participant will realize a capital gain or loss (long-term or short-term, depending upon the holding period of the shares sold).

Restricted Stock. The grant of restricted stock will not result in the recognition of taxable income by the Participant or in a deduction to the Company, unless the Participant makes the special election with the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to Code Section 83(b). Upon lapse of the risk of forfeiture or restrictions on transferability applicable to a grant of restricted stock, the Participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the then fair market value of the shares subject to the grant and a corresponding deduction will be allowable to the Company (subject to Code Section 162(m)). The Participant’s tax basis in the shares will be equal to the ordinary income recognized. Upon subsequent disposition of the shares, the Participant will realize long-term or short-term capital gain or loss.

Pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code, the Participant may elect within 30 days of receipt of the Award to be taxed at ordinary income tax rates on the fair market value of the shares comprising such Award at the time of Award (determined without regard to any restrictions which may lapse) less any amount paid for the shares. In that case, the Participant will acquire a tax basis in the shares equal to the ordinary income recognized by the Participant at the time of Award. No tax will be payable upon the lapse or release of the restrictions or at the time the shares first become transferable, and any gain or loss upon subsequent disposition will be a capital gain or loss. In the event of a forfeiture of shares of common stock with respect to which a Participant previously made a Section 83(b) election, the Participant will generally not be entitled to a loss deduction.

Nonqualified Stock Options. The grant of a nonqualified stock option will not result in the recognition of taxable income by the Participant or in a deduction to the Company. Upon exercise, a Participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock purchased over the exercise price, and a tax deduction is allowable to the Company equal to the amount of such income (subject to Code Section 162(m)). Gain or loss upon a subsequent sale of any shares received upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option generally would be taxed as capital gain or loss (long-term or short-term, depending upon the holding period of the shares sold). Certain additional rules apply if the exercise price for an option is paid in shares previously owned by the Participant.

ISOs. Upon the grant or exercise of an ISO within the meaning of Code Section 422, no income will be realized by the Participant for federal income tax purposes and the Company will not be entitled to any deduction. However, the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock as of the date of exercise over the exercise price will constitute an adjustment to taxable income for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. If the shares are not disposed of within the one-year period beginning on the date of the transfer of such shares to the Participant or within the two-year period beginning on the date of grant of the stock option, any profit realized by the Participant upon the disposition of such shares will be taxed as long-term capital gain and no deduction will be allowed to the Company. If the shares are disposed of within the one-year period from the date of transfer of such shares to the Participant or within the two-year period from the date of grant of the stock option, the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise or, if less, the fair market value on the date of disposition, over the exercise price will be taxable as ordinary income to the Participant at the time of disposition, and a corresponding deduction will be allowable to the Company. Certain additional rules apply if the exercise price for a stock option is paid in shares previously owned by the Participant.

SARs.The grant of SARs will not result in the recognition of taxable income by the Participant or in a deduction to the Company. Upon exercise, a Participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the then fair market value of the shares of common stock or cash distributed to the Participant. The Company is entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount of such income (subject to Code Section 162(m)). Gain or loss upon a subsequent sale of any shares received upon the exercise of SARs generally would be taxed as capital gain or loss (long-term or short-term, depending upon the holding period of the shares sold).

Code Section 162(m) generally disallows a public company from taking a tax deduction for compensation paid in excess of $1,000,000 in any tax year to its chief executive officer and three most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief financial officer. However, compensation that qualifies as performance-based is

excluded from this $1,000,000 deduction limit and therefore remains fully deductible by the Company. The Company generally intends that Awards under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan qualify as performance-based compensation so that these Awards will not be subject to the Code Section 162(m) deduction limit. However, if the Compensation Committee determines that it is in the Company’s best interest, compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m) may be paid to a Participant in the Compensation Committee’s sole discretion.

The foregoing discussion is general in nature and is not intended to be a complete description of the United States federal income tax consequences of the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan. This discussion does not address the effects of other federal taxes or taxes imposed under state, local or foreign tax laws. Participants in the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan are urged to consult a tax advisor as to the tax consequences of participation.

New Plan Benefits

No awards have been granted, and no shares have been issued, on the basis of the proposed 2,100,000 share increase. Future grants under the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan will be made at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and, accordingly, are not yet determinable. In addition, the value of the awards granted under the Plan will depend on a number of factors, including the fair market value of our common stock on future dates and the exercise decisions made by the participants. Consequently, it is not possible to determine the benefits that might be received by participants receiving discretionary grants under the Common Stock.

Equity Compensation Plan Information as of March 15, 2017

The following table provides information as of March 15, 2017, regarding the shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans. This table does not reflect the additional shares proposed to be added to the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan in Proposal 2.



	A	B	C	D
Plan Category	Number of Securities to be issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1) (#)	Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(2) ($)	Weighted Average Remaining Term of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(3) (#)	Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column A) (#)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders	3,298,628	9.27	1.37	1,934,297
Equity Compensation Plans not Approved by Shareholders	-	-	-	-

~~Table~~

(1) Includes 2,095,838 outstanding full value restricted stock unit awards, 110,200 stock options and 1,092,590 outstanding performance share awards at target.

(2) Represents the weighted average exercise price of ~~Contents~~outstanding stock options.

(3) Represents the weighted average remaining term of outstanding stock options.

Recent Closing Price of the Company’s Common Stock

The closing price of our common stock on March 7, 2017, the record date, was $19.35 per share.

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the proposal to approve the Amended and Restated American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

~~The Compensation Committee (Committee) oversees the Company's executive compensation program.~~ Our executive compensation program reflects an externally competitive compensation structure based on a ~~comprehensive~~ market study of executive compensation programs in AAM's comparative peer group. In addition to attracting and retaining key executives, ~~the~~our program is designed to drive Company and individual performance while aligning the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

~~Stockholder Outreach~~

At our 2013 annual meeting, 58% of our stockholders voted in favor of the Company's say on pay proposal. This result was considerably less favorable than the level of support AAM received for its 2012 and 2011 say on pay proposals, which was 95% and 98%, respectively. As a result of this outcome, the Board directed senior management to conduct stockholder outreach to gain an understanding of stockholder concerns about our executive compensation programs. The Board and the Committee believe that direct feedback from our stockholders is valuable in evaluating possible changes to our executive compensation programs in In order to ~~further align AAM's compensation programs and practices with the objectives of our stockholders.~~

Senior management contacted our top 25 institutional stockholders, representing approximately two-thirds of the total shares outstanding, to discuss the outcome of the 2013 vote. Nine of these investors agreed to meet with us. During the fall of 2013, senior management had discussions with these investors, which included eight of AAM's top 15 institutional holders.The dialog with these stockholders was open, positive and constructive. The key areas of concern expressed by these stockholders included the following:

~~composition of our comparative peer group and the need for clear, descriptive disclosures regarding the criteria used to select companies in our comparative peer group;~~


•	~~the importance of setting the target level of total executive compensation at the 50~~^th ~~percentile;~~

•~~lack of performance-based equity incentive compensation;~~

~~the importance of pay-for-performance alignment of CEO compensation;~~

~~the lack of a formal clawback policy; and~~

~~compensation of Co-Founder and former Executive Chairman (now deceased).~~

Throughout the outreach process, management reported the feedback received from our stockholders to the Board and the Committee. In consideration of this feedback and the written comments of proxy advisory firms, the Committee reviewed our compensation program and practices for executive officers, including our named executive officers (NEOs). In conducting this review, the Committee received advice from its independent compensation consultant and input from senior management and the Board. As a result, the Committee made changes toensure that our executive compensation program ~~as described below.~~

~~Key Changes to Executive Compensation Program~~

~~Approved a new comparative peer group for benchmarking executive compensation~~. ~~The Committee approved a new comparative peer group, which has greater relevance to AAM~~drives performance in terms of industry, revenues, market capitalization, global complexity and competition. AAM's projected 2014 revenues approximate the median 2014 projected revenues of the new comparative peer group. The size of the comparative peer group was reduced from 38 to 20 companies.

•

~~Targeted the 50th percentile for total compensation of executive officers. In determining 2014 compensation, the Committee targeted total compensation at approximately the 50~~^th ~~percentile of our new comparative peer group. As a result, the Committee has moved away from setting annual and long-term incentive pay opportunities between the 50~~^th ~~and 75~~^th percentile of our comparative peer group. This total compensation target is considered to be a generally accepted benchmark of external competitiveness that supports AAM's ability to attract and retain key executives.

~~Introduced a performance share award vehicle as a component of long-term incentive compensation~~. Stockholders commented that our long-term incentive (LTI) program should include performance-based equity awards. Historically, our LTI program was comprised of 50% cash-based performance awards and 50% restricted stock units (RSUs) with time-based vesting. The Committee redesigned the LTI program to strengthen pay-for-performance alignment of executive compensation. For 2014, the Committee

~~Table of Contents~~

introduced performance share awards that account for 66% of the total LTI award value. The payouts earned under these awards will be measured by EBITDA margin and relative TSR performance over a three-year period and paid only to the extent that pre-established performance targets are achieved. The Committee decided that the remaining 34% of the LTI equity awards should be in the form of RSUs with three-year cliff vesting in order to promote the retention of key executives. This new LTI design, which is 100% equity-based, further aligns the interests of executive officers with thosesupport of our ~~stockholders.~~

~~Capped annual incentive performance metrics~~. A 2013 report from a proxy advisory firm noted that a performance metric used in determining annual incentive award payouts -- net income as a percentage of sales (NIPS) -- did not have a stated maximum payout. Although the award opportunity for this metric was practically limited by its direct link to actual Company performance, the Committee considered this comment while setting financial targets for 2014 annual incentive award opportunities. Accordingly, the Committee established a stated maximum payout for the NIPS performance metric. As a result, all performance metrics for annual incentivestrategic principles and cultural values, we regularly compare our compensation ~~have stated maximum payouts.~~

~~Adopted a clawback policy~~. The Committee adopted a clawback policy applicable to executive officers effective January 1, 2014. Generally, if the Committee determines that an executive officer engaged in fraud or intentional misconduct that resulted in a material restatement of our financial statements, the Committee may seek to recover performance-based incentive compensation to the extent such compensation is based on the financial performance of the Companypractices and ~~if other criteria are met.~~

~~Eliminated discretionary bonuses to the former Executive Chairman~~governance against market best practices and ~~other NEOs~~. Stockholders expressed concern regarding the 2012 discretionary bonus paid to Mr. R.E. Dauch (now deceased). Mr. R.E. Dauch's 2012 bonus was determined under his prior employment agreement, which provided for the use of discretion in assessing performance and determining the annual bonus payout. Beginning in 2013, under his 2012 employment agreement, Mr. R.E. Dauch's annual incentive was calculated based on the Company's achievement of financial targets set by the Committee in advance of the performance period. These performance metrics were approved by our stockholders under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. No discretionary increases were made to 2013 annual incentive payouts for Mr. R.E. Dauch or any of our other NEOs.

We believe that the above changes to our executive compensation program address the concerns raised by the 2013 advisory vote on executive compensation and by our stockholders. The Company is committed to further engagement with our stockholders regarding executive compensation and related matters. We believe that these discussions are a valuable component of our overall investor relations program. The Committee will continue to consider ~~feedback from our stockholders in determining AAM's executive compensation programs and practices.~~stockholder feedback.

~~2013 Performance~~

In 2013, our financial performance was highlighted by sales growth that outpaced the industry and profitability that solidly rebounded from our 2012 performance. The performance goals under our executive compensation programs are established to reward achievement of the Company's goals and objectives. The 2013 payouts of annual and cash-based long-term incentives as compared to incentive payouts for 2012 reflect this pay-for-performance alignment. As discussed in more detail below, improvements in the Company's performance for 2013 resulted in higher incentive payouts for certain awards as compared to 2012 payments. For example, our achievements related to net operating cash flow and relative TSR resulted in higher incentive payouts for 2013 as compared to 2012. This result supports AAM's compensation objectives of rewarding performance and aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders.

~~Leadership Changes - NEOs~~

On August 2, 2013, Richard E. Dauch, the Company's Co-Founder and Executive Chairman, passed away. Effective August 16, 2013, the Board appointed President & Chief Executive Officer David C. Dauch as Chairman of the Board. Mr. D.C. Dauch has served as AAM’s President & CEO since September 2012.

John J. Bellanti, AAM's Executive Vice President, Worldwide Operations, retired from AAM effective January 1, 2014. Upon Mr. Bellanti's retirement, Alberto L. Satine became Senior Vice President, Global Driveline Operations, assuming leadership responsibility for a significant portion of our global operations. Previously, Mr. Satine served as AAM's Group Vice President, Global Sales & Business Development and held numerous positions of increasing responsibility since he joined AAM in May 2001.

~~Table of Contents~~

Named Executive Officers

Our NEOs for the fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2013 include the following individuals whose titles shown below are the positions held as of that date (except for Mr. R.E. Dauch):~~2016 are:

David C. Dauch, Chairman ~~President~~ & Chief Executive Officer;

~~Michael K. Simonte, Executive~~Christopher J. May, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer;

~~John J. Bellanti, Executive Vice President, Worldwide Operations;~~Michael K. Simonte, President;

Alberto L. Satine, ~~Group Vice~~ President ~~Global Sales & Business Development;~~Driveline; and

Norman Willemse, ~~Vice~~ President Metal Formed Products

2016 Highlights

AAM Performance

AAM had an outstanding year in 2016. The year brought record profit and sales, operational excellence, technology advancement and a strategic initiative that will help position AAM to meet future customer and market demands. During the year, our team worked to continue to diversify our revenue base and improve our capital structure. Business ~~Unit;~~diversification fueled by growth in key global vehicle segments has contributed to our record profitability and strong operating cash flow. By meaningfully strengthening the balance sheet and reducing our debt leverage, we are positioned for both organic growth initiatives and strategic opportunities. The following highlights AAM's sales and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) performance, excluding the impact of restructuring and acquisition-related costs and non-recurring items (Adjusted EBITDA). For a reconciliation of adjusted measures to measures reported under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, see Reconciliation of Non-GAAP and GAAP Information below.

~~Richard E. Dauch, Co-Founder~~




(in millions)

In November 2016, AAM announced the proposed acquisition of Metaldyne Performance Group Inc. (MPG). The combination will bring together highly complementary businesses and ~~former Executive Chairman (deceased).~~form a premier, global Tier 1 supplier with broad capabilities across powertrain, drivetrain and driveline product lines, as well as a diversified customer base and end-markets.

~~Although Mr. R.E. Dauch passed away during 2013, he~~

Pay for Performance

AAM's compensation philosophy is ~~identified as an NEO based on his 2013~~to pay for performance, support the Company's business strategies and offer market competitive compensation. Our ~~discussion~~compensation programs consist of complementary elements that reward achievement of both short-term and long-term objectives. The metrics used for our incentive programs are either associated with operating performance or based upon relative total shareholder return (TSR). The 2016 incentive payouts for our NEOs reflect an overall pay-for-performance alignment as shown below. This result supports AAM's compensation objectives of rewarding performance and aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders.



2016 Annual Incentive Performance Metrics

The graphic shown above highlights 2016 net operating cash flow and operating income margin performance, the two metrics by which NEO annual incentive awards were measured. Actual operating income margin excludes the impact of restructuring and acquisition-related costs. Net operating cash flow was adjusted to exclude cash payments for restructuring and acquisition-related costs. Based on these metrics, total NEO target annual incentive opportunity of $3.1 million resulted in total payouts of $6.2 million.

Long-Term Incentive Performance Metrics

The graphic shown above highlights cumulative EBITDA and relative TSR for the three year period ending December 31, 2016. These two metrics were used to measure performance under the 2014 long-term incentive performance share awards. Three year cumulative EBITDA excludes the impact of a settlement charge related to certain terminated vested participants under our defined benefit plans and restructuring and acquisition-related costs. Based on these metrics, the NEOs received a 0% payout on the relative TSR award and a 191% payout on the EBITDA award.

Results of 2016 Say-on-Pay Vote

At our 2016 annual meeting, over 97% of the votes cast were in favor of the Company's say-on-pay proposal. The Compensation Committee (Committee) and the Board considered this favorable outcome as a reflection of our stockholders' strong support of the overall executive compensation ~~programs throughout the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) applies generally to~~program for our ~~NEOs, except for Mr. R.E. Dauch. His compensation is described separately under~~ NEOs.

~~Compensation of former Executive Chairman~~ ~~below~~What we do....

Emphasize performance-based compensation

A substantial majority of total direct compensation is variable and at risk

Mix of annual and long-term incentives balances the focus between achievement of short-term results and long-term share appreciation

Annual incentive payouts are directly linked to achievement of short-term financial measures

Long-term incentive compensation is 66% performance based

Long-term incentives are designed to drive the Company's long-term success, profitability and growth

Use an independent compensation consultant and peer group analysis

Independent compensation consultant annually performs market study of pay and best practices

Compensation consultant provides independent advice to the Compensation Committee


•	Total direct compensation targeted at 50^thpercentile of pay among our peer group

Mitigate undue risk in compensation programs

All incentive award payouts are capped

A risk assessment of compensation programs is performed annually

Clawback policy ensures accountability

Enforce stock ownership requirements for executive officers

CEO stock ownership requirements are 6 times annual base salary

Other NEO stock ownership requirements are 2 to 3 times annual base salary

Utilize double-trigger change-in-control plan

Severance payments and vesting of equity awards require both a change in control and a qualifying termination of employment

What we don't do....

No hedging or pledging of Company stock

No excise tax gross-ups

No excessive perquisites

No excessive change-in-control or executive severance provisions

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Committee ~~is responsible for establishing and reviewing~~determines the overall compensation philosophy of the Company. The Committee believes that the compensation paid to AAM executives should be structured to provide ~~AAM executives~~them with meaningful rewards, while maintaining alignment with stockholder interests, ~~corporate~~our cultural values and ~~management initiatives.~~

~~The Committee believes that~~strategic principles. Accordingly, AAM’s executive compensation program ~~should consist~~consists of a mix of base salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation, with limited perquisites and other personal benefits. ~~One of the key objectives of establishing a mix of base salaries, annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation is to have a~~A significant portion of total direct compensation beis performance-based and contingent upon the achievement of stated Company performance goals.

The Committee also considers other factors in setting compensation levels for NEOs such as Company and individual performance, succession planning and the requirements of the position as determined by the Company from time to time.

Compensation Objectives. The following ~~fundamental~~ objectives are considered in determining compensation programs and pay levels for our ~~NEOs.~~NEOs:

Compensation and benefit programs should attract, motivate and retain experienced executives who are vital to our short-term and long-term success, profitability and growth. AAM makes an effort to remain competitive by targeting ~~competitive~~ pay levels ~~based on the Company’s~~of our comparative peer group while considering ~~the Company's business environment, including~~ industry conditions and other market influences. ~~The Committee believes our~~Our compensation programs should encourage high-achieving, marketable executives to remain motivated and committed to AAM for long and productive careers.

Compensation and benefit programs should reward Company and individual performance. Our compensation programs ~~should~~ strive to deliver competitive compensation for exceptional individual and Company performance as compared to companies in our comparative peer group. As ~~associates~~executives progress to higher ~~levels in the Company and assume key~~level leadership positions, a greater portion of their compensation ~~should be~~is linked to

Company performance measured against financial and operational objectives and to stockholder returns.

Compensation and benefit programs should foster the long-term focus required to deliver value to our stockholders. ~~We believe that~~Our long-term incentive compensation ~~will motivate~~program motivates executive officers to achieve our strategic objectives and deliver long-term value creation to our stockholders. ~~Executives~~Executive officers who ~~are in positions to~~ influence ~~longer-term~~long-term results ~~should~~ have a greater proportion of their compensation tied to ~~longer-term~~long-term performance.

Total compensation opportunities should reflect each executive’s level of responsibility and contribution to AAM. While the overall structure of compensation and benefit programs should be

~~Table of Contents~~

broadly similar across the Company, individual pay levels and benefit packages will reflect differences in job responsibilities, geography and marketplace considerations.

Stock ownership requirements for executive officers should align their interests with those of our stockholders. ~~Stock~~Our stock ownership ~~aligns~~requirements align our executive officers’ interests with those of stockholders and ~~reinforces~~reinforce the importance of making sound long-term decisions. AAM’s executive officers are required to maintain a certain level of stock ownership based on their position.

Peer Group and Compensation Benchmarking

Determination of Comparative Peer Group

The Committee uses a comparative peer group ~~for purposes of~~in determining competitive pay levels and compensation structure, setting incentive pay opportunities and assessing Company performance relative to its peers in support of AAM's executive compensation philosophy and objectives. The Committee ~~periodically~~annually reviews the composition of the comparative peer group ~~with guidance from the Committee's independent compensation consultant, Meridian,~~ and makes adjustments to reflect changes in the Company's business as well as industry and market conditions.

~~Following the results of the 2013 stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation, the Committee directed Meridian to evaluate the existing~~Our current comparative peer group ~~and recommend changes to to~~consists of the following companies:



A. O. Smith Corporation	Flowserve Corporation	Tower International Inc.
BorgWarner Inc. ^*	Kennametal Inc.	Trinity Industries, Inc.
Briggs & Stratton	Lear Corporation ^*	USG Corporation
Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc.	Meritor Inc. ^*	Valmont Industries, Inc.
Dana Holding Corporation ^*	Regal-Beloit Corporation	Visteon Corporation ^*
Donaldson Company, Inc.	Tenneco Automotive Inc. ^*	Woodward Inc.
Federal-Mogul Corporation	Terex Corporation

* Included in our competitor peer group as disclosed in our 2016 annual report to shareholders.
Our competitor peer group also includes Autoliv Inc. and Magna International Inc.

The Committee selected this peer group ~~that would more closely reflect AAM's business profile.~~based on guidance from the Committee's independent compensation consultant, Meridian ~~undertook a detailed study to develop a pool of potential peer companies from which to select the companies to be included in the~~Compensation Partners, LLC. Our comparative peer ~~group. In developing the pool, Meridian considered~~group includes companies in ~~the~~ automotive and related industries with ~~annual~~comparable (1) revenues ~~between~~(between one-third and three times our ~~revenues and those in our competitor peer group as described below. The initial pool was then narrowed by Meridian through the use of a weighted scorecard based on additional criteria, which included:~~

revenues), (2) complexity of global business and ~~operations;~~

operations and (3) market capitalization. This group also includes companies that compete with AAM for executive ~~talent;~~

~~market capitalization;~~talent and

companies included in the ~~peer groups established by~~ proxy advisory ~~firms for 2013.~~

~~Based on this analysis, Meridian recommended and the Committee approved a new comparative~~firms' peer ~~group of 20 companies, which resulted in the following changes:~~

~~the size of the peer group was reduced from 38 companies;~~

~~23 companies were removed and five were added to improve alignment with AAM based on the factors described above; and~~

six of our eight competitor peer group companies were included and two were excluded (namely, Autoliv, a foreign corporation, and Magna International, which has significantly greater revenues than AAM).

We believe the new comparative peer group has greater relevance to AAM in terms of industry, revenues, market capitalization, global complexity and competition. We expect that AAM's new and incremental backlog will drive AAM's sales to exceed the rate of growth expected in the industry.groups. AAM's projected ~~2014~~ revenues are ~~well positioned relative to~~at approximately the median of the comparative peer group's ~~2014~~ projected revenues.

The ~~following table shows~~Committee annually reviews the ~~companies in our new~~ comparative peer group ~~(used~~ to determine ~~2014 compensation),~~ the ~~prior~~appropriateness of the peer group considering the factors noted above. Based on an updated analysis of the peer group performed by Meridian during 2016, the Committee approved certain changes to the peer group to be used in the 2017 executive compensation benchmarking analysis. The changes to the peer group resulted in removing five of the current companies and adding six new companies. AAM's projected revenues remain at approximately the median of the revised comparative peer ~~group (used to determine 2013 compensation), and the companies in our competitor peer group as disclosed in our 2013 annual report to shareholders.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

group's projected revenues.

Company 2014 Peer Group 2013 Peer Group Competitor Peer Group
A. O. Smith Corporation X X
BorgWarner Inc. X X X
Briggs & Stratton X
Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. X
Dana Holding Corporation X X X
Donaldson Company, Inc. X X
Federal-Mogul Corporation X X
Flowserve Corporation X X
Kennametal Inc. X X
Lear Corporation X X X
Meritor Inc. X X X
Regal-Beloit Corporation X
Tenneco Automotive Inc. X X
Terex Corporation X X
Tower International Inc. X
Trinity Industries, Inc. X X
USG Corporation X X
Valmont Industries, Inc. X X
Visteon Corporation X X X
Woodward Inc. X
Ball Corporation X
Brady Corporation X
Cameron International Corporation X
Cummins Inc. X
Dover Corporation X
Eaton Corporation X
Federal Signal Corporation X
Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. X
FMC Technologies X
Genuine Parts Company X
Harley-Davidson Motor Company X
Ingersoll-Rand Company X
Joy Global Inc. X
Navistar International X
Owens-Illinois, Inc. X
PACCAR Inc. X
Polaris Industries Inc. X
Rockwell Automation X
Sauer-Danfoss Inc. X
Sonoco Products Company X
Thomas & Betts Corporation X
The Timken Company X
TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. X
Woodward Governor Company X
Autoliv Inc. X
Magna International Inc. X
Total Number of Companies 20 38 8

Compensation Benchmarking

~~The~~Generally, the Committee targets total direct compensation at approximately the 50^thpercentile of our comparative peer ~~group for total direct compensation~~group. The Committee believes that this approach reflects a generally accepted benchmark of ~~executives holding similar positions at companies in~~external competitiveness and supports our ~~comparative peer group.~~ ability to attract and retain key executives.

Total direct compensation consists of base salary plus target annual and long-term incentive compensation. Total direct compensation for each NEO may be above or below the 50^thpercentile of our comparative peer group ~~due to~~based on various factors, including an individual's level of responsibility, demonstrated skills and experience, significance of position, contribution to ~~the Company's~~Company performance, time in position, ~~and~~ potential for advancement ~~in the context of succession planning.~~and internal pay equity considerations. The Committee generally sets performance objectives for annual and long-term

~~Table of Contents~~

incentive compensation so that targeted total direct compensation levels can be achieved only when target performance objectives are met. Consequently, actual pay ~~earned by executives~~ may vary from targeted levels based on ~~the degree to which specific~~achieved performance ~~objectives are attained.~~

~~The Committee has moved away from setting annual and long-term incentive pay opportunities between the 50~~^th ~~and 75~~^th ~~percentile of our comparative peer group to targeting total direct compensation at approximately the 50~~^th ~~percentile. This target reflects a generally accepted benchmark of external competitiveness and supports our ability to attract and retain key executives.~~against pre-established performance objectives.

Tally Sheets

Annually, the Committee reviews compensation tally sheets for each executive officer, including the NEOs. The tally sheets, which are prepared by management, provide a summary of the current amounts of each component of pay and a history of prior long-term incentive grants. The tally sheets also show estimates of potential payments and benefits that could be realized under various hypothetical termination scenarios. The tally sheets consist of information that is substantially similar to the information shown for each NEO in Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control below. The Committee did not change the NEOs’ compensation based on its review of this information in ~~2013.~~2016.

Total NEO Total Direct Compensation Pay Mix

The following chart illustrates the allocation of 2016 total direct compensation components at target for our CEO and for our other NEOs as a group as of December 31, 2016. This analysis highlights the Company's emphasis on long-term and at-risk compensation.



CEO	Other NEOs (Average)

Total NEO Compensation

For 2016, the Committee set total direct compensation for Mr. Dauch and Mr. Simonte at approximately the 50^thpercentile of the peer group. For Mr. May, who was appointed CFO in August 2015, the Committee set total direct compensation below the 50th percentile based on his limited time in this position. The levels of total direct compensation for Mr. Satine and Mr. Willemse were determined in consideration of internal pay equity for their positions. Accordingly, total direct compensation was set below the 50^thpercentile of the peer group for Mr. Satine and above the 50^thpercentile for Mr. Willemse.

Components of the AAM Compensation Program

The primary components of AAM’s executive compensation program for 2016 are ~~base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives, and benefits and perquisites.~~summarized below:



Component	Key Characteristics	Purpose
Base Salary	* Part of competitive total compensation package * Determined based on market comparative positions and individual performance, experience, time in position, professional development, contributions to the Company and internal equity considerations	* Provides base level of cash compensation for attracting and retaining executive talent
Annual Incentive Compensation	* Determined based on pre-established financial performance factors, including: - Operating income margin (50%) and - Net operating cash flow (50%)	* Provides an opportunity to earn a cash-based annual incentive award * Aligns with financial performance * Target awards vary based on position and other factors
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Performance Shares (66%)	* Performance Shares tie a substantial portion of total compensation to the Company's future achievement of pre-established performance goals over a three-year performance period, including: - EBITDA (33%) - Relative TSR (33%)	* Aligns the interests of executive officers with those of shareholders by providing a mix of equity compensation tied to financial and share performance * Combined with the Company's vesting and stock ownership requirements, as well as a clawback feature, equity-based awards balance the goals of encouraging sustainable results over time and reward those results with appropriate levels of actual compensation * Total target awards vary based on position and other factors
Restricted Stock Units (34%)	* Restricted Stock Units align awards with stock price performance and encourage executive retention with vesting after a three-year period
Retirement Benefits and Deferred Compensation	* Includes qualified and nonqualified defined benefit and defined contribution plans, as well as a nonqualified retirement plan and deferred compensation plan	* Provides income upon retirement including tax-deferred methods for general savings
Perquisites	* Primarily consists of the use of a Company-provided vehicle with AAM content	* Provides a limited supplement to total direct compensation

Base Salary. In the fourth quarter of each year, the Committee reviews base salaries for executive officers for the following calendar year. In determining ~~2013~~2016 base salaries for executive officers, the Committee reviewed ~~benchmarking~~benchmark data comparing pay levels of our executive officers with ~~that~~those of executives holding similar positions at companies in our comparative peer group. The Committee also considered each individual’s experience, time in position, professional development, contribution to the Company, performance and other factors. For NEOs other than the Chairman, President & CEO, the Committee considered the recommendations of Mr. ~~D.C.~~ Dauch in determining other NEO base salaries. The Committee approved ~~2013~~2016 base ~~salary increases for the NEOs listed below~~salaries as follows:


	Base Salary				Base Salary
	2013		2012		2016		2015		% Change
David C. Dauch (effective September 1, 2013)	$	1,100,000	$	1,000,000
David C. Dauch					$	1,150,000	$	1,150,000	—	%
Christopher J. May (effective March 1, 2016)					$	400,000	$	350,000	14	%
Michael K. Simonte	$	543,800	$	527,900	$	640,000	$	640,000	—	%
John J. Bellanti	$	500,300	$	485,700
Alberto L. Satine	$	360,000	$	320,000	$	510,000	$	510,000	—	%
Norman Willemse	$	320,000	$	310,600	$	450,000	$	450,000	—	%

~~Effective September 1, 2013,~~In 2016, the Committee approved an increase to Mr. ~~D.C. Dauch’s~~May's base salary ~~was increased~~ to ~~$1,100,000. This increase reflects~~bring it closer the ~~additional leadership responsibilities he assumed~~50^thpercentile of the CFO positions among companies in ~~August 2013 upon the passing of Mr. R.E. Dauch. In making this determination, the Committee considered benchmarking data provided by Meridian regarding CEO compensation among~~ our comparative peer group. ~~The~~Mr. May was appointed CFO in August 2015 and therefore, the Committee ~~approved Mr. D.C. Dauch's~~set his initial base salary ~~increase effective September 1, 2013 with~~below the ~~expectation that this level would remain~~50th percentile subject to further review in ~~effect for fiscal 2014.~~

2016. The ~~increases in 2013~~Summary Compensation Table shows the base salary ~~shown above~~earned in 2016 for ~~Mr. Simonte, Mr. Bellanti (in lump sum) and Mr. Willemse represent annual merit increases of 3%, which is consistent with the budgeted amount for the merit program for U.S. salaried associates.~~each NEO.

The increase in Mr. Satine's 2013 base salary was 12.5%. Based on the recommendation of the Chairman, President & CEO, the Committee considered Mr. Satine's significant role in strategic matters, the depth of his manufacturing and engineering experience in light of AAM's expanding global operations and his demonstrated leadership capabilities. This salary adjustment was made in the context of AAM's succession planning for a key leadership position previously held by Mr. Bellanti, who retired as head of worldwide operations on January 1, 2014. Mr. Satine assumed leadership responsibility for a significant portion of AAM's global operations upon Mr. Bellanti's retirement.

~~Table of Contents~~

Annual Incentive ~~Compensation.~~Compensation ~~Annual incentive compensation at AAM is designed to:~~.

~~encourage executives to achieve short-term objectives to foster achievement of the Company's long-term goals;~~

~~reward performance to support strategic initiatives; and~~

~~provide incentive for executive retention.~~

~~Annual~~Each NEO's annual incentive compensation is ~~measured~~based on achieved results against pre-established financial targets approved by ~~our achievement of financial targets~~the Committee and established under AAM’s Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers. ~~All executive officers participated in this plan during 2013.~~

On an annual basis, the Committee determines one or more performance factors, and the relative weighting of each factor, in consideration of the Company’s key performance objectives. Under the plan, the performance factors that may be selected are: (1) net income as a percentage of sales (NIPS); (2) after tax return on invested capital (ROIC); and (3) net operating cash flow. Net operating cash flow is defined as cash provided by or used in operating activities less capital expenditures net of proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment. ROIC is defined as after-tax return divided by average invested capital. Target performance levels, established annually, are intended to be aggressive but achievable based on industry conditions.

Payment of annual cash incentive awards ~~are~~is permitted to the extent the Company ~~(1)~~ meets or exceeds threshold performance levels ~~of performance set by the Committee~~ and ~~(2)~~ reports positive net ~~income for~~income. Subject to 162(m) of the ~~performance year.~~

~~The annual incentive plan permits~~Internal Revenue Code, the Committee tomay make discretionary adjustments if it determines that the achievement of performance targets for a plan year do not reflect the true performance of the Company due to unanticipated circumstances specified in the plan. ~~Although the plan permits the Committee to exercise discretion in adjusting individual award payouts, the Committee made no discretionary increases to 2013 payouts for any of our NEOs.~~

The table below shows the ~~2013~~2016 target annual incentive opportunities for ~~the following~~our NEOs, stated as a percentage of base salary:



	~~Target Annual Incentive~~ ~~Opportunity~~
~~David C. Dauch~~	~~125%~~
~~Michael K. Simonte~~	~~80%~~
~~John J. Bellanti~~	~~80%~~
~~Alberto L. Satine~~	~~60%~~
~~Norman Willemse~~	~~60%~~



	Target Annual Incentive Opportunity
	2016	2015
David C. Dauch	125%	125%
Christopher J. May	60%	54%
Michael K. Simonte	100%	88%
Alberto L. Satine	80%	68%
Norman Willemse	80%	68%

The ~~2013~~ annual incentive target opportunities for ~~each NEO remains unchanged from 2012.~~Mr. May, Mr. Simonte, Mr. Satine and Mr. Willemse were increased effective August 1, 2015 in connection with promotions to their new leadership positions.

~~2013~~Amendment and Restatement of Annual Incentive ~~Performance~~Plan

In February 2016, the Committee approved the use of operating income margin as an additional performance measure for annual incentives awarded under the Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers. The Committee selected this additional performance measure to more closely align compensation with our business strategy of exceptional operating performance. By removing the impact of financing and tax activities, this metric more effectively aligns incentive opportunities with operational performance objectives. This pre-tax earnings measure is more prevalent among companies in our comparative peer group. The plan will continue to include net income as a percentage of sales, net operating cash flow and return on invested capital as available performance measures.

In support of the Company’s ~~2013~~2016 goals and objectives, the Committee approved the use of net operating cash flow and ~~NIPS,~~operating income margin, each with equal weighting, as the performance metrics for determining ~~2013~~2016 annual cash incentives. These performance metrics were selected for the following reasons:

~~Net~~net operating cash flow is ~~a critical~~an important financial metric for AAM due to its impact on liquidity, debt reduction and stockholder value creation;

~~Increasing~~increasing net operating cash flow is also key to achieving credit rating upgrades, which ~~will have~~has a favorable impact on the Company’s cost of future financing; and

~~Net~~operating income is a key indicator of financial and operational ~~performance; and~~performance.

Net ~~income and net income growth are highly correlated to~~operating cash flow is defined as net cash ~~flow growth~~provided by or used in operating activities less capital expenditures net of proceeds from the sale of property, plant and ~~stockholder value creation.~~equipment and from government grants.

2016 Annual Incentive Performance

In the fourth quarter of ~~2012,~~2015, in conjunction with a review of the Board-approved annual budget, the Committee set ~~2013~~2016 performance targets for the net operating cash flow and ~~NIPS~~operating income margin performance metrics as follows:

~~Table of Contents~~

Net Operating
Cash Flow

Net Income as a
Percentage of Sales
Performance Payout Performance Payout
Threshold $25 million 50% 1% 30%
Target $75 million 100% 3% 100%
Maximum $100 million 125% >3% >100%



	Weighting	Threshold (Payout 50%)	Target (Payout 100%)	Maximum (Payout 200%)	2016 Actual Performance
Net Operating Cash Flow	50%	$82.5 million	$110.0 million	$126.5 million	$198.6 million⁽¹⁾

Operating Income Margin	50%	6.72%	8.96%	10.30%	10.31%⁽²⁾

~~Budgeted net~~(1) Excludes the impact of cash paid for restructuring and acquisition-related costs of $9.5 million.

(2) Excludes the impact of restructuring, acquisition-related and asset impairment costs of $26.2 million.

The target for each performance metric was set at budget. The threshold performance was set at 75% of target and the maximum performance was set at 115% of target. In determining these performance and payout levels, the Committee considered an annual incentive plan market analysis performed by Meridian that compared the Company's performance and payout levels to those used by companies in our comparative peer group and among a broader industry group.

The Committee considered the effectiveness of the annual incentive plan design to drive desired levels of performance. The Committee concluded that the threshold performance levels 10.31hould be set at a percentage of target that would drive a higher minimum level of performance, resulting in the achievement of a greater payout of 50% (previously 25%). In addition, the Committee set the maximum levels to reward exceptional performance deserving of a 200% payout. The 2016 annual incentive performance and payout levels are consistent with market practices based on Meridian's analysis.

The operating ~~cash flow~~income margin performance levels were also compared to that of our competitor peer group for ~~2013 was $50 million.~~the three most recent fiscal years. The target performance level for net operating cash flow was based on the Company outperforming the budget by $25 million; the maximum performance level was based on outperforming the budget by $50 million. The 2013 annual budget also included $30 million in proceeds from anticipated sale-leaseback transactions.

~~The target and threshold performance levels for NIPS were determined based on our performance relative to our competitor peer group. The target performance level for NIPS, or 3%,~~ was set at a level to meet the performance of the top ~~one-half~~one-third of our competitor peer group for the three most recent fiscal years. Although there was no stated maximum award opportunity based on NIPS for 2013, the Committee established a maximum payout for such awards beginning in 2014.

The Company’s 2013 adjusted net operating cash flow was $32.4 million. For 2013, net operating cash flow included the proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions and excluded the impact of debt refinancing costs and other special charges totaling $28.1 million. Accordingly, a payout of 57% was made for 2013 based on the net operating cash flow metric.

~~The Company’s 2013 NIPS was 3.79%, excluding the impact of debt refinancing costs and other special charges. Accordingly, the NIPS performance metric resulted in an achievement of 117% of target.~~group.

Based on the weighting of each performance metric, the ~~2013~~2016 annual incentive awards resulted in a payout of ~~87%~~200% of target. No discretionary increases were made to ~~2013~~2016 annual incentive payouts for any NEO. The annual incentive awards paid are shown in the Summary Compensation Table.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. ~~Long-term incentive compensation at AAM is designed to:~~

~~align executive officer and stockholder interests;~~

~~reward achievement of long-term performance goals; and~~

~~provide incentives for executive retention.~~

The table below shows the ~~2013~~2016 target long-term incentive opportunities for our NEOs:



	2016 Target Long-Term Incentive Opportunity
	($)⁽¹⁾	%⁽²⁾
David C. Dauch	4,600,000	400%
Christopher J. May	400,000	100%
Michael K. Simonte	1,472,000	230%
Alberto L. Satine	765,000	150%
Norman Willemse	675,000	150%

(1) Amounts reflect the ~~following NEOs, stated~~value the Committee considered when granting the awards for 2016. These amounts differ from the value of the awards shown in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table because those tables reflect the probable outcome of the performance metrics for the performance shares.

(2) Stated as a percentage of base ~~salary:~~

salary.

Target Long-Term Incentive Opportunity
2013 2012
David C. Dauch 350% 240%
Michael K. Simonte 200% 120%
John J. Bellanti 200% 120%
Alberto L. Satine 120% 80%
Norman Willemse 100% 80%

Mr. Dauch's LTI opportunity was increased to 400% from 375% of base salary effective January 1, 2016. The Committee approved this increase in consideration of the Company's financial performance and Mr. Dauch's leadership in strengthening AAM's management team and advancing product technology and innovation. In addition, Mr. Dauch's LTI opportunity has been increased to 450% for 2017. In determining ~~2013 long-term incentive~~ Mr. Dauch's 2017 LTI

target ~~opportunities,~~and in consultation with Meridian, the Committee considered, ~~Meridian’s~~among other factors, market ~~analysis, which indicated that long-term incentive~~data provided by Meridian, the strong leadership exhibited by Mr. Dauch in positioning AAM to achieve its strategic objectives, and the outstanding operational and financial performance of the Company in 2016.

The target LTI opportunities for ~~our NEOs at 2012 levels~~Mr. May (from 60%), Mr. Simonte (from 200%), Mr. Satine (from 120%) and Mr. Willemse (from 100%) were ~~below the 50~~^th~~percentile~~increased for ~~comparable positions at companies~~2016 awards in ~~our comparative peer group. As a result, the Committee approved 2013 long-term incentive targets shown above~~connection with ~~the objective of targeting total compensation at approximately the 50~~^th ~~percentile.~~their appointments to new positions.

~~2013~~2016 Long-Term Incentives

~~In March 2013, the Company granted the NEOs equity-based and cash-based long-term incentives under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan.~~ The Committee determined the ~~form~~LTI program and ~~mix of awards~~each NEO's target LTI opportunity for 2016 in consideration of ~~AAM’s compensation objectives, current~~peer group data, market ~~practice~~trends, pay-for-performance alignment and ~~share usage.~~

~~Table~~executive retention. Under the 2016 LTI program, each NEO was granted performance shares of ~~Contents~~

~~One-half~~66% and RSUs of 34% of the ~~total 2013 long-term incentive award value for NEOs was~~NEO's target LTI value. RSU awards vest in full on the ~~form~~third anniversary of ~~cash-based performance units (PUs) with a notional value of one dollar~~the grant date and ~~one-half was in the form of restricted stock units (RSUs). The RSUs~~ are payable in ~~common~~shares. These awards were granted under the Amended and Restated 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan).

Performance share awards are subject to two equally weighted three-year performance metrics: (1) cumulative earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) margin and (2) relative total shareholder return (TSR). The Committee selected EBITDA margin because it is a key indicator of our financial and operational performance and is useful in analyzing entity valuation. The Committee selected relative TSR because of its alignment with stock ~~contingent upon continued employment through the three-year vesting period. The RSUs were~~price performance. This TSR performance metric is designed ~~to provide opportunities for share ownership and~~ to motivate executive officers to build long-term value for our stockholders.

The ~~target award payment for PUs will be determined based on~~EBITDA and relative TSR performance measures also complement the ~~Company’s cumulative earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) margin performance from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015. These awards were designed~~metrics we use to align executive officer performance goals with those of the Company. The Committee selected EBITDA as the performance measure based on its belief that EBITDA is a key indicator of the Company’s financial and operational performance and is useful in analyzing entity valuation.

~~The terms of the RSUs and PUs are described in more detail in the~~ ~~Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table~~ ~~below.~~determine payouts under our annual incentive program.

The following table shows the threshold, target and maximum EBITDA margin and relative TSR performance levels to be used in determining ~~2013 award~~the payouts for ~~PUs.~~these awards for the performance period January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018. These ~~EBITDA~~ performance levels were designed to drive a level of performance in the top one-half of our competitor peer group. The competitor peer group consists of companies listed ~~in the table shown~~ above in Peer Group and Compensation Benchmarking.


			EBITDA Margin Performance Measure		Relative TSR Performance Measure
Performance Level	3 Year Cumulative EBITDA Margin	Percent of Target Award Opportunity Earned	3 Year Cumulative EBITDA Margin	Percent of Target Award Opportunity Earned	Company's TSR Percentile Rank	Percent of Target Award Opportunity Earned
Threshold	10%	25%	10%	25%	35^th	50%
Target	12%	100%	12%	100%	50^th	100%
Maximum	15%	200%	15%	200%	75^th	200%

Payout of 2014 ~~Long-Term Incentives~~Performance Share Awards

~~Following the results of our 2013 stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation and feedback received during our stockholder outreach, the Committee redesigned our LTI program~~The performance period for 2014 to strengthen the pay-for-performance alignment of long-term incentive compensation for executive officers. In determining the new program design, the Committee received guidance from Meridian regarding design alternatives and market trends. Meridian evaluated the 2013 LTI program described above, considering our LTI program objectives, pay-for-performance alignment and mix of award vehicles. In consideration of Meridian's recommendations, the Committee approved LTI program design changes for 2014.

~~A key design change was the introduction of~~ performance shares ~~as a new equity-based award vehicle. Under our~~granted in 2014 ~~LTI program, performance share awards account for 66%~~ended on December 31, 2016. The final number of the total LTI award opportunity for executive officers. This proportion of performance-based equity awards exceeds the current market practice of approximately 50% of total LTI compensation being performance-based. Payoutsshares earned under these awards will be measured by cumulative EBITDA margin and relative total shareholder return (TSR) performance over a three-year performance period and paid only to the extent that pre-established performance targets are achieved. The Committee determined that the remaining 34% of long-term incentive equity awards should be in the form of RSUs settled in common stock with three-year cliff vesting. The Committee believes these RSUs promote retention of key executives.

Our new LTI program design, which is 100% equity-based, further aligns the interests of executive officers with those of our stockholders by tying a substantial portion of each executive officer's long-term incentive award to Company performance and by promoting increased stock ownership.

~~Prior Long-Term Incentive Awards under the AAM 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan~~

Prior to adoption of the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company’s LTI program consisted of cash-based performance awards made under the AAM 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2009 AAM LTIP). Payouts of the 2011 cash-based performance awards were determinedwas based on ~~cumulative~~ EBITDA margin and relative TSR ~~for~~over the three-year performance period ~~beginning January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013. The Company’s cumulative EBITDA percentage for~~as follows:



	Actual Performance	%of Target Shares Earned	Award Weighting	Weighted Payout
EBITDA Margin	14.7%⁽¹⁾	191%	50%	96%

Relative TSR	22^nd percentile	—%	50%	—%
		Final Payout as a % of Target		96%

(1) Excludes the ~~performance period was 13.2%, after adjustments approved by the Committee for~~impact of a settlement charge related to certain ~~special charges, including costs associated with plant closures~~terminated vested participants under our defined benefit U.S. pension plans and ~~debt refinancing. The adjusted EBITDA percentage resulted in a payment at 140% of target. The Company’s relative TSR for the performance period ranked above the 75~~^th ~~percentile of our competitor peer group~~restructuring and ~~resulted in a payout of 200% of target.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Based on the 50% weighting of EBITDA and relative TSR performance, total award payments were 170% of target for each NEO.~~acquisition-related costs. See ~~Summary Compensation Table~~Reconciliation of Non-GAAP and GAAP information ~~for the amounts paid in March 2014.~~.

Equity Grant Practices

AAM generally makes equity grants to its executive officers and other executives on an annual basis, subject to the approval of the Committee. Grants are typically made in the first quarter of each year to coincide with the communication to executive officers of their annual cash incentive awards for the previous year’s performance.

This timing increases the impact of the awards by strengthening the link between pay and performance. AAM ~~does not and~~ has never ~~permitted~~allowed backdating, spring loading or other timing of option grants with the release of material non-public information. Currently, stock options are not used as a vehicle for long-term incentive awards under our compensation programs.

Benefits. Our NEOs participate in the same benefit and retirement plans in which our U.S. salaried associates participate. A group of approximately 5060 senior executives, including the NEOs, also receive supplemental life, supplemental disability and umbrella liability insurance benefits. Our NEOs are eligible to participate in AAM’s qualified and nonqualified defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans. They are also eligible to participate in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that permits deferrals of a portion of base salary and/or annual cash incentive compensation on a pretax basis. These plans are described in the Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation sections below.

Perquisites. AAM provides a limited number of perquisites to senior executives, including our NEOs. AAM ~~has never owned a corporate aircraft and generally does not provide leased aircraft for personal use. AAM~~ does not pay for country club memberships. Senior executives are eligible for the use of a Company-provided vehicle with AAM content. ~~The President & CEO is entitled to~~Mr. Dauch has the use of two Company-provided vehicles. ~~From time to time,~~Occasionally, the Company invites spouses of AAM ~~senior~~ executives to attend Company business ~~events. For attendance that requires a spouse to travel, the Company~~events and pays for the spouse’s travel and ~~other~~ related non-business ~~expenses and~~expenses. The Company reimburses the executive for taxes attributable to the income associated with this benefit. We do not otherwise provide tax gross ups for executives except for those available for all salaried associates generally. Perquisites are further described in the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table.

~~Total NEO Compensation.~~ In determining NEO pay levels, the Committee reviews each element of compensation -- base salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation -- with the objective of targeting total compensation at approximately the 50^th ~~percentile of executives holding similar positions at companies in our comparative peer group.~~Employment Agreements

~~Based on Meridian's market data analysis, 2013 total compensation for Mr. D.C. Dauch, Mr. Bellanti and Mr. Willemse was at approximately the 50~~^th~~percentile of pay among executives holding similar positions at companies in our comparative peer group. Total 2013 compensation for Mr. Simonte and Mr. Satine was between the 50~~^th~~and 75~~^thpercentile among executives holding similar positions at companies in our comparative peer group. For purposes of this comparison, the scope of responsibilities of both Mr. Simonte and Mr. Satine is broader than those holding similar positions at the companies in the comparative peer group. As a result, the pay levels for Mr. Simonte and Mr. Satine were set above the 50^thpercentile to reflect the additional leadership responsibilities they have as compared to the benchmarked positions. Mr. Simonte has significant leadership responsibilities over key functional areas beyond his role as CFO and leader of AAM's global finance organization. These functional areas include information technology, legal, and marketing and communications. Mr. Satine's position was benchmarked against the lead sales position among our comparative peer group; however, Mr. Satine has broader responsibilities associated with his leadership of AAM's global strategic business development.

~~Compensation of former Executive Chairman~~

~~The compensation of AAM's Co-Founder and former Executive Chairman of the Board is set forth in his employment agreement dated August 27, 2012.~~ The terms of ~~his~~Mr. Dauch's and Mr. Simonte's employment ~~agreement, which terminated upon his death on August 2, 2013,~~agreements are described in the~~Narrative to Summary Compensation and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table~~ ~~below.~~

Mr. R.E. Dauch's total compensation reflected his extensive knowledge and expertise in the global automotive industry and the Board’s expectations regarding his contribution to the achievement of AAM’s goals and business strategy objectives. The components of his compensation are described below.

~~Base Salary.~~ ~~Mr. R.E. Dauch’s annual base salary for 2013 was set at $2 million. The amounts paid through August 2, 2013 and in 2012 and 2011 are shown in the~~ ~~Summary Compensation Table~~.

~~Annual Incentive.~~ ~~For calendar year 2013, Mr. R.E. Dauch was eligible for a target annual incentive opportunity of two times his annual base salary. His 2013 annual incentive was determined under AAM's Incentive~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Compensation Plan for Executive Officers. Accordingly, his 2013 annual incentive was based on the achievement of the pre-established performance metrics described above in~~ ~~2013 Annual Incentive Performance~~. Based on the weighting of each performance metric, he was eligible to receive a 2013 annual incentive of 87% of his target opportunity. The annual incentive paid to Mr. R.E. Dauch's beneficiary was pro-rated based on time served through August 2, 2013. The Committee exercised no discretion in determining his 2013 annual incentive award payout. See ~~Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table~~ ~~below.~~

~~Long-Term Incentives.~~ Mr. R.E. Dauch was not entitled to a long-term incentive award in 2013. Vesting of his outstanding long-term incentive awards was accelerated upon his death pursuant to the applicable award agreements. The grant date fair value of these awards was reported in the summary compensation table for 2012. See Narrative to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Tableand ~~and~~ ~~Options Exercised and Stock Vested~~ ~~table below.~~Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.

Change in Control Plan

~~Benefits~~The AAM Executive Officer Change in Control (CIC) Plan provides eligible executive officers severance payments and ~~Perquisites.~~ ~~Mr. R.E. Dauch participated~~benefits in the ~~same benefit programs~~event of termination of employment on or within two years following a CIC. Mr. Dauch and Mr. Simonte do not participate in ~~which other~~the CIC Plan due to the severance payments and benefits provided under each of their employment agreements. The Board believes the CIC Plan enhances stockholder value by encouraging executive officers ~~participate. Under his employment agreement, AAM~~to consider CIC transactions that may be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders while keeping them neutral to potential job loss. The Board also believes that the CIC Plan is aligned with competitive market practices and will help to retain key talent. Severance benefits provided ~~him~~to our NEOs are described under Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.

Executive Compensation Recoupment (Clawback) Policy

The clawback policy authorizes the Committee to determine whether to require recoupment of performance-based incentive compensation actually paid or awarded to any executive officer if certain conditions are met. For purposes of this policy, performance-based compensation includes all annual incentives for periods beginning with the ~~use of two Company vehicles~~2014 fiscal year and ~~reimbursed him for premiums~~long-term incentives awarded after January 1, 2014, whether paid in cash or equity, to the extent the awards are determined based on the Company's financial performance.

The Committee may require recoupment if the executive officer engaged in fraud or intentional misconduct that caused or contributed to the need for a ~~$5 million life insurance policy. Perquisites provided in 2013, 2012~~material restatement of the Company's financial statements filed with the SEC. If the Committee determines that any performance-based compensation paid or awarded to the executive officer would not have been awarded or would have been awarded at a lower amount had it been calculated based on such restated financial statements (adjusted compensation), the Committee may seek to recover for the benefit of the Company the excess of the awarded compensation over the adjusted compensation (excess compensation). In deciding whether to seek recovery of excess compensation from the executive officer, the Committee will consider the factors it deems relevant under the circumstances and ~~2011 are reported~~whether the assertion of a claim is in the ~~Summary Compensation Table.~~best interests of the Company.

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Requirements

A fundamental objective of our compensation program is for executive officers to own AAM stock in order to align their interests with those of our stockholders and to reinforce the importance of making sound long-term decisions. ~~In April 2012, based on an analysis provided by Meridian and in order to align the~~The Company's current stock ownership requirements ~~with prevalent market practices, the Committee revised the Company's stock ownership requirements,~~are as follows:



	Multiple of Base Salary
Chief Executive Officer	56
~~Executive Vice~~Chief Financial Officer; President	3
Senior ~~Vice President, Group Vice President and~~ Vice President	2

Executive officers have five years ~~from April 2012~~ to meet these requirements or, for new executive officers, five years from the date of appointment. Shares owned directly, ~~and any~~ unvested RSUs ~~(settled in stock)~~and performance shares (at target) count toward the requirement while unexercised stock options are not included. These ownership levels must be maintained as long as the person is an executive officer of AAM.

NEOs who have not met these requirements may not sell shares. The Committee annually reviews each executive officer’s stock ownership level according to this policy. Each ~~of our current NEOs~~NEO has met or is on track to meet the ownership requirements established for his position.

Anti-hedging and Anti-pledging Policy

~~All~~AAM prohibits employees and non-employee directors ~~are prohibited~~ from entering into transactions that may result in a financial benefit if our stock price declines, or any hedging transaction involving our stock, including but not limited to the use of financial derivatives, short sales or any similar transactions. Pledging of Company stock is also prohibited.

~~Severance Benefits and Restrictive Covenants~~

On September 27, 2013, Mr. D.C. Dauch's employment agreement was amended and restated to provide for certain severance benefits if his employment is terminated as a result of a change in control of the Company (CIC). His employment agreement also provides for an automatic two-year extension following a CIC. Benefits payable to Mr. D.C. Dauch upon termination of employment without cause or upon resignation for good reason remain unchanged from his prior employment agreement. Severance benefits provided under his employment agreement are described under ~~Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control~~ ~~below.~~

The Board believes the CIC arrangement with Mr. D.C. Dauch is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. The CIC arrangement will enhance stockholder value by encouraging him to consider CIC transactions that may be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders, even if the transaction may ultimately result in termination of his employment.

AAM does not provide any other NEO with severance benefits upon termination of employment for any reason, including as a result of a ClC. However, early vesting of certain long-term incentive awards is allowed upon a

~~Table of Contents~~

CIC. The Committee believes this feature reflects competitive market practices, encourages retention of key executives and reduces their concerns that payment of these awards will be jeopardized by a CIC.

~~Each of the NEOs has agreed to non-competition and non-solicitation covenants for a period following termination of employment. For additional information, see~~ ~~Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control~~ ~~below.~~

~~Executive Compensation Recoupment (Clawback) Policy~~

During our outreach efforts following the 2013 vote, stockholders expressed a concern that we had not adopted a clawback policy. Based on this feedback, the Committee adopted an executive compensation recoupment (clawback) policy. This policy authorizes the Committee to determine whether to require recoupment of performance-based incentive compensation actually paid or awarded to any executive officer if certain conditions are met. For purposes of this policy, performance-based compensation includes all annual incentives for periods beginning with the 2014 fiscal year and long-term incentives awarded after January 1, 2014, whether paid in cash or equity, to the extent the awards are determined based on the Company's financial performance.

The Committee may require recoupment if the executive officer engaged in fraud or intentional misconduct that caused or contributed to the need for a material restatement of the Company's financial statements filed with the SEC. If the Committee determines that any performance-based compensation paid or awarded to the executive officer would not have been awarded or would have been awarded at a lower amount had it been calculated based on such restated financial statements (adjusted compensation), the Committee may seek to recover for the benefit of the Company the excess of the awarded compensation over the adjusted compensation (excess compensation). In deciding whether to seek recovery of excess compensation from the executive officer, the Committee will consider the factors it deems relevant under the circumstances and whether the assertion of a claim is in the best interests of the Company.

~~Tax Gross Ups~~

~~The Company does not provide tax gross ups to an executive officer upon a change in control.~~

Tax Deductibility of Compensation

In general, the compensation awarded to NEOs will be taxable to the executive and will give rise to a corresponding corporate deduction at the time the compensation is paid. Section 162(m) of the ~~Internal Revenue~~ Code precludes a public corporation from taking a tax deduction for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the CEO or to other NEOs other than the CFO. One exception applies to performance-based compensation paid pursuant to stockholder-approved employee benefit plans. Performance-based compensation is compensation that is paid only if the individual’s performance meets pre-established objective performance goals based on performance criteria approved by our stockholders.

Although deductibility of compensation is preferred, tax deductibility is not the primary objective of our compensation programs. The Committee may decide to pay compensation or grant awards that serve the objectives of our executive compensation program even though such compensation or awards may not be deductible by the Company.

The annual incentives and long-term incentive performance ~~unit~~share awards granted in ~~2013~~2016 to our NEOs are intended to comply with the performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m). RSUs granted to NEOs in ~~2013,~~2016, although not deductible, were considered to be the appropriate vehicle for a portion of the long-term incentive component of our executive compensation program.

~~REPORT OF THE~~ 2017 Changes to Executive Compensation Program

In 2017, we made the following changes to our executive compensation program:

The Board proposed an amendment to the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan that included the following:


◦	Minimum one-year vesting of awards;


◦	Non-employee director pay limits;


◦	Prohibition of share recycling on stock options; and


◦	Prohibition of the payout of dividend equivalents before awards are vested.

In anticipation of the proposed acquisition of MPG, the Committee approved a new custom peer group for benchmarking executive compensation that took into consideration the expected increase in projected AAM revenues. In February 2017, based on Meridian's benchmark analysis, the Committee approved adjustments to the components of NEO and non-employee director compensation which will not be implemented until the successful closing of the acquisition of MPG.

Increased stock ownership requirements for the CEO and certain other NEOs and increased stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP and GAAP Information

AAM has included in this Amendment adjusted operating income margin, adjusted net operating cash flow and adjusted EBITDA, which are financial metrics used in our Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers and the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. These metrics are non-GAAP financial measures. Such information is reconciled to its closest GAAP measure in the tables below in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules.

Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to both management and its stockholders in their analysis of the Company's business and operating performance. Management also uses this information for operational planning and decision-making purposes. Non-GAAP financial measures are not and should not be considered a substitute for any GAAP measure. Additionally, non-GAAP financial measures as presented by AAM may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.



2016 Annual Incentive Performance Metrics
	Twelve Months Ended
	December 31,
	2016
Adjusted Operating Income Margin:	(in millions)
Operating income, as reported	$	380.7
Restructuring and acquisition-related costs	26.2
Adjusted operating income	$	406.9

Net sales, as reported	$	3,948.0

Adjusted operating income margin	10.31		%


Net Operating Cash Flow:
Cash provided by operations, as reported	$	407.6
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(223.0		)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment	1.7
Proceeds from government grants	2.8
Cash paid for restructuring and acquisition-related costs	9.5
Net operating cash flow	$	198.6



2014 Long-term Incentive Performance Metric

	Twelve Months Ended
	December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Earnings before interest expense, income taxes and depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and Adjusted EBITDA:	(in millions)
Net income	$	240.7		$	235.6		$	143.0
Interest expense	93.4			99.2			99.9
Income tax expense	58.3			37.1			33.7
Depreciation and amortization	201.8			198.4			199.9
EBITDA	$	594.2		$	570.3		$	476.5
Restructuring and acquisition-related costs	26.2			—			—
Debt refinancing and redemption costs	—			0.8			—
Non-recurring items⁽¹⁾	(1.0		)	—			35.5
Adjusted EBITDA	$	619.4		$	571.1		$	512.0

Net sales, as reported	$	3,948.0		$	3,903.1		$	3,696.0

Adjusted EBITDA margin	15.7		%	14.6		%	13.9		%

3-year cumulative EBITDA margin	14.7		%

(1) Includes for 2016 the impact of an investment gain related to the final distribution of the Reserve Yield Plus Fund. Also includes for 2014 the impact of a settlement charge related to certain terminated vested participants under our defined benefit U.S. pension plans.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on such review and discussion, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

~~Forest J. Farmer, Chairman~~

Elizabeth A. Chappell, Chair

~~Steven B. Hantler~~William L. Kozyra

~~Larry K. Switzer~~James A. McCaslin

~~Thomas K. Walker~~Samuel Valenti III

~~Table of Contents~~

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table summarizes the compensation of our named executive officers (NEOs) for the fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2013,~~2016, December 31, ~~2012~~2015 and December 31, ~~2011.~~2014 to the extent they served as our NEOs in such years.

Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards⁽¹⁾
($)
Options
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-
sation⁽²⁾
($)
Change in
Pension Value
And
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings⁽³⁾
($)
All Other
Compen-
sation⁽⁴⁾
($)
Total
($)
David C. Dauch⁽⁵⁾
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
2013 1,033,333
—
1,750,002
—
3,185,250
245,423
116,389
6,330,397
2012 873,333
21,500
979,013
—
1,728,100
565,534
67,695
4,235,175
2011 650,004
111,150
—
—
7,169,180
397,228
28,778
8,356,340
Michael K. Simonte
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
2013 543,800
—
543,810

1,429,085
27,943
50,817
2,595,455
2012 527,900
4,617
316,743
—
935,383
294,245
48,942
2,127,830
2011 515,004
37,080
—
—
4,255,095
251,101
49,604
5,107,884
John J. Bellanti⁽⁶⁾
Executive Vice President, Worldwide Operations
2013 500,300
—
485,713
—
1,678,896
—
45,240
2,710,149
2012 485,700
—
291,424
—
802,400
188,187
42,429
1,810,140
2011 473,796
—
—
—
2,166,972
446,401
33,823
3,120,992
Alberto L. Satine⁽⁶⁾
Group Vice President
Global Sales & Business Development
2013 360,000
—
216,006
—
565,800
—
41,399
1,183,205
Norman Willemse
Vice President, Metal Formed Product Business Unit
2013 320,000
—
160,006
—
579,120
12,546
50,348
1,122,020
2012 310,600
—
124,249
—
376,808
100,562
48,162
960,381
2011 303,000
—
—
—
603,180
113,444
41,412
1,061,036
Richard E. Dauch⁽⁵⁾
Co-Founder & Former Executive Chairman
(deceased August 2, 2013)
2013 1,181,818
—
—
—
2,030,000
—
155,822
3,367,640
2012 2,000,000
4,000,000
6,874,007
627,000
—
4,201,202
141,916
17,844,125
2011 2,526,728
6,000,000
—
—
—
2,802,700
149,441
11,478,869



Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards⁽²⁾ ($)	Options Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen- sation⁽³⁾ ($)	Change in Pension Value And Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings⁽⁴⁾ ($)	All Other Compen- sation⁽⁵⁾ ($)	Total ($)
David C. Dauch⁽¹⁾Chairman & Chief Executive Officer	2016	1,150,000	—	5,617,069	—	2,875,000	1,385,652	74,599	11,102,320
	2015	1,150,000	—	5,348,595	—	5,447,875	1,201,615	67,131	13,215,216
	2014	1,100,000	—	4,454,330	—	2,638,120	1,081,679	75,189	9,349,318
Christopher J. May Vice President & Chief Financial Officer	2016	391,667	—	488,450	—	480,000	231,058	47,641	1,638,816
	2015	292,505	—	148,344	—	297,646	107,445	44,199	890,139

Michael K. Simonte President	2016	640,000	—	1,797,486	—	1,280,000	397,940	50,836	4,166,262
	2015	603,192	—	1,431,050	—	1,773,967	347,876	52,561	4,208,646
	2014	560,100	—	1,296,049	—	961,046	375,597	52,666	3,245,458
Alberto L. Satine President Driveline	2016	510,000	—	934,146	—	814,500	280,651	58,130	2,597,427
	2015	482,875	—	689,895	—	899,225	224,587	52,473	2,349,055
	2014	450,000	—	624,777	—	498,640	237,798	41,032	1,852,247
Norman Willemse President Metal Formed Products	2016	450,000	—	824,283	—	720,000	236,980	33,925	2,265,188
	2015	426,667	—	508,544	—	743,575	169,498	32,065	1,880,349
	2014	375,767	—	445,473	—	445,467	135,322	48,459	1,450,488


(1)	Compensation of Mr. Dauch is based solely on employment as an executive officer. He received no compensation for serving as a director.

(2)

Reflects the ~~full~~ grant date fair value of ~~equity~~restricted stock units and performance share awards made during fiscal year ~~2013~~2016 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718 (without any reduction for risk of forfeiture) as determined based on applying the assumptions used in our financial statements. ~~The grant date fair value of stock awards is calculated using the closing market price of AAM common stock on the date of grant.~~ See Note 7 to the audited consolidated financial statements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2016 regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards. Assuming the maximum performance levels are achieved for the performance share awards granted on March 4, 2016, the maximum value of performance share awards would be $6,072,014 for Mr. Dauch, $528,015 for Mr. May, $1,943,069 for Mr. Simonte, $1,009,801 for Mr. Satine and $891,052 for Mr. Willemse based on grant date fair value. These amounts may not reflect the actual value realized upon vesting or settlement, if any.


~~(2)~~(3)	Reflects amounts earned under the AAM Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers ~~and the 2009 AAM LTIP with respect to the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2013. The 2013 amounts are as follows:~~for 2016.

AAM Incentive
Compensation Plan
AAM LTIP Total
David C. Dauch $ 1,196,250
$ 1,989,000
$ 3,185,250
Michael K. Simonte $ 378,485
$ 1,050,600
$ 1,429,085
John J. Bellanti^(a)
$ 285,000
$ 1,393,896
$ 1,678,896
Alberto L. Satine $ 185,000
$ 380,800
$ 565,800
Norman Willemse $ 167,040
$ 412,080
$ 579,120
Richard E. Dauch $ 2,030,000
$ —
$ 2,030,000

(a) For Mr. Bellanti, amount also includes pro-rata payments of the 2012 and 2013 performance unit awards under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The awards were pro-rated through December 31, 2013 due to his retirement on January 1, 2014.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~(3)~~(4)

Reflects the annualized increase in pension value under the Salaried Retirement Program, the Albion Pension Plan and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (SERP). ~~There was a net negative change in pension values for 2013 of ($256,846) for Mr. Bellanti; ($104,383) for Mr. Satine and ($12,731,110) for Mr. R.E. Dauch.~~ See ~~also~~ Pension Benefits Table below. There are no above-market or preferential earnings on compensation deferred under our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.

~~(4)~~

(5) The components of All Other Compensation for ~~2013~~2016 are as follows:


Name	Employer 401(k) Match Contributions^(a) ($)	Retirement Contributions^(b) ($)	Executive Life Insurance Premiums^(c) ($)	Company-Provided Vehicles^(d) ($)	Tax Gross Ups for Spousal Travel^(e) ($)	Other^(f) ($)	Total ($)	Employer 401(k) Match Contributions^(a) ($)	Retirement Contributions^(b) ($)	Executive Life Insurance Premiums^(c) ($)	Company-Provided Vehicles^(d) ($)	Tax Gross Ups for Spousal Travel^(e) ($)	Other^(f) ($)	Total ($)
David C. Dauch	12,569	12,750	7,640	31,632	22,704	29,094	116,389	12,698	13,250	12,179	28,790	1,474	6,208	74,599
Christopher J. May								12,975	13,250	1,924	18,892	—	600	47,641
Michael K. Simonte	12,575	12,750	3,681	20,301	—	1,510	50,817	13,250	13,250	6,309	17,427	—	600	50,836
John J. Bellanti	8,750	12,750	7,155	14,188	424	1,973	45,240
Albert L. Satine	—	12,750	3,171	23,618	—	1,860	41,399
Alberto L. Satine								12,975	13,250	8,088	23,217	—	600	58,130
Norman Willemse	12,469	12,750	3,219	—	424	21,486	50,348	12,865	13,250	6,536	—	674	600	33,925
Richard E. Dauch	6,906	6,906	110,046	31,364	—	600	155,822

~~Table~~Stockholders have an opportunity to vote on a non-binding resolution to advise the Board of ~~Contents~~Directors on whether the advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation (say-on-pay) should occur every one, two or three years. Although this vote is advisory and non-binding, the Board will review voting results and give consideration to the outcome of the vote when making future decisions about the frequency of future say-on-pay proposals.

The Board believes that submitting the advisory vote on executive compensation to stockholders on an annual basis is the best approach for AAM and its stockholders. While the Board is recommending that you vote in favor of submitting advisory votes every year, you are not voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation. The proxy card provides you with a choice of voting to submit the say-on-pay proposal every one, two or three years, or of abstaining from voting. The frequency option that receives the most votes “for” of all votes cast on the proposal will be the frequency option approved by stockholders.

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote for the alternative of ONE YEAR for future advisory votes on executive compensation.

~~2013~~

2016 COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Total ~~2013~~2016 compensation of our non-employee directors is shown below.

Name
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash⁽¹⁾
($)
Stock Awards⁽²⁾
($)
All Other
Compensation⁽³⁾
($)
Total
($)
Salvatore J. Bonanno, Sr.⁽⁴⁾
43,667
—
—
43,667
Elizabeth A. Chappell 93,667
100,013
—
193,680
Forest J. Farmer 114,667
100,013
—
214,680
Steven B. Hantler 95,667
100,013
—
195,680
Richard C. Lappin 113,667
100,013
—
213,680
James A. McCaslin 99,667
100,013
—
199,680
William P. Miller II 103,667
100,013
—
203,680
John F. Smith 108,667
100,013
—
208,680
Larry K. Switzer 111,667
100,013
1,500
213,180
Samuel Valenti III⁽⁵⁾
—
—
—
—
Thomas K. Walker 147,667
100,013
—
247,680
Dr. Henry T. Yang⁽⁴⁾
42,667
—
—
42,667



Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash⁽¹⁾ ($)	Stock Awards⁽²⁾ ($)	All Other Compensation⁽³⁾ ($)	Total ($)
Elizabeth A. Chappell	120,000	110,015	2,000	232,015
Steven B. Hantler⁽⁴⁾	55,000	—	3,500	58,500
William L. Kozyra	110,000	110,015	2,000	222,015
Peter D. Lyons	110,000	110,015	500	220,515
James A. McCaslin	150,000	110,015	400	260,415
William P. Miller II	130,000	110,015	400	240,415
John F. Smith	120,000	110,015	400	230,415
Samuel Valenti III	110,000	110,015	1,000	221,015


(1)	~~For Mr. Walker, reflects an additional $10,000~~Fees earned in 2016 for services whether paid ~~for temporary services he provided~~ in ~~January 2013 as non-executive chairman.~~cash or deferred under the AAM Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.

(2)

Reflects the full grant date fair value of ~~equity~~restricted stock unit awards granted on May ~~2, 2013~~5, 2016 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718 (without any reduction for risk of forfeiture) as determined based on applying the assumptions used in our financial statements. The grant date fair value of equity awards is calculated using the closing market price of AAM common stock on the grant date of ~~$13.74.~~$14.97. See Note 7 to the audited consolidated financial statements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2016 regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards.

(3)

The Company reimburses non-employee directors for ~~their~~ travel and related out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending Board, committee and stockholder meetings. From time to time, the Company invites spouses of non-employee directors to attend Company events associated with these meetings. The Company pays for spousal travel and certain other expenses and reimburses non-employee directors for taxes attributable to the income associated with this benefit. Amounts reflect reimbursement of taxes on this income.


(4)	Mr. ~~Bonanno and Dr. Yang~~Hantler served on the Board through May ~~2, 2013.~~


~~(5)~~	~~Mr. Valenti joined the Board effective October 31, 2013 and received no compensation during 2013.~~5, 2016.

As of December 31, ~~2013,~~2016, each non-employee director had the following number of outstanding RSUs (including those deferred). No options ~~and RSUs, including RSUs deferred:~~were outstanding as of December 31, 2016.

Name
Option Awards
Outstanding
(#)
Restricted Stock
Units Outstanding
(#)
Elizabeth A. Chappell 5,000 27,113
Forest J. Farmer — 20,613
Steven B. Hantler — 16,013
Richard C. Lappin — 21,663
James A. McCaslin — 16,013
William P. Miller II 7,500 30,363
John F. Smith — 16,013
Larry K. Switzer 7,500 30,363
Samuel Valenti III — —
Thomas K. Walker — 23,863



Name	Restricted Stock Units Outstanding (#)
Elizabeth A. Chappell	43,933
William L. Kozyra	7,349
Peter D. Lyons	11,361
James A. McCaslin	32,833
William P. Miller II	47,183
John F. Smith	32,833
Samuel Valenti III	16,820

~~Table of Contents~~

Narrative Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation

~~2013~~2016 Annual Retainer and ~~Meeting Attendance Fees~~Committee Chair Retainers

Annual retainer $ 80,000
Board meeting attendance fee 1,500
Committee meeting attendance fee:
Committee chairman 3,000
Other committee members 2,000
Lead director annual retainer 20,000



Annual retainer	$	110,000
Committee chair annual retainer:
Audit Committee chair	20,000
Other committee chair	10,000
Lead director annual retainer	30,000

Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). Each non-employee director is entitled to receive an annual award of RSUs equal to a grant date value of ~~$100,000~~$110,000 on the date of the annual stockholder meeting. The awards are payable in stock and vest in one year, unless vesting is accelerated upon death, disability or a change in control.

Deferral. Non-employee directors may elect to defer, on a pre-tax basis, a portion of their retainer and meeting fees and receive tax-deferred earnings (or losses) on the deferrals under AAM’s Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. The rate of return on deferred amounts is based on the performance of selected benchmark funds identified in the plan, which is described in Nonqualified Deferred Compensation above. Non-employee directors may also elect to defer settlement of RSUs until after termination of service from the Board.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. The Compensation Committee has adopted non-employee director stock ownership guidelines equal to a multiple of ~~three~~five times the annual retainer. Non-employee directors are expected to meet the guidelines within three years from ~~April 2012 or, for new directors, within three years from~~ the date of election to the Board. Shares owned directly, deferred RSUs and unvested RSUs count toward the guidelines while unexercised stock options are not included. Each non-employee director has met the ownership guidelines or is on track to meet these ownership guidelines. Current stock ownership of non-employee directors is shown in the Security Ownership section below.

Anti-hedging and Anti-pledging policy. Non-employee directors are prohibited from entering into transactions that may result in a financial benefit if our stock price declines, or any hedging transaction involving our stock, including but not limited to the use of financial derivatives, short sales or any similar transactions. Pledging of Company stock is also ~~subject to our anti-hedging and anti-pledging restrictions.~~prohibited.

~~Table of Contents~~

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

The following tables show the number of shares of AAM common stock beneficially owned as of March ~~4, 2014~~7, 2017, 2017 (unless otherwise noted) by:

•each person known to us who beneficially owns more than 5% of AAM common stock;

•each of our non-employee directors and nominees;

•our named executive officers (unless otherwise noted); and

•all directors, nominees and executive officers as a group.

A beneficial owner of stock is a person who has voting power (the power to control voting decisions) or investment power (the power to cause the sale of the stock). All individuals listed in the tables have sole voting and investment power over the shares (unless otherwise noted).

The beneficial ownership calculation includes ~~75,646,724~~76,912,332 shares of AAM common stock outstanding on March ~~4, 2014.~~7, 2017.

MORE THAN 5% BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The table below shows the name, address and share ownership of each person or organization known by us to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of AAM’s common ~~stock.~~stock as of December 31, 2016.

Name and Address
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Percent of
Shares
Outstanding
Sandra J. Dauch⁽¹⁾
7,285,232 9.64
1430 Caxambas Court, Marco Island, FL 34145
JANA Partners LLC⁽²⁾
6,663,698 8.80
767 Fifth Avenue, 8th Floor New York, NY 10153
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC⁽³⁾
4,982,055 6.59
2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor Dallas, TX 75201
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and Columbia Management
Investment Advisers LLC⁽⁴⁾
4,883,368 6.46
145 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474



Name and Address	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned	Percent of Shares Outstanding
The Vanguard Group⁽¹⁾	9,643,121	12.60
100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355
Blackrock, Inc.⁽²⁾	9,591,550	12.50
55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC⁽³⁾	4,362,951	5.71
2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor, Dallas TX 75201
Robert Polak, Anchor Bolt Capital, LP⁽⁴⁾	3,983,389	5.21
300 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1875, Chicago, Illinois 60654


(1)	Based on the Schedule 13G filed on February ~~14, 2014~~9, 2017 by ~~Sandra J. Dauch,~~The Vanguard Group, reporting sole voting power over ~~7,243,522 shares, shared voting power over 41,710~~151,979 shares, sole investment power over ~~7,243,522~~9,486,224, shared voting power over 8,600 shares and shared investment power over ~~41,710~~156,897 shares.


(2)	Based on the Schedule 13G filed on ~~February 14, 2014~~January 12, 2017 by ~~JANA Partners, LLC,~~Blackrock, Inc., reporting sole voting power over ~~6,663,698~~9,435,372 shares and sole investment power over ~~6,663,698~~9,591,550 shares.


(3)	Based on the Schedule 13G filed on February ~~12, 2014~~9, 2017 by Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC, reporting sole voting power over 2,548,692 shares, shared voting power over ~~2,368,600 shares, sole voting power over 2,613,455~~1,814,259 shares and sole investment power over ~~4,982,055~~4,362,951 shares.


(4)	Based on the Schedule 13G filed ~~jointly~~ on February ~~13, 2014~~14, 2017 by ~~Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC,~~Robert Polak, Anchor Bolt Capital, LP, reporting ~~shared~~sole voting power over ~~204,753 shares and shared investment power over 4,883,368~~3,983,389 shares.

~~Table of Contents~~

DIRECTORS, NOMINEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Shares
Beneficially
Owned⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Percent of
Shares
Outstanding
Directors
Elizabeth A. Chappell 33,113
*
Forest J. Farmer 42,081
*
Steven B. Hantler 21,013
*
Richard C. Lappin 30,463
*
James A. McCaslin 20,013
*
William P. Miller II 43,863
*
John F. Smith 21,013
*
Larry K. Switzer 38,863
*
Samuel Valenti III —
—
Thomas K. Walker 34,863
*
Named Executive Officers⁽³⁾

David C. Dauch⁽⁴⁾
91,131
*
Michael K. Simonte 34,001
*
John J. Bellanti⁽⁵⁾
70,245
*
Alberto L. Satine 22,739
*
Norman Willemse 25,291
*
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (27 persons) 734,959
1.0



	Shares Beneficially Owned⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	Percent of Shares Outstanding
Non-Employee Directors and Nominees
Elizabeth A. Chappell	45,909	*
William L. Kozyra	11,361	*
Peter D. Lyons	16,361	*
James A. McCaslin	36,833	*
William P. Miller II	54,883	*
John F. Smith	37,833	*
Samuel Valenti III	26,820	*
Named Executive Officers
David C. Dauch⁽³⁾	310,352	*
Christopher J. May	16,415	*
Michael K. Simonte	86,521	*
Alberto L. Satine	33,349	*
Norman Willemse	29,849	*
Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers as a Group (15 persons)	741,226	*

(*) Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of AAM common stock.


(1)	Includes vested RSUs awarded to non-employee directors that have been deferred. For the number of RSUs held by each non-employee director, see table to the ~~2013~~2016 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors.

(2)

Includes the following number of shares of common stock which may be acquired upon exercise of options that were ~~exercisable or would become exercisable within 60 days: 5,000 for Ms. Chappell; 7,500~~exercisable: 13,000 for Mr. ~~Miller and Mr. Switzer; 40,000 for Mr. D.C.~~ Dauch; ~~29,000~~10,000 for Mr. Simonte; ~~36,700 for Mr. Bellanti; 16,000~~8,000 for Mr. Satine; and 9,700 for Mr. Willemse.


(3)	~~Does not include Mr. R.E. Dauch, who passed away on August 2, 2013.~~


~~(4)~~	Includes 548 shares held in trusts for the benefit of Mr. ~~D.C.~~ Dauch’s children.


~~(5)~~	~~Includes 10,000 shares held by Mr. Bellanti's spouse.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock. Based solely on our review of these reports, and written representations from such reporting persons, we believe that the Section 16(a) filing requirements for such reporting persons were met during ~~2013.~~2016.

~~Table of Contents~~

PROPOSAL 3:5: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR ~~2014~~2017

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of AAM has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to examine the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, ~~2014.~~2017. Although ratification is not required by our ~~bylaws~~by-laws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether the appointment is appropriate and will use its discretion in determining whether the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will attend the ~~2014~~2017 annual meeting and be available to make a statement or respond to appropriate questions.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for ~~2014.~~2017.

AUDIT COMMITTEE DISCLOSURE

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the Company’s financial reporting process by monitoring, among other matters, the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the independence and performance of Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and the performance of the Company’s internal auditors. Management has primary responsibility for preparing the consolidated financial statements and for the reporting processes, including the design and maintenance of the Company’s system of internal controls. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the Company’s consolidated financial statements and opining upon the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The Audit Committee is solely responsible for the compensation, appointment and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management, D&T and the internal auditors, separately and together, with and without management present, regarding the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2013,~~2016, and the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. The Audit Committee also discussed with D&T the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, applicable rules of the SEC, and other relevant professional and regulatory standards, which include, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Further, the Audit Committee discussed with the internal auditors the Company’s plans for and scope of internal audits, identification of audit risks and results of audit activities.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with D&T the auditor’s independence from the Company and the Company’s management. As part of that review, D&T submitted to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by requirements of the PCAOB regarding D&T’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence. Further, the Audit Committee discussed with D&T the firm’s independence and considered whether D&T’s performance of non-audit services to the Company was compatible with maintaining D&T’s independence. The Audit Committee concluded that D&T is independent from the Company and its management.

Based on the considerations described above and the limitations of the role and responsibilities of the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2016 be included in the Company’s ~~2013~~2016 annual report on Form 10-K.

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors*Directors

William P. Miller II, Chairman

Peter D. Lyons

John F. Smith

~~Larry K. Switzer~~

~~Thomas K. Walker~~

*Samuel Valenti III ~~whose service on the Audit Committee began in February 2014, did not participate in the preparation of this report.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Policy for Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee’s policy is to approve in advance all audit and permitted non-audit services (including scope, fee structure and the potential effect of the service on the auditor’s independence) to be performed for the Company by its independent registered public accounting firm. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. The Chairman of the Audit Committee may pre-approve permissible non-audit services that arise between Audit Committee meetings, provided the fees do not exceed a limit established by the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee is informed of the decision to pre-approve the service at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee received regular updates on the amount of fees and scope of audit, non-audit and tax services provided by D&T during ~~2013.~~2016. All services provided by D&T during fiscal ~~2013~~2016 were authorized and approved by the Audit Committee in compliance with applicable pre-approval policies and procedures.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees

The following table shows the fees for professional services rendered by D&T for the audit of the Company's financial statements for the years ended December 31, ~~2013~~2016 and December 31, ~~2012,~~2015, and fees billed for other services rendered by D&T, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates during those periods.


	December 31,				December 31,
	2013		2012		2016		2015
Audit Fees⁽¹⁾	$	1,615,877	$	1,357,550	$	1,969,240	$	2,110,826
Audit Related Fees⁽²⁾	—		—		306,192		25,700
Tax Fees⁽³⁾	151,000		80,539		310,000		505,500
All Other Fees⁽⁴⁾	90,000		—		40,000		164,095
Total	$	1,856,877	$	1,438,089	$	2,625,432	$	2,806,121


(1)	Audit fees include fees for the audit of annual consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting, reviews of quarterly consolidated financial statements, statutory audits, consents and comfort letters, reviews of documents filed with the SEC and other services related to SEC matters.


(2)	Audit-related fees are for services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. This category also refers to fees for the audit of employee benefit plans.


(3)	Fees for tax services in ~~2013~~2016 and ~~2012~~2015 consisted of fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.


(4)	Other fees in ~~2013 are~~2016 and 2015 consisted of fees for advisory services ~~provided~~related to government grants to a foreign ~~subsidiary in connection with a government grant application.~~subsidiary.

~~Table of Contents~~

OTHER MATTERS

Expenses of Solicitation

The Board is soliciting your proxy, and the expense of soliciting proxies will be borne by AAM. Proxy materials were distributed by mail by Computershare Trust Company, N.A. In addition, AAM will reimburse brokers, banks and other holders of record for their expenses in forwarding proxy materials to stockholders.

We have retained Georgeson Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of $11,000 plus reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses. Georgeson may be contacted at ~~(888) 607-6511.~~(866) 413-5899. In addition, our officers and certain other employees may solicit proxies personally or by telephone, fax or e-mail. They will receive no special compensation for these services.

Stockholder Proposals for ~~2015~~2018 Annual Meeting

Under SEC rules, stockholder proposals for the ~~2015~~2018 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Secretary of AAM at One Dauch Drive, Detroit, MI 48211-1198, on or before November 20, ~~2014~~2017 in order to be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s ~~2015~~2018 proxy materials. In addition, AAM’s ~~bylaws~~by-laws require stockholders intending to present any matter for consideration at the ~~2015~~2018 annual meeting of stockholders, other than through inclusion in our proxy materials, to notify AAM’s Secretary in writing at the above address on or before February ~~20, 2015,~~23, 2018, but no earlier than ~~January 31, 2015.~~February 3, 2018.

Obtaining a copy of ~~2013~~2016 Form 10-K

AAM will furnish to stockholders without charge a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013.~~2016. Requests should be directed to American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., Investor Relations Department, One Dauch Drive, Detroit, MI 48211-1198, or by e-mail to investorrelations@aam.com. The ~~2013~~2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K is available on our website at http://investor.aam.com.

53Appendix A

Amended and Restated

American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.

2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan

ARTICLE 1. ESTABLISHMENT, PURPOSE AND DURATION

1.1 Establishment. American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, establishes an incentive compensation plan to be known as the Amended and Restated American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as set forth in this document. This Plan permits the grant of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards. This Plan shall become effective on May 4, 2017 (the “Effective Date”) and shall remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3.

1.2 Purpose of this Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to foster and promote the long-term financial success of the Company and materially increase shareholder value by (a) motivating superior performance by means of performance-related incentives, (b) encouraging and providing for the acquisition of an ownership interest in the Company by Employees as well as Non-Employee Directors, and (c) enabling the Company to attract and retain qualified and competent persons to serve as members of an outstanding management team and the Board of Directors of the Company upon whose judgment, interest, and performance are required for the successful and sustained operations of the Company.

1.3 Duration of this Plan. Unless sooner terminated as provided herein, this Plan shall terminate ten (10) years from the Effective Date. After this Plan is terminated, no Awards may be granted but Awards previously granted shall remain outstanding in accordance with their applicable terms and conditions and this Plan’s terms and conditions.

ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS

Whenever used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below, and when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word shall be capitalized.

2.1 “Annual Award Limit” or “Annual Award Limits” have the meaning set forth in Section 4.3.

2.2 “Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under this Plan of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards, in each case subject to the terms of this Plan.

2.3 “Award Agreement”means either (i) a written or electronic agreement entered into by the Company and a Participant setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to an Award granted under this Plan, including any amendment or modification thereof, or (ii) a written or electronic statement issued by the Company to a Participant describing the terms and provisions of such Award, including any amendment or modification thereof. The Committee may provide for the use of electronic, Internet or other non-paper Award Agreements, and the use of electronic, Internet or other non-paper means for the acceptance thereof and actions thereunder by a Participant. The Committee shall have the exclusive authority to determine the terms of an Award Agreement evidencing an Award granted under this Plan, subject to the provisions herein. The terms of an Award Agreement need not be uniform among all Participants or among similar types of Awards.

2.4 “Beneficial Owner” or “Beneficial Ownership” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.

2.5 “Board” or“Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

2.6 “Cash-Based Award” means an Award, denominated in cash, granted to a Participant as described in Article 12.

2.7 “Code” means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time and the applicable regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder and any successor or similar provision.

2.8 “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or a subcommittee thereof or any other committee designated by the Board to administer this Plan. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by and shall serve at the discretion of the Board. If the Committee does not exist or cannot function for any reason, the Board may take any action under the Plan that would otherwise be the responsibility of the Committee in which case references to the “Committee” shall be deemed references to the Board. The Committee shall be constituted to comply with the requirements of Rule 16(b) of the Exchange Act, Code Section 162(m) and any applicable listing or governance requirements of any securities exchange on which the Shares are listed; provided, however, that, if any Committee member is found not to have met the qualification requirements of Code Section 162(m) and Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, any actions taken or Awards granted by the Committee shall not be invalidated by such failure to so qualify.

2.9 “Change in Control” means any one of the following:

(a) any person or entity, including a “group” as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act other than the Company or a wholly-owned Subsidiary thereof or any employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, becomes the beneficial owner of the Company’s securities having 30% or more of the combined voting power of the then outstanding securities of the Company that may be cast for the election of Directors of the Company (other than as a result of an issuance of securities initiated by the Company in the ordinary course of business);

(b) as the result of, or in connection with, any cash tender or exchange offer, merger or other business combination, sale of assets or contested election, or any combination of the foregoing transactions, less than a majority of the combined voting power of the then outstanding securities of the Company or any successor corporation or entity entitled to vote generally in the election of the Directors of the Company or such other corporation or entity after such transaction are held in the aggregate by the holders of the Company’s securities entitled to vote generally in the election of Directors of the Company immediately prior to such transaction;

(c) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of any such period constitute the Board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, unless the election, or the nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, of each Director of the Company first elected during such period was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Directors of the Company then still in office who were Directors of the Company at the beginning of any such period; or

(d) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, other than a liquidation of the Company into a wholly owned subsidiary.

2.10 “Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share, or such other class of share or other securities as may be applicable under Section 4.4 of the Plan.

2.11 “Company” means American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., and any successor thereto as provided in Section 23.23.

2.12 “Covered Employee” means any Employee who is or may become a “Covered Employee,” as defined in Code Section 162(m), and who is designated, either as an individual Employee or class of Employees, by the Committee within the shorter of (i) 90 days after the beginning of the Performance Period, or (ii) 25% of the Performance Period has elapsed, as a “Covered Employee” under this Plan for such applicable Performance Period.

2.13 “Director” means any individual who is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.

2.14 “Disability” meanseither of the following: (a) inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months; or (b) by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be

expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than 3 months under an accident and health plan covering Employees.

2.15 “Dividend Equivalent” has the meaning set forth in Article 18.

2.16 “Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.

2.17 “Employee” means any individual performing services for the Company or a Subsidiary and designated as an employee of the Company or the Subsidiary on its payroll records. An Employee shall not include any individual during any period he or she is classified or treated by the Company or Subsidiary as an independent contractor, a consultant or an employee of an employment, consulting or temporary agency or any other entity other than the Company or Subsidiary, without regard to whether such individual is subsequently determined to have been, or is subsequently retroactively reclassified, as a common-law employee of the Company or Subsidiary during such period. An individual shall not cease to be an Employee in the case of (i) any leave of absence approved by the Company or (ii) transfers between locations of the Company or between the Company or any Subsidiaries. For purposes of Incentive Stock Options, no such leave may exceed 90 days, unless reemployment upon expiration of such leave is guaranteed by statute or contract. If reemployment upon expiration of a leave of absence approved by the Company is not so guaranteed, then three months following the 91st day of such leave, any Incentive Stock Option held by a Participant shall cease to be treated as an Incentive Stock Option and shall be treated for tax purposes as a Nonqualified Stock Option. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee by the Company shall be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company.

2.18 “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, or any successor act thereto and the regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder.

2.19 “Fair Market Value”or “FMV” means, with respect to a Share, the fair market value thereof as of the relevant date of determination, as determined in accordance with the valuation methodology approved by the Committee (based on objective criteria) from time to time. In the absence of any alternative valuation methodology approved by the Committee, Fair Market Value shall be deemed to be equal to the closing selling price of a Share on the trading day immediately preceding the date on which such valuation is made on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), or such established national securities exchange as may be designated by the Committee or, in the event that the Common Stock is not listed for trading on the NYSE or such other national securities exchange as may be designated by the Committee but is quoted on an automated system, in any such case on the valuation date (or, if there were no sales on the valuation date, the average of the highest and lowest quoted selling prices as reported on said composite tape or automated system for the most recent day during which a sale occurred). The definition of FMV may differ depending on whether FMV is in reference to the grant, exercise, vesting, settlement or payout of an Award.

2.20 “Grant Date” means the date an Award is granted to a Participant pursuant to the Plan.

2.21 “Grant Price” means the price established at the time of grant of an SAR pursuant to Article 7.

2.22 “Incentive Stock Option”or “ISO” means an Award granted pursuant to Article 6 that is designated as an Incentive Stock Option and that is intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422 or any successor provision.

2.23 “Insider” shall mean an individual who is, on the relevant date, an officer (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act (or any successor provision)) or Director of the Company, or a more than 10% Beneficial Owner of any class of the Company’s equity securities that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, as determined by the Board in accordance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

2.24 “Non-Employee Director” means a Director who is not an Employee.

2.25 “Nonqualified Stock Option”or “NQSO” means an Award granted pursuant to Article 6 that is not intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422, or that otherwise does not meet such requirements.

2.26 “Option” means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 6, which Award may be an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option.

2.27 “Option Price” means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant pursuant to an Option.

2.28 “Other Stock-Based Award” means an equity-based or equity‑related Award not otherwise described by the terms of this Plan that is granted pursuant to Article 12.

2.29 “Participant” means any eligible individual as set forth in Article 5 to whom an Award is granted.

2.30 “Performance-Based Compensation”means compensation under an Award that is intended to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for certain performance-based compensation paid to Covered Employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Plan shall be construed to mean that an Award that does not satisfy the requirements for performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) does not constitute performance-based compensation for other purposes, including Code Section 409A.

2.31 “Performance Measures” means measures, as described in Article 14, upon which performance goals are based and that are approved by the Company’s shareholders pursuant to this Plan in order to qualify Awards as Performance-Based Compensation.

2.32 “Performance Period” means the period of time during which pre‑established performance goals must be met in order to determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to an Award.

2.33 “Performance Share” means an Award granted pursuant to Article 10.

2.34 “Performance Unit” means an Award granted pursuant to Article 11.

2.35 “Period of Restriction” means the period when Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (based on the passage of time, the achievement of performance goals or upon the occurrence of other events as determined by the Committee, in its discretion) as provided in Articles 8 and 9.

2.36 “Person”shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, including a “group” as defined in Section 13(d) thereof.

2.37 “Plan” means the Amended and Restated American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as may be amended from time to time.

2.38 “Restricted Stock” means an Award granted pursuant to Article 8.

2.39 “Restricted Stock Unit” means an Award granted pursuant to Article 9.

2.40 “Retirement” means the Participant’s voluntary resignation at any time (i) after attaining age 65, or (ii) after attaining age 55 but prior to age 65 with ten or more years of continuous service with the Company or a Subsidiary.

2.41 “Share” means a share of Common Stock.

2.42 “Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR”means an Award granted pursuant to Article 7.

2.43 “Subsidiary” means (i) a corporation or other entity (domestic or foreign) with respect to which the Company, directly or indirectly, has the power, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise, to elect at least a majority of the members of such corporation’s board of directors or analogous governing body, or (ii) any other corporation or entity in which the Company, directly or indirectly, has an equity or similar interest and which the Committee designates as a Subsidiary for purposes of the Plan.

2.44 “Successor”has the meaning set forth in Section 23.23.

2.45 “Termination of Employment” means the termination of the Participant’s employment with the Company and the Subsidiaries, regardless of the reason for the termination of employment.

2.46 “Termination of Directorship” means the time when a Non‑Employee Director ceases to be a Non-Employee Director for any reason, including, but not by way of limitation, a termination by resignation, failure to be elected or death.

2.47 “Third-Party Service Provider” means any consultant, agent, advisor or independent contractor who renders bona fide services to the Company or a Subsidiary that (a) are not in connection with the offer and sale of the Company’s securities in a capital raising transaction, (b) do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities, and (c) are provided by a natural person who has contracted directly with the Company or Subsidiary to render such services.

ARTICLE 3. ADMINISTRATION

3.1 General. The Committee shall be responsible for administering this Plan, subject to this Article 3 and the other provisions of this Plan. The Committee may employ attorneys, consultants, accountants, agents and other individuals, any of whom may be an Employee, and the Committee, the Company, and its officers and Directors shall be entitled to rely upon the advice, opinions or valuations of any such individuals. No member of the Committee shall be liable for any action taken or not taken in reliance upon any such information and/or advice. All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Committee shall be made in its sole discretion and shall be final, binding and conclusive upon the Participants, the Company or Subsidiary, and all other interested individuals.

3.2 Authority of the Committee. Subject to any express limitations set forth in the Plan, the Committee shall have full and exclusive discretionary power and authority to take such actions as it deems necessary and advisable with respect to the administration, interpretation and implementation of the Plan including, but not limited to, the following:

(a) To determine from time to time which of the persons eligible under the Plan shall be granted Awards, when and how each Award shall be granted, what type or combination of types of Awards shall be granted, the provisions of each Award granted (which need not be identical), including the time or times when a person shall be permitted to receive Shares pursuant to an Award and the number of Shares subject to an Award;

(b) To construe and interpret the Plan and Awards granted under it, and to establish, amend, and revoke rules and regulations for its administration. The Committee, in the exercise of this power, may correct any defect, omission or inconsistency in the Plan or in an Award Agreement, in a manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or expedient to make the Plan fully effective;

(d) To determine Fair Market Value of a Share in accordance with Section 2.19 of the Plan;

(e) To amend the Plan, an Award or any Award Agreement after the date of grant subject to the terms of the Plan;

(f) To adopt sub-plans and/or special provisions applicable to stock awards regulated by the laws of a jurisdiction other than and outside of the United States. Such sub-plans and/or special provisions may take precedence over other provisions of the Plan, but unless otherwise superseded by the terms of such sub-plans and/or special provisions, the provisions of the Plan shall govern;

(g) To authorize any person to execute on behalf of the Company any instrument required to effect the grant of an Award previously granted by the Board;

(h) To determine whether Awards will be settled in Shares, cash or in any combination thereof;

(i) To determine whether Awards will provide for Dividend Equivalents;

(j) To establish a program whereby Participants designated by the Committee may elect to receive Awards under the Plan in lieu of compensation otherwise payable in cash; and

(k) To impose such restrictions, conditions or limitations as it determines appropriate as to the timing and manner of any resales by a Participant or other subsequent transfers by a Participant of any Shares, including, without limitation, restrictions under an insider trading policy and restrictions as to the use of a specified brokerage firm for such resales or other transfers.

3.3 Delegation. To the extent not prohibited by applicable laws, rules and regulations, the Committee may delegate to (i) one or more of its members, (ii) one or more officers of the Company or any Subsidiary or (iii) one or more agents or advisors such administrative duties or powers as it may deem appropriate or advisable under such conditions and limitations as the Committee may set at the time of such delegation or thereafter. The Committee or any individuals to whom it has delegated duties or powers as aforesaid may employ one or more individuals to render advice with respect to any responsibility the Committee or such individuals may have under this Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may not delegate its authority (i) to make Awards to Employees (A) who are Insiders, (B) whose compensation for such fiscal year may be subject to the limit on deductible compensation pursuant to Code Section 162(m) or (C) who are officers of the Company who are delegated authority by the Committee hereunder, or (ii) pursuant to Section 21 of the Plan. For purposes of the Plan, reference to the Committee shall be deemed to refer to any subcommittee, subcommittees, or other persons or groups of persons to whom the Committee delegates authority pursuant to this Section 3.3.

ARTICLE 4. SHARES SUBJECT TO THIS PLAN AND MAXIMUM AWARDS

4.1 Number of Shares Authorized and Available for Awards. Subject to adjustment as provided under the Plan, the maximum number of Shares that are available for Awards under the Plan shall be 9,200,000 Shares. Such Shares may be authorized and unissued Shares, Shares that have been reacquired by the Company, treasury Shares or any combination of the foregoing, as may be determined from time to time by the Board or by the Committee. Any of the authorized Shares may be used for any type of Award under the Plan, and any or all of the Shares may be allocated to Incentive Stock Options.

4.2 Share Usage. The number of Shares remaining available for issuance will be reduced by the number of Shares subject to outstanding Awards and, for Awards that are not denominated by Shares, by the number of Shares actually delivered upon settlement or payment of the Award. For purposes of determining the number of Shares that remain available for issuance under the Plan, the number of Shares related to an Award granted under this Plan that terminates by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise without the issuance of the Shares, shall be available again for grant under this Plan. The following Shares, however, shall not be available again for grant under this Plan;

(a) Shares not issued or delivered as a result of net settlement of an outstanding Option or SAR;

(b) Shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the exercise price of or withholding taxes with respect to an Option; and

4.3 Annual Award Limits. Subject to adjustments pursuant to Section 4.4 and, in the case of Non-Employee Directors, Section 16.1:

(a) the maximum number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to Options and SARs granted to any Participant in any calendar year shall be 2,000,000 Shares;

(b) the maximum number of Shares that may be paid to any Participant in any calendar year under an Award of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares or Other Stock Based Awards shall be 2,000,000 Shares determined as of the date of grant; and

(c) the maximum aggregate amount that may be paid to any Participant in any calendar year under an Award of Performance Units, Cash-Based Awards or any other Award that is payable in cash shall be $6,000,000, determined as of the date of grant.

4.4 Adjustments in Authorized Shares. Adjustment in authorized Shares available for issuance under the Plan or under an outstanding Award and adjustments in Annual Award Limits shall be subject to the following provisions:

(a) In the event of any corporate event or transaction such as a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, separation, reclassification, partial or complete liquidation, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split up, spin-off, distribution of stock or property of the Company, combination of Shares, exchange of Shares, dividend in kind, extraordinary cash dividend, rights offering to purchase Shares at a price that is substantially below FMV or any other similar corporate event or transaction (“Corporate Transactions”), the Committee, in order to preserve, but not increase, Participants’ rights under this Plan, shall substitute or adjust, as applicable, (1) the number and kind of Shares that may be issued under this Plan or under particular forms of Awards, (2) the number and kind of Shares subject to outstanding Awards (including by payment of cash to a Participant), (3) the Option Price or Grant Price applicable to outstanding Awards, and (4) the Annual Award Limits and other value determinations applicable to outstanding Awards. The Committee, in its discretion, shall determine the methodology or manner of making such substitution or adjustment subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations.

(b) In addition to the adjustments permitted under paragraph 4.4(a) above, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may make such other adjustments or modifications in the terms of any Award that it deems appropriate to reflect any Corporate Transaction, including, but not limited to, modifications of performance goals and changes in the length of Performance Periods, subject to the limitations set forth in Section 14.4.

(c) The determination of the Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be conclusive and binding on Participants under this Plan. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, such adjusted Awards shall be subject to the same restrictions and vesting or settlement schedule to which the underlying Award is subject.

ARTICLE 5. ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION

5.1 Eligibility to Receive Awards. Individuals eligible to participate in this Plan include all Employees, Directors and Third-Party Service Providers.

5.2 Participation in the Plan. Subject to the provisions of this Plan, the Committee may, from time to time, select from all individuals eligible to participate in the Plan, those individuals to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine, in its sole discretion, the nature of any and all terms permissible by law and the amount of each Award.

ARTICLE 6. STOCK OPTIONS

6.1 Grant of Options. Options may be granted to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. Each grant of an Option shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement which shall specify whether the Option is in the form of a Nonqualified Stock Option or an Incentive Stock Option.

6.2 Option Price. The Option Price for each grant of an Option shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and shall be specified in the Award Agreement evidencing such Option; provided, however, the Option Price must be at least equal to 100% of the FMV of a Share as of the Option’s Grant Date, subject to adjustment as provided for under Section 4.4.

6.3 Term of Option. The term of an Option granted to a Participant shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion; provided, however, no Option shall be exercisable later than the tenth anniversary date of its grant. If upon the expiration of the term of an Option (other than an Incentive Stock Option), a Participant is prohibited from trading in the Shares by applicable laws, rules or regulations or the Company’s insider trading plan as in effect from time to time, the term of the Option shall be automatically extended to the 30th day following the expiration of such prohibition; provided, however, that this provision shall not apply if prohibited by applicable laws, rules and regulations in effect from time to time.

6.4 Exercise of Option. An Option shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve, which terms and restrictions need not be the same for each grant or for each Participant.

6.5 Payment of Option Price. An Option shall be exercised by the delivery of a notice of exercise to the Company or an agent designated by the Company in a form specified or accepted by the Committee, or by complying with any alternative procedures that may be authorized by the Committee, setting forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised, accompanied by full payment for the Shares. A condition of the issuance of the Shares as to which an Option shall be exercised shall be the payment of the Option Price. The Option Price of any exercised Option shall be payable to the Company in accordance with one of the following methods:

(a) in cash or its equivalent;

(b) by tendering (either by actual delivery or attestation) previously acquired Shares having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the Option Price;

(c) by a cashless (broker-assisted) exercise in accordance with procedures authorized by the Committee from time to time;

(d) through net share settlement or similar procedure involving the withholding of Shares subject to the Option with a value equal to the Option Price;

(e) by any combination of (a), (b), (c) and (d); or

(f) any other method approved or accepted by the Committee in its sole discretion.

Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, all payments under all of the methods indicated above shall be paid in United States dollars or Shares, as applicable.

6.6 Special Rules Regarding ISOs. The terms of any Incentive Stock Option (“ISO”) granted under the Plan shall comply in all respects with the provisions of Code Section 422, or any successor provision thereto, as amended from time to time. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, an Option granted in the form of an ISO to a Participant shall be subject to the following rules:

(a) Special ISO definitions:

(i) “Parent Corporation” shall mean as of any applicable date a corporation in respect of the Company that is a parent corporation within the meaning of Code Section 424(e).

(ii) “ISO Subsidiary” shall mean as of any applicable date any corporation in respect of the Company that is a subsidiary corporation within the meaning of Code Section 424(f).

(iii) A “10% Owner” is an individual who owns stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or its Parent Corporation or any ISO Subsidiary.

(b) Eligible Employees. An ISO may be granted solely to eligible Employees of the Company, Parent Corporation, or ISO Subsidiary.

(c) Specified as an ISO. An Award Agreement evidencing the grant of an ISO shall specify that such grant is intended to be an ISO.

(d) Option Price. The Option Price for each grant of an ISO shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and shall be specified in the Award Agreement; provided, however, the Option Price must be at least equal 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share as of the ISO’s Grant Date (in the case of 10% Owners, the Option Price may not be not less than 110% of such Fair Market Value), subject to adjustment provided for under Section 4.4.

(e) Right to Exercise. Any ISO granted to a Participant shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime solely by such Participant.

(f) Exercise Period. The period during which a Participant may exercise an ISO shall not exceed ten years (five years in the case of a Participant who is a 10% Owner) from the date on which the ISO was granted.

(g) Termination of Employment. In the event a Participant terminates employment due to death or Disability (as defined in Code Section 22(e)(3)), the Participant (or, in the case of death, the person(s) to whom the Option is transferred by will or the laws of descent and distribution) shall have the right to exercise the Participant’s ISO award during the period specified in the applicable Award Agreement solely to the extent the Participant had the right to exercise the ISO on the date of his death or Disability; as applicable, provided, however, that such period may not exceed one year from the date of such termination of employment or if shorter, the remaining term of the ISO. In the event a Participant terminates employment for reasons other than death or Disability, the Participant shall have the right to exercise the Participant’s ISO during the period specified in the applicable Award Agreement solely to the extent the Participant had the right to exercise the ISO on the date of such termination of employment; provided, however, that such period may not exceed three months from the date of such termination of employment or if shorter, the remaining term of the ISO.

(h) Dollar Limitation. To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of (i) the Shares with respect to which Options designated as Incentive Stock Options plus (ii) the shares of stock of the Company, Parent Corporation and any ISO Subsidiary with respect to which other Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a holder of such Incentive Stock Options during any calendar year under all plans of the Company and ISO Subsidiary exceeds $100,000, such Options shall be treated as Nonqualified Stock Options. For purposes of the preceding sentence, Options shall be taken into account in the order in which they were granted, and the Fair Market Value of the Shares shall be determined as of the time the Option or other incentive stock option is granted.

(i) Duration of Plan. No ISO may be granted more than ten years after the earlier of (a) adoption of this Plan by the Board and (b) the Effective Date.

(j) Notification of Disqualifying Disposition. If any Participant shall make any disposition of Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of an ISO, such Participant shall notify the Company of such disposition within 30 days thereof. The Company shall use such information to determine whether a disqualifying disposition as described in Code Section 421(b) has occurred.

(k) Transferability. No ISO may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution; provided, however, that at the discretion of the Committee, an ISO may be transferred to a grantor trust under which Participant making the transfer is the sole beneficiary.

ARTICLE 7. STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

7.1 Grant of SARs. SARs may be granted to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. Each grant of SARs shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement.

7.2 Grant Price. The Grant Price for each grant of an SAR shall be determined by the Committee and shall be specified in the Award Agreement evidencing the SAR; provided, however, the Grant Price must be at least equal to 100% of the FMV of a Share as of the Grant Date, subject to adjustment as provided for under Section 4.4.

7.3 Term of SAR. The term of an SAR granted to a Participant shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion; provided, however, no SAR shall be exercisable later than the tenth anniversary date of its grant.

7.4 Exercise of SAR. An SAR shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve, which terms and restrictions need not be the same for each grant or for each Participant.

7.5 Notice of Exercise. An SAR shall be exercised by the delivery of a notice of exercise to the Company or an agent designated by the Company in a form specified or accepted by the Committee, or by complying with any alternative procedures that may be authorized by the Committee, setting forth the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is to be exercised.

7.6 Settlement of SARs. Upon the exercise of an SAR, pursuant to a notice of exercise properly completed and submitted to the Company in accordance with Section 7.5, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount equal to the product of (a) and (b) below:

(a) The excess of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over the Grant Price.

(b) The number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised.

Payment shall be made in cash, Shares or a combination thereof as specified in the Award Agreement.

ARTICLE 8. RESTRICTED STOCK

8.1 Grant of Restricted Stock. Restricted Stock may be granted to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. Each grant of Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement.

8.2 Nature of Restrictions. Each grant of Restricted Stock shall subject to a Restriction Period that shall lapse upon the satisfaction of such conditions and restrictions as are determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and set forth in an applicable Award Agreement. Such conditions or restrictions may include, without limitation, one or more of the following:

(a) A requirement that a Participant pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of Restricted Stock;

(b) Restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance goals;

(d) Time-based restrictions; and/or

(e) Restrictions under applicable laws and restrictions under the requirements of any stock exchange or market on which such Shares are listed or traded.

8.3 Issuance of Shares. To the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, the Company may retain the certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock in the Company’s possession until such time as all conditions or restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or lapse. Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock grant shall become freely transferable by the Participant after all conditions and restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or lapsed (including satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding obligations).

8.4 Shareholder Rights. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee and set forth in a Participant’s applicable Award Agreement, to the extent permitted or required by law a Participant holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder shall be granted full rights as a shareholder (including voting rights) with respect to those Shares during the Period of Restriction.

ARTICLE 9. RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

9.1 Grant of Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units may be granted to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. A grant of a Restricted Stock Unit or Restricted Stock Units shall not represent the grant of Shares but shall represent a promise to deliver a corresponding number of Shares or the value of each Share based upon the completion of service, performance conditions, or such other terms

and conditions as specified in the applicable Award Agreement over the Restriction Period. Each grant of Restricted Stock Units shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement.

9.2 Nature of Restrictions. Each grant of Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to a Restriction Period that shall lapse upon the satisfaction of such conditions and restrictions as are determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and set forth in an applicable Award Agreement. Such conditions or restrictions may include, without limitation, one or more of the following:

(a) A requirement that a Participant pay a stipulated purchase price for each Restricted Stock Unit;

(b) Restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance goals;

(d) Time-based restrictions; and/or

(e) Restrictions under applicable laws or under the requirements of any stock exchange on which Shares are listed or traded.

9.3 Settlement and Payment Restricted Stock Units. Unless otherwise elected by the Participant or otherwise provided for in the Award Agreement, Restricted Stock Units shall be settled upon the date such Restricted Stock Units vest. Such settlement may be made in Shares, cash or a combination thereof, as specified in the Award Agreement.

ARTICLE 10. PERFORMANCE SHARES

10.1 Grant of Performance Shares. Performance Shares may be granted to Participants in such number, and upon such terms and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. Each grant of Performance Shares shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement.

10.2 Value of Performance Shares. Each Performance Share shall have an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Grant Date. The Committee shall set performance goals in its discretion that, depending on the extent to which they are met over the specified Performance Period, shall determine the number of Performance Shares that shall be paid to a Participant.

10.3 Earning of Performance Shares. After the applicable Performance Period has ended, the number of Performance Shares earned by the Participant over the Performance Period shall be determined as a function of the extent to which the applicable corresponding performance goals have been achieved. This determination shall be made solely by the Committee.

10.4 Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Shares. The Committee shall pay at the close of the applicable Performance Period, or as soon as practicable thereafter, any earned Performance Shares in the form of cash or in Shares or in a combination thereof, as specified in a Participant’s applicable Award Agreement. Any Shares paid to a Participant under this Section 10.4 may be subject to any restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee.

ARTICLE 11. PERFORMANCE UNITS

11.1 Grant of Performance Units. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, Performance Units may be granted to a Participant in such number, and upon such terms and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. Each grant of Performance Units shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement.

11.2 Value of Performance Units. Each Performance Unit shall have an initial notional value equal to a dollar amount determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. The Committee shall set performance goals in its discretion that, depending on the extent to which they are met over the specified Performance Period, will determine the number of Performance Units that shall be settled and paid to the Participant.

11.3 Earning of Performance Units. After the applicable Performance Period has ended, the number of Performance Units earned by the Participant over the Performance Period shall be determined as a function of the extent to which the applicable corresponding performance goals have been achieved. This determination shall be made solely by the Committee.

11.4 Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Units. The Committee shall pay at the close of the applicable Performance Period, or as soon as practicable thereafter, any earned Performance Units in the form of cash or in Shares or in a combination thereof, as specified in a Participant’s applicable Award Agreement. Any Shares paid to a Participant under this Section 11.4 may be subject to any restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee.

ARTICLE 12. OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS AND CASH-BASED AWARDS

12.1 Grant of Other Stock-Based Awards and Cash-Based Awards.

(a) The Committee may grant Other Stock-Based Awards not otherwise described by the terms of this Plan, including, but not limited to, the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted Shares and the grant of deferred Shares or deferred Share units, in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions, as the Committee shall determine, in its sole discretion. Such Awards may involve the transfer of actual Shares to Participants, or payment in cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of Shares.

(b) The Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Cash-Based Awards to a Participant in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine, in its sole discretion.

12.2 Value of Other Stock-Based Awards and Cash-Based Awards.

(a) Each Other Stock-Based Award shall be expressed in terms of Shares or units based on Shares, as determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion.

(b) Each Cash-Based Award shall specify a payment amount or payment range as determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. If the Committee exercises its discretion to establish performance goals, the value of Cash-Based Awards paid to the Participant will depend on the extent to which such performance goals are met.

12.3 Payment of Other Stock-Based Awards and Cash-Based Awards. Payment, if any, with respect to Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Award shall be made in accordance with the terms of the applicable Award Agreement, in cash, Shares or a combination of both as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

ARTICLE 13. TRANSFERABILITY OF AWARDS AND SHARES

13.1 Transferability of Awards. Except as provided in Section 13.2, during a Participant’s lifetime, Options and SARs shall be exercisable only by the Participant. Awards shall not be transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order entered into by a court of competent jurisdiction. No Awards shall be subject, in whole or in part, to attachment, execution or levy of any kind. Any purported transfer in violation of this Section 13.1 shall be null and void.

13.2 Committee Action. Notwithstanding Section 13.1, the Committee may, subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations and such terms and conditions as it shall specify, determine that any or all Awards shall be transferable, for no consideration to a Permitted Transferee. Any Award transferred to a Permitted Transferee shall be further transferable only by last will and testament or the laws of descent and distribution or, for no consideration, to another Permitted Transferee of the Participant. “Permitted Transferees” include (i) a Participant’s family member, (ii) one or more trusts established in whole or in part for the benefit of one or more of such family members, (iii) one or more entities which are beneficially owned in whole or in part by one or more such family members, or (iv) a charitable or not-for-profit organization. No Award may be transferred for value without shareholder approval.

13.3 Restrictions on Share Transferability. The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired by a Participant under the Plan as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, minimum holding period requirements, restrictions under applicable federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listed or traded or under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.

ARTICLE 14. PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION AND COMPLIANCE

WITH CODE SECTION 162(M)

14.1 Compliance with Section 162(m). The provisions of the Plan are intended to ensure that all Options and SARs granted hereunder to any Participant who is or may be a Covered Employee at the time of exercise of such Option or SAR qualify for exemption from the limitation on deductibility imposed by Code Section 162(m) and that such Options and SARs shall therefore be considered Performance-Based Compensation and this Plan shall be interpreted and operated consistent with that intention. The Committee may designate any Award (other than an Option or SAR) as Performance-Based Compensation upon grant, in each case based upon a determination that (i) the Participant is or may be a Covered Employee with respect to such Award, and (ii) the Committee wishes such award to qualify for exemption from the limitation on deductibility imposed by Code Section 162(m) that is set forth in Section 162(m)(4)(c). The Committee shall have the sole authority to specify which Awards are to be granted in compliance with Section 162(m) and treated as Performance-Based Compensation.

14.2 162(m) Performance-Based Compensation Grant. The Participants to receive Performance-Based Compensation will be designated, and the targets for the applicable Performance Measures will be established, by the Committee within ninety (90) days following the commencement of the applicable performance period (or such earlier or later date permitted or required by Code Section 162(m)). Each Participant will be assigned a target dollar amount or number of Shares payable if the applicable performance targets are achieved. Any payment of Performance-Based Compensation intended to comply with Code Section 162(m) shall be conditioned on the written certification of the Committee in each case that the applicable targets for the Performance Measures and any other material conditions were satisfied. The Committee may determine, at the time of Award grant, that if performance exceeds the specified targets, the Award may be settled with payment greater than the target amount, but in no event may such payment exceed the Annual Award Limits. The Committee retains the right to reduce any Award notwithstanding the attainment of the target Performance Measures.

14.3 Performance Measures. The performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of an Award to a Covered Employee that is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation shall be limited to the following Performance Measures:

(a) Book value or earnings per Share;

(b) Cash flow, free cash flow or operating cash flow;

(d) Expenses/costs;

(e) Gross, net or pre-tax income (aggregate or on a per-share basis);

(f) Net income as a percentage of sales;

(g) Gross or net operating margins or income, including operating income;

(h) Gross or net sales or revenues;

(i) Gross profit or gross margin;

(j) Improvements in capital structure, cost of capital or debt reduction;

(k) Market share or market share penetration;

(l) Growth in managed assets;

(m) Reduction of losses, loss ratios and expense ratios;

(n) Asset turns, inventory turns or fixed asset turns;

(o) Operational performance measures;

(p) Profitability ratios (pre or post tax);

(q) Profitability of an identifiable business unit or product;

(s) Share price (including growth or appreciation in share price and total shareholder return);

(t) Strategic business objectives (including objective project milestones);

(u) Transactions relating to acquisitions or divestitures; or

(v) Working capital.

Any Performance Measure(s) may, as the Committee in its sole discretion deems appropriate, (i) relate to the performance of the Company or any Subsidiary as a whole or any business unit or division of the Company or any Subsidiary or any combination thereof, (ii) be compared to the performance of a group of comparator companies, or published or special index, (iii) be based on change in the Performance Measure over a specified period of time and such change may be measured based on an arithmetic change over the specified period (e.g., cumulative change or average change), or percentage change over the specified period (e.g., cumulative percentage change, average percentage change or compounded percentage change), (iv) relate to or be compared to one or more other Performance Measures, or (v) any combination of the foregoing. Subject to Section 23.1, the Committee also has the authority to provide for accelerated vesting of any Award based on the achievement of performance goals pursuant to the Performance Measures specified in this Article 14.

14.4 Evaluation of Performance. The Performance Measures shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied on a business unit, divisional, subsidiary or consolidated basis or any combination thereof. The Committee may provide in any Award intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude the impact, if any, on reported financial results of any of the following events that occurs during a Performance Period: (a) asset write-downs, (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (c) changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions, (d) reorganization or restructuring programs, (e) acquisitions or divestitures, (f) foreign exchange gains and losses and (g) gains and losses that are treated as unusual or infrequently occurring items within the meaning of the accounting standards of the Financial Accounting Standard Board or such comparable successor term. To the extent such inclusions or exclusions affect Awards to Covered Employees, they shall be prescribed in a form that meets the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for deductibility.

14.5 Adjustment of Performance-Based Compensation. Awards that are intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation may not be adjusted upward. The Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust such Awards downward, either on a formula or discretionary basis or any combination, as the Committee determines, in its sole discretion.

14.6 Committee Discretion. In the event that applicable tax or securities laws change to permit Committee discretion to alter the governing Performance Measures or permit flexibility with respect to the terms of any Award or Awards to be treated as Performance-Based Compensation without obtaining shareholder approval of such changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion to make such changes without obtaining shareholder approval. In addition, in the event that the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant Awards that shall not qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, the Committee may make such grants without satisfying the requirements of Code Section 162(m) and base vesting on Performance Measures other than those set forth in Section 14.3.

ARTICLE 15. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT; TERMINATION OF DIRECTORSHIP AND TERMINATIONAS A THIRD-PARTY SERVICE PROVIDER

The Committee shall specify at or after the time of grant of an Award the provisions governing the disposition of an Award in the event of a Participant’s Termination of Employment or Termination of

Directorship. Subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations, in connection with a Participant’s termination, as well as Section 23.1, the Committee shall have the discretion to accelerate the vesting, exercisability or settlement of, eliminate the restrictions and conditions applicable to, or extend the post-termination exercise period of an outstanding Award. Such provisions shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and may be specified in the applicable Award Agreement or determined at a subsequent time. The Committee’s decisions need not be uniform among all Award Agreements and Participants and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination. In addition, the Committee shall determine, in its sole discretion, the circumstances constituting a termination as a Third-Party Service Provider and shall set forth those circumstances in each Award Agreement entered into with each Third‑Party Service Provider.

ARTICLE 16. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR AWARDS

16.1 Awards to Non-Employee Directors. The Board or Committee shall determine and approve all Awards to Non-Employee Directors. The terms and conditions of any grant of any Award to a Non-Employee Director shall be set forth in an Award Agreement. The aggregate maximum Fair Market Value (determined as of the Grant Date) of the Shares with respect to Awards granted under the Plan in any calendar year to any Non-Employee Director when added to retainer fees, meeting fees and any other compensation earned in respect of services as a Non-Employee Director for such a year shall not exceed $1,000,000.

16.2 Awards in Lieu of Fees. The Board or Committee may permit a Non-Employee Director the opportunity to receive an Award in lieu of payment of all or a portion of future director fees (including but not limited to cash retainer fees and meeting fees) or other type of Awards pursuant to such terms and conditions as the Board or Committee may prescribe and set forth in an applicable sub-plan or Award Agreement.

ARTICLE 17. EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN CONTROL

17.1 Change in Control. Subject to Section 23.1,if a Participant has in effect an employment, retention, Change in Control, severance or similar agreement with the Company or any Subsidiary or is subject to a policy or plan that discusses the effect of a Change in Control on a Participant’s Awards, then such agreement, plan or policy shall control. In all other cases, unless provided otherwise in an Award agreement or by the Committee prior to the date of the Change in Control, in the event of a Change in Control:

(a) If a Successor so agrees, some or all outstanding Awards shall be assumed, or replaced with the same type of award with similar terms and conditions, by a Successor in the Change in Control transaction. If applicable, each Award that is assumed by a Successor shall be appropriately adjusted, immediately after such Change in Control, to apply to the number and class of securities that would have been issuable to a Participant upon the consummation of such Change in Control had the Award been exercised, vested or earned immediately prior to such Change in Control, and other appropriate adjustments in the terms and conditions of the Award shall be made. Subject to Section 23.1, upon the termination of a Participant’s employment with a Successor in connection with or within twenty-four (24) months following the Change in Control for any reason other than an involuntary termination by a Successor for cause or a voluntary termination by the Participant without good reason (as cause and good reason (or analogous terms) are defined by an applicable employment agreement or a change in control plan or policy (including, without limitation, the AAM Executive Officer Change in Control Plan), if not applicable, the policies generally applicable to employees of a Successor), all of the Participant’s Awards that are in effect as of the date of such termination shall be vested in full or deemed earned in full (assuming the target performance goals provided under such Award were met, if applicable) effective on the date of such termination.

(b) Subject to Section 23.1, to the extent a Successor in the Change in Control transaction does not assume the Awards or issue replacement awards as provided in clause (a), then, unless provided otherwise in an Award agreement or by the Committee, immediately prior to the date of the Change in Control all Awards that are then held by Participants shall be cancelled in exchange for the right to receive the following:

(i) For each Option or SAR, a cash payment equal to the excess of the Change in Control price of the Shares covered by the Option or SAR that is so cancelled over the purchase or grant price of such Shares under the Award;

(ii) For each Share of Restricted Stock and each Restricted Stock Unit, the Change in Control price per Share in cash or such other consideration as the Company or the shareholders of the Company receive in such Change in Control;

(iii) For all Performance Shares and/or Performance Units that are earned but not yet paid, a cash payment equal to the value of the Performance Share and/or Performance Unit;

(iv) For all Performance Shares and Performance Units for which the performance period has not expired, a cash payment equal to the product of (x) and (y) where (x) is the Award the Participant would have earned based on target performance and (y) is a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of calendar months that the Participant was employed by the Company during the performance period (with any partial month counting as a full month for this purpose) and the denominator of which is the number of months in the performance period;

(v) For all other Awards that are earned but not yet paid, a cash payment equal to the value of the other Awards;

(vi) For all other Awards that are not yet earned, a cash payment equal to either the amount that would have been due under such Award(s) if any performance goals (as measured at the time of the Change in Control) were to be achieved at the target level through the end of the performance period or a cash payment based on the value of the Award as of the date of the Change in Control;

(vii) For all Dividend Equivalents, a cash payment equal to the value of the Dividend Equivalents as of the date of the Change in Control.

If the value of an Award is based on the Fair Market Value of a Share, Fair Market Value shall be deemed to mean the per share Change in Control price. The Committee shall determine the per share Change in Control price paid or deemed paid in the Change in Control transaction.

ARTICLE 18. DIVIDENDS AND DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS

The Committee may provide Participants with the right to receive dividends or payments equivalent to dividends (“Dividend Equivalents”) or interest with respect to an outstanding Award, which payments can either be paid in cash or deemed to have been reinvested in Shares, or a combination thereof, as the Committee shall determine, in each case, subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, Code Section 409A. Dividends or Dividend Equivalents with respect to Awards that vest based on the achievement of Performance Measures shall be accumulated until such Award is earned and vested, and the dividends or Dividend Equivalents shall not be paid if the Performance Measures and time-based vesting restrictions are not satisfied. Dividends or Dividend Equivalents with respect to Awards that are subject to time-based vesting restrictions shall be accumulated until such Awards vest in accordance with their terms, and the dividends or Dividend Equivalents shall not be paid if the time-based vesting restrictions are not satisfied. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no dividends or Dividend Equivalents shall be paid with respect to Options or Stock Appreciation Rights.

ARTICLE 19. BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION

Each Participant under this Plan may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under this Plan is to be paid in case of his death before he receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the Committee, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Company during the Participant’s lifetime. In the absence of any such beneficiary designation, benefits remaining unpaid or rights remaining unexercised at the Participant’s death shall be paid to or exercised by the Participant’s executor, administrator or legal representative.

ARTICLE 20. RIGHTS OF PARTICIPANTS

20.1 Employment. Nothing in this Plan or an Award Agreement shall (a) interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate any Participant’s employment with the Company or any Subsidiary at any time or for any reason not prohibited by law or (b) confer upon any Participant any right

to continue his employment or service as a Director or Third-Party Service Provider for any specified period of time. Neither an Award nor any benefits arising under this Plan shall constitute an employment contract with the Company or any Subsidiary and, accordingly, subject to Articles 3 and 21, this Plan and the benefits hereunder may be amended or terminated at any time in the sole and exclusive discretion of the Board without giving rise to any liability on the part of the Company, any Subsidiary, the Committee or the Board.

20.2 Participation. No individual shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award. The Committee may grant more than one Award to a Participant and may designate an individual as a Participant for overlapping periods of time.

20.3 Rights as a Shareholder. Except as otherwise provided herein, a Participant shall have none of the rights of a shareholder with respect to Shares covered by any Award until the Participant becomes the record holder of such Shares. No adjustment shall be made for dividends or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date on which the Participant becomes the record holder of the Shares.

ARTICLE 21. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION

21.1 Amendment and Termination of the Plan and Awards. Subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations and Section 21.3 of the Plan, the Board may at any time amend or terminate the Plan or amend or terminate any outstanding Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment of this Plan shall be made without shareholder approval if shareholder approval is required pursuant to rules promulgated by any stock exchange or quotation system on which Shares are listed or quoted or by applicable U.S. state corporate laws or regulations, applicable U.S. federal laws or regulations and the applicable laws of any foreign country or jurisdiction where Awards are, or will be, granted under the Plan.

21.2 Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events. Subject to Section 14.4, the Committee may make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 4.4) affecting the Company or the financial statements of the Company or of changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, whenever the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent unintended dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under this Plan. The determination of the Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be conclusive and binding on Participants under this Plan. By accepting an Award under this Plan, a Participant agrees to any adjustment to the Award made pursuant to this Section 21.2 without further consideration or action.

21.3 Awards Previously Granted. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, other than Sections 21.2, 21.4 and 23.15, no termination or amendment of this Plan or an Award Agreement shall adversely affect in any material way any Award previously granted under this Plan, without the written consent of the Participant holding such Award.

21.4 Amendment to Conform to Law. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, the Committee shall have the broad authority to amend the Plan, an Award or an Award Agreement, to take effect retroactively or otherwise, as deemed necessary or advisable in order to comply with, take into account changes in, or interpretations of, applicable tax laws, securities laws, employment laws, accounting rules and other applicable laws, rules, rulings and regulations promulgated thereunder. By accepting an Award under this Plan, a Participant agrees to any amendment made pursuant to this Section 21.4 to the Plan and any Award without further consideration or action.

21.5 Repricing of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. Except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, or exchange of Shares), the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended, without stockholder approval, to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, or to cancel outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights in exchange for cash, other Awards, or Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or Stock Appreciation Rights.

ARTICLE 22. TAX WITHHOLDING

22.1 Tax Withholding. The Company may require any individual entitled to receive a payment of an Award to remit to the Company prior to payment, an amount sufficient to satisfy any applicable federal, state, local and foreign tax withholding requirements. The Company shall also have the right to deduct from all cash payments made to a Participant (whether or not such payment is made in connection with an Award) any applicable taxes required to be withheld with respect to such Award.

22.2 Share Withholding. With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, upon the settlement of Restricted Stock Units, or upon the achievement of performance goals related to Performance Shares, or any other taxable event arising as a result of an Award granted hereunder (collectively and individually referred to as a “Share Payment”), the Committee may permit or require a Participant to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares from a Share Payment (or repurchase Shares that were previously issued) having a Fair Market Value on the date the withholding is to be determined equal to the minimum statutory withholding requirement or such other rate as will not result in any adverse accounting consequences, as determined by the Company in its sole discretion.

ARTICLE 23. GENERAL PROVISIONS

23.1 Minimum Vesting. All Awards shall be subject to a minimum time-based vesting restriction or Performance Period, as applicable, of not less than one year; provided, however, the requirements set forth in this sentence shall not apply (i) to acceleration in the event of a Termination of Employment or Termination of Directorship on or following a Change in Control, or due to Retirement, death or Disability, (ii) to substitute Awards subject to time-based vesting restrictions no less than the restrictions of the Awards being replaced, and (iii) Awards involving an aggregate number of Shares not in excess of 5% of the total shares authorized for issuance under this Plan.

23.2 Forfeiture Events. The Committee may specify in an Award Agreement that the Participant’s rights, payments and benefits with respect to an Award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

23.3 Legend. All certificates for Shares delivered under the Plan shall be subject to such stock-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the rules, regulations, and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any exchange upon which the Shares are then listed, and any applicable securities law, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.

23.4 Gender and Number. Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine, the plural shall include the singular, and the singular shall include the plural.

23.5 Severability. In the event any provision of this Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of this Plan, and this Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.

23.6 Requirements of Law. The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under this Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.

23.7 Delivery of Title. The Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver evidence of title for Shares issued under this Plan prior to:

(a) Obtaining any approvals from governmental agencies that the Company determines are necessary or advisable; and

(b) Completion of any registration or other qualification of the Shares under any applicable national, state or foreign law or ruling of any governmental body that the Company determines to be necessary or advisable.

23.8 Inability to Obtain Authority. The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.

23.9 Investment Representations. The Committee may require any individual receiving Shares pursuant to an Award under this Plan to represent and warrant in writing that the individual is acquiring the Shares for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares.

23.10 Employees Based Outside of the United States. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, subject to Section 23.1, in order to comply with the laws in other countries in which the Company or any Subsidiaries operate or have Employees, Directors or Third-Party Service Providers, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to:

(a) Determine which Subsidiaries shall be covered by this Plan;

(b) Determine which Employees, Directors or Third-Party Service Providers outside the United States are eligible to participate in this Plan;

(c) Modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to Employees, Directors or Third-Party Service Providers outside the United States to comply with applicable foreign laws;

(d) Establish sub-plans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures, to the extent such actions may be necessary or advisable. Any sub-plans and modifications to Plan terms and procedures established under this Section 23.10 by the Committee shall be attached to this Plan document as appendices; and

(e) Take any action, before or after an Award is made, that it deems advisable to obtain approval or comply with any necessary local government regulatory exemptions or approvals.

Notwithstanding the above, the Committee may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate applicable law.

23.11 Uncertificated Shares. To the extent that this Plan provides for issuance of certificates to reflect the transfer of Shares, the transfer of such Shares may be affected on a noncertificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange.

23.12 Unfunded Plan. Participants shall have no right, title or interest whatsoever in or to any investments that the Company or any Subsidiaries may make to aid it in meeting its obligations under this Plan. Nothing contained in this Plan, and no action taken pursuant to its provisions, shall create or be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Participant, beneficiary, legal representative or any other individual. To the extent that any individual acquires a right to receive payments from the Company or any Subsidiary under this Plan, such right shall be no greater than the right of an unsecured general creditor of the Company or the Subsidiary, as the case may be. All payments to be made hereunder shall be paid from the general funds of the Company, or the Subsidiary, as the case may be, and no special or separate fund shall be established, and no segregation of assets shall be made to assure payment of such amounts except as expressly set forth in this Plan.

23.13 No Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to this Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, Awards or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.

23.14 Retirement and Welfare Plans. Neither Awards made under this Plan nor Shares or cash paid pursuant to such Awards may be included as “compensation” for purposes of computing the benefits payable to any Participant under the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s retirement plans (both qualified and nonqualified) or welfare benefit plans unless such other plan expressly provides that such compensation shall be taken into account in computing a Participant’s benefit.

23.15 Deferrals.

(a) Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Plan or an Award Agreement, if any provision of the Plan or an Award Agreement contravenes any regulations or guidance promulgated under Code Section 409A or would cause an Award to be subject to additional taxes, accelerated taxation, interest and/or penalties under Code Section 409A, such provision of the Plan or Award Agreement may be modified by the Committee without consent of the Participant in any manner the Committee deems reasonable or necessary. In making such modifications the Committee shall attempt, but shall not be obligated, to maintain, to the maximum extent practicable, the original intent of the applicable provision without contravening the provisions of Code Section 409A. Moreover, any discretionary authority that the Committee may have pursuant to the Plan shall not be applicable to an Award that is subject to Code Section 409A to the extent such discretionary authority would contravene Code Section 409A or the guidance promulgated thereunder.

(b) If a Participant is a “specified employee” as defined under Code Section 409A and the Participant’s Award is to be settled on account of the Participant’s separation from service (for reasons other than death) and such Award constitutes “deferred compensation” as defined under Code Section 409A, then any portion of the Participant’s Award that would otherwise be settled during the six-month period commencing on the Participant’s separation from service shall be settled as soon as practicable following the conclusion of the six-month period (or following the Participant’s death if it occurs during such six-month period).

(c) In accordance with the procedures authorized by, and subject to the approval of, the Committee, Participants may be given the opportunity to defer the payment or settlement of an Award to one or more dates selected by the Participant; provided, however, that the terms of any deferrals must comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, Code Section 409A. No deferral opportunity shall exist with respect to an Award unless explicitly permitted by the Committee on or after the time of grant.

23.16 Nonexclusivity of this Plan. The adoption of this Plan shall not be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board or Committee to adopt such other compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable for any Participant.

23.17 No Constraint on Corporate Action. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to: (i) limit, impair, or otherwise affect the Company’s or a Subsidiary’s right or power to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations or changes of its capital or business structure, or to merge or consolidate, or dissolve, liquidate, sell or transfer all or any part of its business or assets; or, (ii) limit the right or power of the Company or a Subsidiary to take any action that such entity deems to be necessary or appropriate. The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of Shares pursuant to Awards will be used for general corporate purposes.

23.18 Conflicts. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the Plan and any Award Agreement, the Plan shall govern and the Award Agreement shall be interpreted to minimize or eliminate any such inconsistency.

23.19 Recoupment. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, all Awards granted under the Plan and any payments made under the Plan shall be subject to claw-back or recoupment as permitted or mandated by applicable law, rules, regulations or Company policy as enacted, adopted or modified from time to time. For the avoidance of doubt, this provision shall apply to any gains realized upon exercise or settlement of an Award.

23.20 Delivery and Execution of Electronic Documents. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Company may (i) deliver by email or other electronic means (including posting on a website maintained by the Company or by a third party under contract with the Company) all documents relating to the Plan or any Award thereunder (including without limitation, prospectuses and other securities requirements) and all other documents that the Company is required to deliver to its security holders (including without limitation, annual

reports and proxy statements) and (ii) permit Participants to electronically execute applicable Plan documents (including, but not limited to, Award Agreements) in a manner prescribed to the Committee.

23.21 No Representations or Warranties Regarding Tax Effect. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Company, Subsidiaries, the Board and the Committee neither represent nor warrant the tax treatment under any federal, state, local or foreign laws and regulations thereunder (individually and collectively referred to as the “Tax Laws”) of any Award granted or any amounts paid to any Participant under the Plan including, but not limited to, when and to what extent such Awards or amounts may be subject to tax, penalties and interest under the Tax Laws.

23.22 Indemnification. Subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations and the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation as it may be amended from time to time, each individual who is or shall have been a member of the Board, or a Committee appointed by the Board, or an officer of the Company to whom authority was delegated in accordance with Article 3, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from (i) any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any good faith action taken or failure to act under this Plan, (ii) any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement thereof, with the Company’s approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit, or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his/her own behalf. Notwithstanding the forgoing, no individual shall be entitled to indemnification if such loss, cost, liability or expense is a result of his/her own willful misconduct. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such individuals may be entitled under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or By-laws, as a matter of law or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

23.23 Successors. Subject to Article 17, all obligations of the Company under this Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company (each, a “Successor”), whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

23.24 Governing Law. The Plan and each Award Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of Delaware excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of this Plan to the substantive law of another jurisdiction.




	Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May ~~1, 2014.~~4, 2017.
		Vote by Internet • Go to www.envisionreports.com/axl • Or scan the QR code with your smartphone • Follow the steps outlined on the secure website
	Vote by telephone • Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone • Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.	x

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

Proposals —

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposal 2, and FOR Proposal 3.

Proposals —

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposal 2, FOR Proposal 3, FOR an annual frequency on Proposal 4 and FOR Proposal 5.

Election of Directors:

For

Withhold

For

Withhold

For

Withhold

Election of Directors:

For

Against

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

01 - James A. McCaslin

02 - William P. Miller II

03 - Samuel Valenti III

01 - James A. McCaslin

02 - William P. Miller II

03 - Samuel Valenti III

For

Against

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014.

Approval of the Amended and Restated American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company's named executive officers.

In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to the extent permitted by law to vote on any and all other matters as may properly come before the meeting, including the authority to vote to adjourn the meeting.

1 Year

2 Years

3 Years

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017.



B	Non-Voting Items
Change of Address — Please print new address below.		Meeting Attendance
		Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.	¬Œ



C	Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below
	Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed.
	Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.		Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.	Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
		/ /

~~01RYHA~~02AGBA

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

Proxy — American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.

PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS ON May ~~1, 2014~~4, 2017

SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

David C. Dauch and David E. Barnes, or either of them, with full power of substitution, are authorized to vote all of your shares as if you were present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. to be held in the Auditorium at AAM’s World Headquarters Complex, One Dauch Drive, Detroit, Michigan, at 3:8:00 ~~p.m.~~a.m. on May ~~1, 2014~~4, 2017 or at any adjournments of the meeting.

This proxy will be voted as you specify on the reverse side. If you do not make a choice, this proxy will be voted for the director nominees in Proposal 1, for the approval of the Amended and Restated American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan in Proposal 2, for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of ~~the Company’s~~our named executive officers in Proposal 23, "1 year" for the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation in Proposal 4 and for ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm in Proposal 3.5.

Voting over the Internet or by telephone reduces costs to AAM. If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, please do not mail this card.

(Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)



¬ o	Preliminary Proxy Statement
¬ o	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ý	Definitive Proxy Statement
¬ o	Definitive Additional Materials
¬ o	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
ý	No fee required.
¬ o	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
	1	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	2	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	3	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	4	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	5	Total fee paid:
¬ o	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¬ o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	1	Amount Previously Paid:
	2	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	3	Filing Party:
	4	Date Filed:



Time and Place		3:8:00 ~~p.m.~~a.m., local time, on Thursday, May ~~1, 2014~~4, 2017

		AAM World Headquarters Auditorium, One Dauch Drive, Detroit, Michigan

Items of Business		(1) ~~Elect~~Election of three members of the Board of Directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in ~~2017;~~2020;
		(2) Approval of Amended and Restated AAM 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan;
		(3) Advisory vote ~~to approve~~on named executive officer compensation; ~~(3) Ratify~~
		(4) Advisory vote on frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation;
		(5) Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as ~~AAM’s~~ independent ~~registered~~ public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, ~~2014;~~2017; and ~~(4) Attend to other~~
		(6) Other business properly presented at the meeting.

Record Date		You may vote if you were an AAM stockholder at the close of business on March ~~4, 2014.~~7, 2017.

Meeting Admission		Admission may be limited to AAM stockholders as of the record date and holders of valid proxies. Please be prepared to present identification for admittance. Stockholders holding stock in brokerage accounts will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of the record date. Cameras and recording devices will not be permitted.

Proxy Materials		We have elected to furnish materials for the ~~2014~~2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders via the Internet. On March ~~21, 2014,~~23, 2017, we mailed a notice of Internet availability ~~(notice)~~ to most stockholders containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials on the Internet instead of receiving paper copies in the mail.

		Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the May ~~1, 2014~~4, 2017 Stockholder ~~Meeting.~~Meeting: The Proxy Statement and ~~2013~~2016 Annual Report and Form 10-K are available at www.envisionreports.com/~~AXL.~~axl.



	Page No.
INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS	2

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING AND THE ANNUAL MEETING	2

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS	4
Nominees for Director	5
Returning Directors	76
Corporate Governance	1110

PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC. 2012 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN	16

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS	1725
Compensation Discussion and Analysis	1725
Summary Compensation Table	2939
Grants of Plan-Based Awards	3141
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, ~~2013~~2016	3444
Options Exercised and Stock Vested	3545
Pension Benefits	3646
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation	3848
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control	4050

PROPOSAL 2:3: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	4556

PROPOSAL 4: FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	~~2013~~57

2016 COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS	4658

SECURITY OWNERSHIP	4860
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance	5061

PROPOSAL 3:5: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR ~~2014~~ 2017	5162

AUDIT COMMITTEE DISCLOSURE	5162
Report of the Audit Committee	5162
Policy for Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services	5263
Fees of Independent Public Accountants	5263

OTHER MATTERS	5364

APPENDIX A: AMENDED AND RESTATED AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC. 2012 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN	A-1



~~Term~~	~~Initial Term: September 1, 2012 through August 31, 2015~~ ~~Additional one-year extensions unless either party provides 60 days’ written notice of intent not to renew. Automatic two-year extension upon a change in control.~~ CEO Employment Agreement	President Employment Agreement
Base Salary	$1,150,000 effective January 1, ~~million effective September 1, 2012,~~2015, subject to annual review and increase by the Compensation ~~Committee in its sole discretion. Base salary increased~~Committee.	$640,000 effective August 1, 2015, subject to ~~$1.1 million effective September 1, 2013.~~annual review and increase by the Compensation Committee.
Annual Incentive	Participation in the ~~AAM Annual Incentive Plan~~annual incentive plan for ~~Executive Officers~~ executive officers. Target opportunity isof 125% of base salary, subject to the annual review and increase by the Compensation Committee.	Participation in the annual incentive plan for executive officers. Target opportunity of 100% of base salary, subject to annual review and increase by the Compensation Committee.
Long-Term Incentive	Participation in the long-term incentive plans ~~applicable to~~for executive ~~officers~~ officers. Target opportunity ~~is 350%~~ of ~~base salary~~ 400% for 2016, subject to annual review and increase by the Compensation Committee.	Participation in the long-term incentive plans for executive officers. Target opportunity of 230% for 2016, subject to annual review and increase by the Compensation Committee.
Other Benefits	Participation in plans applicable to executive ~~officers~~ officers. Retiree medical, dental and vision coverage equivalent to the benefit levels offered in the ~~Company’s~~Company's group health care plans for ~~active~~ salaried associates as of September 1, ~~2012~~ 2012.	Participation in plans applicable to executive officers.
Term	Initial term expired August 31, 2015. Additional one-year extensions unless either party provides 60 days' written notice of intent not to renew.	Initial term is August 1, 2015 through July 31, 2018. Additional one-year extensions unless either party provides 60 days' written notice of intent not to renew.



~~Term~~	~~In effect through August 2, 2013~~
~~Base Salary~~	~~$2 million per year~~
~~2013 Annual Incentive~~	~~Participation in the AAM Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers~~ ~~Target opportunity is 200% of base salary. 2013 award pro-rated based on time served through August 2, 2013.~~
~~Long-Term Incentive~~	~~No grants subsequent to 2012.~~
~~Other Benefits~~	~~Participation in plans applicable to executive officers~~ ~~Reimbursement of premiums under a $5 million life insurance policy purchased by Mr. R.E. Dauch~~ ~~Use and maintenance of two Company-provided automobiles~~



SEC 1913 (02-02)		Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.



Company	2014 Peer Group	2013 Peer Group	Competitor Peer Group
A. O. Smith Corporation	X	X
BorgWarner Inc.	X	X	X
Briggs & Stratton	X
Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc.	X
Dana Holding Corporation	X	X	X
Donaldson Company, Inc.	X	X
Federal-Mogul Corporation	X	X
Flowserve Corporation	X	X
Kennametal Inc.	X	X
Lear Corporation	X	X	X
Meritor Inc.	X	X	X
Regal-Beloit Corporation	X
Tenneco Automotive Inc.	X		X
Terex Corporation	X	X
Tower International Inc.	X
Trinity Industries, Inc.	X	X
USG Corporation	X	X
Valmont Industries, Inc.	X	X
Visteon Corporation	X	X	X
Woodward Inc.	X
Ball Corporation		X
Brady Corporation		X
Cameron International Corporation		X
Cummins Inc.		X
Dover Corporation		X
Eaton Corporation		X
Federal Signal Corporation		X
Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.		X
FMC Technologies		X
Genuine Parts Company		X
Harley-Davidson Motor Company		X
Ingersoll-Rand Company		X
Joy Global Inc.		X
Navistar International		X
Owens-Illinois, Inc.		X
PACCAR Inc.		X
Polaris Industries Inc.		X
Rockwell Automation		X
Sauer-Danfoss Inc.		X
Sonoco Products Company		X
Thomas & Betts Corporation		X
The Timken Company		X
TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.		X
Woodward Governor Company		X
Autoliv Inc.			X
Magna International Inc.			X
Total Number of Companies	20	38	8



	Net Operating Cash Flow		Net Income as a Percentage of Sales
	Performance	Payout	Performance	Payout
Threshold	$25 million	50%	1%	30%
Target	$75 million	100%	3%	100%
Maximum	$100 million	125%	>3%	>100%



	Target Long-Term Incentive Opportunity
	2013	2012
David C. Dauch	350%	240%
Michael K. Simonte	200%	120%
John J. Bellanti	200%	120%
Alberto L. Satine	120%	80%
Norman Willemse	100%	80%



	AAM Incentive Compensation Plan		AAM LTIP		Total
David C. Dauch	$	1,196,250	$	1,989,000	$	3,185,250
Michael K. Simonte	$	378,485	$	1,050,600	$	1,429,085
John J. Bellanti^(a)	$	285,000	$	1,393,896	$	1,678,896
Alberto L. Satine	$	185,000	$	380,800	$	565,800
Norman Willemse	$	167,040	$	412,080	$	579,120
Richard E. Dauch	$	2,030,000	$	—	$	2,030,000


(d)	Includes personal use of Company-provided vehicles. The aggregate incremental cost of Company-provided vehicles is based on total vehicle cost if business use of the vehicle is less than ~~30%~~50%. For Mr. ~~D.C. Dauch and Mr. R.E.~~ Dauch, includes the cost of ~~the~~ personal use of a second Company-provided ~~vehicle for each of them.~~vehicle.


(e)	Includes amounts reimbursed for taxes attributable to the income associated with the cost of ~~spousal~~ travel for ~~participation in~~spouse accompanying the NEO to Company business meetings and events.


Name	Grant Date	Approval Date	Estimated Future Payouts under Non Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾			All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units⁽²⁾ (#)	All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards⁽³⁾ ($)	Grant Date	Approval Date	Estimated Future Payouts under Non Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾			Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽²⁾			All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units⁽³⁾ (#)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards⁽⁴⁾ ($)
Name	Grant Date	Approval Date	Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)			Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards⁽³⁾ ($)	Grant Date	Approval Date	Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)	Threshold (#)	Target (#)	Maximum (#)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards⁽⁴⁾ ($)
David C. Dauch
Annual Incentive	1/1/2013	10/24/2012	550,000	1,375,000	—	—	—	—	—	1/1/2016	12/8/2015	718,750	1,437,500	2,875,000	—	—	—	—	—
Long-Term Incentive	3/6/2013	2/6/2013	—	—	—	137,687	—	—	1,750,002
Long-Term Incentive	3/6/2013	2/6/2013	437,500	1,750,000	3,500,000	—	—	—	—
Performance Shares (TSR)										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	49,190	98,380	196,760	—	1,294,857
Performance Shares (EBITDA)										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	24,595	98,380	196,760	—	2,758,212
Restricted Stock Units										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	—	—	—	101,361	1,564,000
Christopher J. May
Annual Incentive										1/1/2016	12/8/2015	120,000	240,000	480,000	—	—	—	—	—
Performance Shares (TSR)										3/4/2016	2/3/2016				4,278	8,555	17,110		112,599
Performance Shares (EBITDA)										3/4/2016	2/3/2016				2,139	8,555	17,110		239,851
Restricted Stock Units										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	—	—	—	8,814	136,000
Michael K. Simonte
Annual Incentive	1/1/2013	10/24/2012	174,016	435,040	—	—	—	—	—	1/1/2016	12/8/2015	320,000	640,000	1,280,000	—	—	—	—	—
Long-Term Incentive	3/6/2013	2/6/2013	—	—	—	42,786	—	—	543,810
Long-Term Incentive	3/6/2013	2/6/2013	135,950	543,800	1,087,600	—	—	—	—
John J. Bellanti
Annual Incentive	1/1/2013	10/24/2012	155,424	388,560	—	—	—	—	—
Long-Term Incentive	3/6/2013	2/6/2013	—	—	—	38,215	—	—	485,713
Long-Term Incentive	3/6/2013	2/6/2013	121,425	485,700	971,400	—	—	—	—
Performance Shares (TSR)										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	15,741	31,482	62,964	—	414,359
Performance Shares (EBITDA)										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	7,871	31,482	62,964	—	882,639
Restricted Stock Units										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	—	—	—	32,436	500,488
Alberto L. Satine
Annual Incentive	1/1/2013	10/24/2012	86,400	216,000	—	—	—	—	—	1/1/2016	12/8/2015	204,000	408,000	816,000	—	—	—	—	—
Long-Term Incentive	3/6/2013	2/6/2013	—	—	—	16,995	—	—	216,006
Long-Term Incentive	3/6/2013	2/6/2013	54,000	216,000	432,000	—	—	—	—
Performance Shares (TSR)										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	8,181	16,361	32,722	—	215,340
Performance Shares (EBITDA)										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	4,090	16,361	32,722	—	458,702
Restricted Stock Units										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	—	—	—	16,857	260,104
Norman Willemse
Annual Incentive	1/1/2013	10/24/2012	76,800	192,000	—	—	—	—	—	1/1/2016	12/8/2015	180,000	360,000	720,000	—	—	—	—	—
Long-Term Incentive	3/6/2013	2/6/2013	—	—	—	12,589	—	—	160,006
Long-Term Incentive	3/6/2013	2/6/2013	40,000	160,000	320,000	—	—	—	—
Richard E. Dauch
Annual Incentive	1/1/2013	10/24/2012	1,600,000	4,000,000	—	—	—	—	—
Performance Shares (TSR)										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	7,219	14,437	28,874	—	190,017
Performance Shares (EBITDA)										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	3,609	14,437	28,874	—	404,760
Restricted Stock Units										3/4/2016	2/3/2016	—	—	—	—	—	—	14,874	229,506


(1)	Reflects annual incentive awards granted under the AAM Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers. ~~Also reflects the long-term incentive~~


~~(2)~~(3)	Reflects ~~RSU awards~~RSUs granted under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The awards are payable in common stock, contingent upon continued employment through the ~~three-year~~3-year vesting period. ~~See further discussion in the~~ ~~Narrative to the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table~~. No options were granted in ~~2013.~~ 2016.


	EBITDA Performance Measure		TSR Performance Measure		EBITDA Margin Performance Measure		Relative TSR Performance Measure
Performance Level	3-Year Cumulative EBITDA Margin	Percent of Target Award Opportunity Earned	Company’s TSR Percentile Rank	Percent of Target Award Opportunity Earned	3-Year Cumulative EBITDA Margin	Percent of Target Award Opportunity Earned	Company TSR Percentile Rank	Percent of Target Award Opportunity Earned
Threshold	8%	25%	35^th	50%	10%	25%	35^th	50%
Target	12%	100%	50^th	100%	12%	100%	50^th	100%
Maximum	15%	200%	75^th	200%	15%	200%	75^th	200%


						Option Awards			Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable⁽¹⁾ (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested⁽²⁾ ($)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable⁽¹⁾ (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested⁽²⁾ ($)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market of Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)⁽⁸⁾
David C. Dauch	28,000	38.70	2/2/2014	79,326⁽³⁾	1,622,217	13,000	26.02	3/14/2017	66,447⁽³⁾	1,282,427
	12,000	26.65	3/15/2015	22,382⁽⁴⁾	457,712				58,070⁽⁴⁾	1,120,751
	15,000	15.58	3/15/2016	137,687⁽⁵⁾	2,815,699				101,361⁽⁵⁾	1,956,267
	13,000	26.02	3/14/2017								28,181⁽⁶⁾	543,893
											112,724⁽⁶⁾	2,175,573
											49,190⁽⁷⁾	949,367
											196,760⁽⁷⁾	3,797,468
Christopher J. May						—	—	—	7,310⁽³⁾	141,083
									5,875⁽⁴⁾	113,388
									8,814⁽⁵⁾	170,110
											4,278⁽⁷⁾	82,565
											17,110⁽⁷⁾	330,223
Michael K. Simonte	8,500	38.70	2/2/2014	34,466⁽³⁾	704,830	10,000	26.02	3/14/2017	19,334⁽³⁾	373,146
	9,000	26.65	3/15/2015	42,786⁽⁵⁾	874,974				15,537⁽⁴⁾	299,864
	10,000	15.58	3/15/2016						32,436⁽⁵⁾	626,015
	10,000	26.02	3/14/2017
John J. Bellanti	16,000	38.70	2/2/2014	21,247⁽³⁾	434,501
	9,000	26.65	3/15/2015	38,215⁽⁵⁾	781,497						7,540⁽⁶⁾	145,522
	6,700	15.58	3/15/2016								30,160⁽⁶⁾	582,088
	10,000	26.02	3/14/2017								15,741⁽⁷⁾	303,801
	11,000	10.08	6/25/2018								62,964⁽⁷⁾	1,215,205
Alberto L. Satine	9,000	38.70	2/2/2014	13,929⁽³⁾	284,848	8,000	26.02	3/14/2017	9,320⁽³⁾	179,876
	8,000	26.65	3/15/2015	16,995⁽⁵⁾	347,548				7,490⁽⁴⁾	144,557
	8,000	26.02	3/14/2017						16,857⁽⁵⁾	325,340
Norman Willemse	7,500	38.70	2/2/2014	13,520⁽³⁾	276,484
	9,700	10.08	6/25/2018	12,589⁽⁵⁾	257,445
Richard E. Dauch⁽⁶⁾	300,000	38.70	2/2/2014
	150,000	26.65	3/15/2015								3,635⁽⁶⁾	70,156
	150,000	15.58	3/15/2016								14,540⁽⁶⁾	280,622
	150,000	26.02	3/14/2017								8,181⁽⁷⁾	157,893
	100,500	9.19	8/2/2017								32,722⁽⁷⁾	631,535
Norman Willemse						9,700	10.08	6/25/2018	6,645⁽³⁾	128,249
									5,521⁽⁴⁾	106,555
									14,874⁽⁵⁾	287,068
											2,680⁽⁶⁾	51,724
											10,718⁽⁶⁾	206,857
											7,219⁽⁷⁾	139,327
											28,874⁽⁷⁾	557,268


(1)	All outstanding options are vested as of December 31, ~~2013.~~2016.


(2)	Reflects value of outstanding RSUs ~~using a share price of $20.45,~~at $19.30, the closing price of AAM common stock on December ~~31, 2013.~~30, 2016.


(3)	Reflects RSUs granted on May 30, 2012 under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. RSUs for Mr. D.C. Dauch, Mr. Simonte, Mr. Satine and Mr. Willemse vest three years from the date of grant. RSUs for Mr. Bellanti were forfeited upon retirementMarch 6, 2014 that vested on ~~January 1, 2014.~~March 6, 2017.


(4)	Reflects RSUs granted on ~~September 1, 2012 under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan pursuant to Mr. D.C. Dauch’s employment agreement. The~~March 2, 2015. RSUs ~~for Mr. D.C. Dauch~~ vest three years from the date of grant.


(5)	Reflects RSUs granted on March ~~6, 2013 under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan.~~4, 2016. RSUs ~~for Mr. D.C. Dauch, Mr. Simonte, Mr. Satine and Mr. Willemse~~ vest three years from the date of grant. ~~RSUs for Mr. Bellanti were forfeited upon his retirement on January 1, 2014.~~


(8)	Reflects the value of 2015 and 2016 performance shares based on performance through December 31, 2016 as described above in footnotes (6) and (7) multiplied by $19,30, the closing price of AAM common stock on December 30, 2016.


(1)	Reflects the number of shares acquired upon exercise of stock options. Value realized upon exercise is based on the difference between the market price of AAM common stock acquired upon exercise and the exercise price for suchNo stock options onwere exercised by the ~~exercise date.~~NEOs in 2016.


(3)	Reflects the number of shares underlying vested RSUs multiplied by the closing market price of AAM common stock on the vesting date. ~~For Mr. R.E. Dauch,~~Also, includes the ~~value realized on vesting upon death was $12,228,260.~~number of performance shares earned for the period ending December 31, 2016 multiplied by the closing market price of AAM common stock at December 30, 2016.


Name	Plan Name	Number of Years of Credited Service (#)	Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)	Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)	Plan Name	Number of Years of Credited Service⁽¹⁾ (#)	Present Value of Accumulated Benefit⁽²⁾ ($)
David C. Dauch	AAM Retirement Program for Salaried Employees	11.5000⁽¹⁾	250,031	—	AAM Retirement Program for Salaried Employees	11.5000	364,791
David C. Dauch	AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	18.5000	1,617,968	—	AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	21.5000	5,172,154
Christopher J. May					AAM Retirement Program for Salaried Employees	12.5000	158,884
Christopher J. May					AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	22.5000	620,619
Michael K. Simonte	AAM Retirement Program for Salaried Employees	8.0833⁽¹⁾	167,221	—	AAM Retirement Program for Salaried Employees	8.0833	243,377
Michael K. Simonte	AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	15.0833	823,708	—	AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	18.0833	1,868,966
John J. Bellanti⁽²⁾	AAM Retirement Program for Salaried Employees	17.8333⁽¹⁾	804,187	—
John J. Bellanti⁽²⁾	AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	19.8333	835,056	—
Alberto Satine⁽³⁾	AAM Retirement Program for Salaried Employees	10.5833⁽¹⁾	399,540	—
Alberto Satine⁽³⁾	AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	12.5833	281,112	—
Alberto L. Satine⁽³⁾					AAM Retirement Program for Salaried Employees	10.5833	652,737
Alberto L. Satine⁽³⁾					AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	15.5833	770,951
Norman Willemse⁽⁴⁾	Albion Pension Plan	6.3333	276,017	—	Albion Pension Plan	6.3333	313,773
Norman Willemse⁽⁴⁾	AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	11.9167	279,998	—	AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	15.5000	815,834
Richard E. Dauch⁽⁵⁾	AAM Retirement Program for Salaried Employees	17.8333⁽¹⁾	544,571	16,163
Richard E. Dauch⁽⁵⁾	AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Program	23.5833	17,434,222	503,028


(3)	Mr. Satine was eligible to retire on December 31, ~~2013~~2016 under both the SRP and the SERP. He qualifies for a reduced benefit of approximately ~~54%~~88% of the unreduced benefit under the SRP and ~~for~~ the ~~basic form of~~lump sum benefit under the SERP.


(4)	Mr. Willemse is not a participant in the SRP. Mr. Willemse was eligible to retire on December 31, ~~2013~~2016 under both the Albion Pension Plan and the SERP. He qualifies for the ~~current~~lump sum benefit ~~formula~~ under the SERP.


~~(5)~~	Mr. R.E. Dauch's present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2013 was reduced to the survivorship portion of the benefits payable under the SERP and the SRP. His surviving spouse began receiving benefit payments in September 2013.


Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY⁽¹⁾ ($)	Registrant contributions in Last FY⁽²⁾ ($)	Aggregate Earnings In Last FY⁽³⁾ ($)	Aggregate Withdrawals Distributions⁽⁴⁾ ($)		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE⁽⁵⁾ ($)	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)	Registrant contributions in Last FY ($)	Aggregate Earnings In Last FY⁽¹⁾ ($)	Aggregate Withdrawals Distributions ($)	Aggregate Balance at Last FYE⁽²⁾ ($)
David C. Dauch	—	—	50,956	—		352,194	—	—	15,219	—	400,741
Christopher J. May							—	—	—	—	—
Michael K. Simonte	—	—	—	—		—	—	—	—	—	—
John J. Bellanti	—	—	93,646	—		661,521
Alberto L. Satine	—	—	—	—		—	—	—	—	—	—
Norman Willemse	35,100	768	11,069	—		75,904	—	—	14,847	—	141,550
Richard E. Dauch	—	—	55,056	(5,557,373	)	—


(1)	For Mr. Willemse, reflects $25,600 of his 2013 base salary and $9,500 of his 2012 annual incentive award paid March 2013. Base salary amounts deferred are included in the salary column for 2013 in the ~~Summary Compensation Table~~ ~~and the 2012 annual incentive award deferred is included in the non-equity incentive compensation column for 2012 in the~~ ~~Summary Compensation Table~~.


~~(2)~~	~~Reflects the Company's 3% match on Mr. Willemse's 2013 base salary deferral. This amount is included in the all other compensation column for 2013 in the~~ ~~Summary Compensation Table~~.


~~(3)~~	Reflects hypothetical accrued earnings or losses during ~~2013~~2016 on notional investments designed to track the performance of funds similar to those available to participants in the Company’s 401(k) plan. None of the earnings shown in this column are reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.


~~(4)~~	~~Upon his death, Mr. R.E. Dauch's beneficiary received a distribution of the plan account balance.~~


~~(5)~~(2)	Of the aggregate balance, the amounts reflect compensation previously reported in the ~~Summary Compensation Table for each of the NEOs. For Mr. Willemse, the amount includes $26,368 reported as compensation in the~~ Summary Compensation Table for ~~2013.~~each of the NEOs.